Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Science and values in the biodiversity-ecosystem function debate

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores interactions between ecological science and conservation values in the biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF) debate of the 1990–2000s. The scientific debate concerned the interpretation of observed correlations between species richness and ecosystem properties like primary productivity in experimental ecosystems. The debate over the causal or explanatory role of species richness was presumed to have implications for conservation policy, and the use of such research to support policy recommendations generated hostility between rival groups of ecologists. I argue that the debate was due in part to the adoption of a broad conception of biodiversity as a goal and value in conservation politics and ethical debates, and the ecologists who questioned the causal efficacy of species richness were also suggesting problems with this goal. I characterize what I call the “uneasy consensus” established by BEF researchers in the late 2000s, discuss roles for values in BEF research, and suggest that this episode shows that ecological science can itself be an important site for ethical debates about conservation values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Functions” are thus understood by these researchers not in terms of selected effects or an account of adaptive function, but rather in terms of systemic causal role (Cummins 1975).

  2. See Lean (2021) for discussion.

  3. See the chapters in Elliott and Richards (2017) for discussion of inductive risk.

References

  • Burch-Brown J, Archer A (2017) In defence of biodiversity. Biology & Philosophy 32:969–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen H (2020) Conceptual engineering: the master argument. In: Burgess C (ed) Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford, New York, pp 132–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Srivastava DS, Duffy JE et al (2006) Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443:989–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU et al (2011) The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am J Bot 98(3):572–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU et al (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/convention/text/

  • Cummins RC (1975) Functional analysis. J Philos 72:741–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deLaplante K, Picasso V (2011) The biodiversity-ecosystem function debate in ecology. In: deLaplante, K, Brown, B, Peacock, KA (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 11: Philosophy of Ecology. Elsevier, New York, 169–200

  • Douglas H (2000) Inductive risk and values in science. Philos Sci 67(4):559–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas H (2016) Values in science. In: Humphreys P (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott K, Richards T (eds) (2017) Exploring Inductive Risk. Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faith D (2008) Biodiversity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/biodiversity/

  • Frank DM (2017) Biodiversity and biological diversities: Consequences of pluralism between biology and policy. In Garson eds. (2017), 96–109

  • Garson J, Plutynski A, Sarkar S (eds) (2017) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Biodiversity. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1997) Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 277(5330):1260–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hector A, Schmid B, Beirkuhnlein C et al (1999) Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1997) The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem properties. Science 277(5330):1302–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Solan M, Symstad A et al (2002) Species diversity, functional diversity, and ecosystem functioning. In: Loreau, M, Naeem, S, Inchausti, P eds. (2002), 195–208

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS III et al (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75(1):3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell S (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston M (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H (1994) Factors of Soil Formation. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser J (2000) Rift over species diversity divides ecologists. Science 289:1282–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean C (2017) Biodiversity Realism: Preserving the tree of life. Biology & Philosophy 32:1083–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean C (2021) Invasive species increase biodiversity and, therefore, services: An argument of equivocations. Conserv Sci Pract. 553 https://doi.org/10.111/csp2.553

  • Longino H (1990) Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (2010) From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P et al (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Ichausti P (eds) (2002) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives. Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1955) Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclaurin J, Sterelny K (2008) What is biodiversity? University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, McGill BJ (2011) Biodiversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier DS (2012) What’s So Good About Biodiversity? A call for better reasoning about nature’s value. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malaterre C, Dussault AC, Rousseau-Mermans S et al (2019) Functional Diversity: an Epistemic Roadmap. Bioscience 69(10):800–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1973) Stability and Complexity of Model Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills LS, Soule ME, Doak DF (1993) The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. Bioscience 43(4):219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morar N, Toadvine T, Bohannan BJM (2015) Biodiversity at Twenty-Five Years: Revolution or Red Herring? Ethics. Policy & Environment 18(1):16–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Lawler SP et al (1994) Declining biodiversity can affect the functioning of ecosystems. Nature 368:734–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Chapin FSIII, Costanza R et al (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: maintaining natural life support processes. Issues in Ecology 4:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (2009) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective. Oxford, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman JA, Varner G, Lindquist S (2017) Defending Biodiversity: Environmental Science and Ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1953) Fundamentals of Ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm S (1980) Food web design and the effect of species deletion. Oikos 35:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudner R (1953) The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Philos Sci 20(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana C (2014) Save the planet: eliminate biodiversity. Biology & Philosophy 29:761–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S (2002) Defining ‘biodiversity’; assessing biodiversity. The Monist 85(1):131–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S (2005) Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sax D, Gaines S (2008) Species invasions and extinction: the future of native biodiversity on islands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 11490–11497

  • Schulze ED, Mooney HA (1994) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé M (1985) What is conservation biology? Bioscience 35:737–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava DS, Velland M (2005) Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:267–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2006) Local ecological communities. Philos Sci 73:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takacs D (1996) The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Starzomski BM (2007) What does biodiversity actually do? A review for managers and policy makers. Biodivers Conserv 16:1359–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Downing JA (1994) Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367:363–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D et al (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward ZB (2020) “On Value-laden Science,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.006

  • Wardle DA, Huston MA, Grime JP et al (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem function: an issue in ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81(3):235–239

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to ecologists Michael Huston, Shahid Naeem, Brad Cardinale, and David Hooper for conversations, audiences at New York University, the University of Tennessee, and the Ecological Society of America’s 2015 meeting session on external influences on ecological theory. Additional thanks to John Nolt, Dale Jamieson, and two anonymous reviewers for their help improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cogut Institute for the Humanities, Department of Philosophy, Brown University, 45 Prospect St, Box 1918, 02912, Providence, RI, USA

    David M. Frank

Authors
  1. David M. Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Frank.

Ethics declarations

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frank, D.M. Science and values in the biodiversity-ecosystem function debate. Biol Philos 37, 7 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-022-09835-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-022-09835-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation