Striving for clarity about the “Lamarckian” nature of CRISPR-Cas systems


Koonin argues that CRISPR-Cas systems present the best-known case in point for Lamarckian evolution because they satisfy his proposed criteria for the specific inheritance of acquired adaptive characteristics (IAC). We see two interrelated issues with Koonin’s characterization of CRISPR-Cas systems as Lamarckian. First, at times he appears to confuse an account of the CRISPR-Cas system with an account of the mechanism it employs. We argue there is no evidence for the CRISPR-Cas system being “Lamarckian” in any sense. Second, it is unclear whether the mechanism is more “Lamarckian” than many other forms of genetic change already well-characterized in Darwinian terms. We present three conceptually distinct senses in which the mechanism of IAC may be considered Lamarckian and argue that only the strongest sense of goal-directed IAC would be difficult to accommodate in a Darwinian account. As the CRISPR-Cas mechanism does not qualify as “Lamarckian” in this strong sense, we argue there is no conceptual value in calling it “Lamarckian”. Finally, we suggest that CRISPR-Cas systems do hold the potential for genuinely non-Darwinian, directed evolution in a way that Koonin did not discuss, involving their potential (mis)use as a human gene-editing tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Burkhardt RW (2013) Lamarck, evolution, and the inheritance of acquired characters. Genetics 194(4):793–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gissis SB, Jablonka E (eds) (2011) Transformations of Lamarckism: from subtle fluids to molecular biology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gould SJ (1979) Another look at Lamarck. New Sci 84(1175):38–40

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koonin EV (2018) CRISPR: a new principle of genome engineering linked to conceptual shifts in evolutionary biology. Biol Philos.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poole AM (2009) Horizontal gene transfer and the earliest stages of the evolution of life. Res Microbiol 160(7):473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas CM, Nielsen KM (2005) Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 3(9):711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss A (2015) Lamarckian illusions. Trends Ecol Evol 30(10):566–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Woolley.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woolley, S., Parke, E.C., Kelley, D. et al. Striving for clarity about the “Lamarckian” nature of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Philos 34, 11 (2019).

Download citation


  • Lamarckism
  • Characteristics
  • Immunity
  • Gene-editing