Skip to main content
Log in

Reducibility and contractivity of Runge–Kutta methods revisited

  • Published:
BIT Numerical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The exact relation between a Cooper-like reducibility concept and the reducibilities introduced by Hundsdorfer, Spijker and by Dahlquist and Jeltsch is given. A shifted Runge–Kutta scheme and a transplanted differential equation is introduced in such a fashion that the input/output relation remains unchanged under these transformations. This gives a technique to prove stability and contractivity results. This is demonstrated on the example of contractivity disks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Burrage and J. C. Butcher, Stability criteria for implicit Runge–Kutta methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 16 (1979), pp. 46–57.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Burrage and J. C. Butcher, Nonlinear stability of a general class of differential equation methods, BIT, 20 (1980), pp. 185–203.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. G. J. Cooper, A generalization of algebraic stability for Runge–Kutta methods, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 4 (1984), pp. 427–440.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. G. J. Cooper, Reducible Runge–Kutta methods, BIT, 25 (1985), pp. 675–680.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Crouzeix, Sur la B-stabilitée des méthodes de Runge-Kutta, Numer. Math., 32 (1979), pp. 75–82.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Dahlquist and R. Jeltsch, Generalized disks of contractivity for explicit and implicit Runge–Kutta methods, Dept. of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Report TRITA-NA-7906, 1979.

  7. G. Dahlquist and R. Jeltsch, Shifted Runge–Kutta methods and transplanted differential equations, in Numerical Treatment of Differential Equations, K. Strehmel, ed., Proceedings of the fourth Seminar held in Halle, 1987, Teubner, Leipzig, 1988.

  8. K. Dekker and J. G. Verwer, Stability of Runge–Kutta Methods for Stiff Nonlinear Differential Equations, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.

  9. W. Gröbner, Matrizenrechnung, B.I. Hochschultaschenbücher, 103/103a, Bibliograpisches Institut, Mannheim, 1966.

  10. M. Huang, On the contractivity region of Runge–Kutta methods, Dept. of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Report TRITA-NA-8106, 1981.

  11. W. H. Hundsdorfer and M. N. Spijker, A note on B-stability of Runge–Kutta methods, Numer. Math., 36 (1981), pp. 319–333.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Lancaster, Theory of Matrices, Academic Press, New York, London, 1969.

  13. J. Oliver, A curiosity of low-order explicit Runge–Kutta methods, Math. Comput., 29 (1975), pp. 1032–1036.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. N. Spijker, Monotonicity and boundedness in implicit Runge–Kutta methods, Numer. Math., 50 (1986), pp. 97–109.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. H. J. Stetter, Analysis of Discretization Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1973.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Jeltsch.

Additional information

AMS subject classification (2000)

65L07

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeltsch, R. Reducibility and contractivity of Runge–Kutta methods revisited . Bit Numer Math 46, 567–587 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-006-0079-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-006-0079-7

Key words

Navigation