Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, 33:7 | Cite as

Cultural evolution and the social sciences: a case of unification?

  • Catherine Driscoll
Article
  • 225 Downloads

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of how to understand the relationship between Cultural Evolutionary Science (CES) and the social sciences, given that they coexist and both study cultural change. I argue that CES is best understood as having a unificatory or integrative role between evolutionary biology and the social sciences, and that it is best characterized as a bridge field; I describe the concept of a bridge field and how it relates to other non-reductionist accounts of unification or integration used in the philosophy of science literature.

Keywords

Cultural evolution Dual inheritance theory Scientific unification Social learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to two anonymous reviewers for some very helpful comments on this paper. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2016 Pacific APA; many thanks to those present, and especially to Todd Grantham, for feedback.

References

  1. Abrahamsen AA (1987) Bridging boundaries versus breaking boundaries: psycholinguistics in perspective. Synthese 72(3):355–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson C, Tornberg A, Tornberg P (2014) An evolutionary developmental approach to cultural evolution. Curr Anthropol 55(2):154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ankeny RA, Leonelli S (2016) Repertoires: a post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research. Stud Hist Philos Sci 60:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aoki K, Feldman MW (1989) Pleiotropy and preadaptation in the evolution of human language capacity. Theor Popul Biol 35:181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aoki K, Feldman MW (1991) Recessive hereditary deafness, assortative mating, and persistence of a sign language. Theor Popul Biol 39:358–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aoki K, Feldman MW (2013) Evolution of learning strategies in temporally and spatially variable environments: a review of theory. Theor Popul Biol 91:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atran S (2001) The trouble with memes: inference verses imitation in cultural creation. Hum Nat 12(4):351–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bechtel W (1986) Integrating scientific disciplines. Martinus Nijhoff, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bechtel W (1988) Philosophy of science: an overview for cognitive science. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowles S, Gintis H (2011) A cooperative species: human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1996) Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. Proc Br Acad 88:77–93Google Scholar
  13. Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S et al (2003) The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(6):3531–3535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyd R, Richerson PJ, Henrich J (2011) The cultural niche: why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:10918–10925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boyer P (1999) Cognitive tracks of cultural inheritance: how evolved intuitive ontology governs cultural transmission. Am Anthropol 100(4):876–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brigandt I (2010) Beyond reduction and pluralism: toward an epistemology of explanatory integration in biology. Erkenntnis 73(3):295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Claidiere N, Sperber D (2007) The role of attraction in cultural evolution. J Cognit Cult 7:89–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cummins R (1975) Functional analysis. J Philos 72(20):741–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Currie A, Sterelny K (2017) In defence of story-telling. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 62:1–98Google Scholar
  21. Darden L, Craver CF (2002) Strategies in the interfield discovery of the mechanism of protein synthesis. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 33:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Darden L, Maull N (1977) Interfield theories. Philos Sci 44(1):43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durham WH (1991) Coevolution: genes, culture and human diversity. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Eriksson K, Enquist M, Ghirlanda S (2007) Critical points in current theory of conformist social learning. J Evolut Psychol 5:67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feldman MW, Laland KN (1996) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends Ecol Evol 11(11):453–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fodor JA (1974) Special sciences (or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese 28(2):97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fracchia J, Lewontin RC (1999) Does culture evolve? Hist Theory 38(4):52–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fracchia J, Lewontin RC (2005) The price of metaphor. Hist Theory 44:14–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Galison P (1996) Computer simulations and the trading zone. In: Galison P, Stump DJ (eds) The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts and power. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 118–157Google Scholar
  30. Grantham T (2004) Conceptualizing the (dis)unity of science. Philos Sci 71(2):133–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henrich J, Boyd R (1998) The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolut Hum Behav 19:215–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henrich J, Boyd R (2001) Why people punish defectors: weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. J Theor Biol 208(1):79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henrich J, Boyd R (2002) On modeling cognition and culture. J Cognit Cult 2:87–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolut Hum Behav 22:165–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henrich J, Henrich N (2010) The evolution of cultural adaptations: Fijian food taboos protect against dangerous marine toxins. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:3715–3724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Henrich J, McElreath R (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evol Anthropol 12:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S et al (2004) Foundations of human sociality: economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A et al (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312:1767–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heyes C (2001) Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends Cognit Sci 5(6):253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heyes C (2005) Imitation by association. In: Hurley S, Chater N (eds) Perspectives on imitation: from neuroscience to social science. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 157–176Google Scholar
  41. Jackson F, Pettit P (1992) In defense of explanatory ecumenism. Econ Philos 8(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laland KN, Hoppitt W (2003) Do animals have culture? Evol Anthropol 12(3):150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Laland KN, O’Brien MJ (2011) Cultural niche construction: an introduction. Biol Theory 6:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lumsden C, Wilson EO (1981) Genes, mind and culture. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Lycett SJ, Collard M, McGrew WC (2009) Cladistic analyses of behavioural variation in wild Pan troglodytes: exploring the chimpanzee culture hypothesis. J Hum Evol 57:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matthews L, Tehrani J, Jordan F et al (2011) Testing for divergent transmission histories among cultural characters: a study using bayesian phylogenetic methods and Iranian tribal textile data. PLoS ONE 6(4):1–10Google Scholar
  47. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McElreath R (2004) Social learning and the maintenance of cultural variation: an evolutionary model and data from East Africa. Am Anthropol 106(2):308–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mesoudi A (2011) Cultural evolution: how darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2006) Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behav Brain Sci 29:329–347Google Scholar
  51. Millikan RG (1989) In defense of proper functions. Philos Sci 56(2):288–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mitchell SD (2003) Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nagel E (1961) The structure of science; problems in the logic of explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Odling-Smee J, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  55. Parker GA, Maynard Smith J (1990) Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Potochnik A (2010) Explanatory independence and epistemic interdependence: a case study of the optimality approach. Br J Philos Sci 61(1):213–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2000) Climate, culture and the evolution of cognition. In: Heyes C, Huber L (eds) The evolution of cognition. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 329–346Google Scholar
  58. Richerson PJ, Boyd R, Bettinger RL (2001) Was agriculture impossible during the pleistocene but mandatory during the Holocene? A climate change hypothesis. Am Antiq 66(3):387–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rieucau G, Giraldeau L-A (2011) Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 366:949–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rogers AR (1988) Does biology constrain culture? Am Anthropol 90(4):819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosenberg A (1980) Sociobiology and the preemption of social science. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenberg A (2006) Darwinian reductionism: or, how to stop worrying and love molecular biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schaffner KF (1993) Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  64. Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–173Google Scholar
  66. Sterelny K (1996) Explanatory pluralism in evolutionary biology. Biol Philos 11:193–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sterelny K (2010) Moral nativism: a sceptical response. Mind Lang 25(3):279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sterelny K (2012) The evolved apprentice. MIT press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tomasello M (1999) The human adaptation for culture. Annu Rev Anthropol 28:509–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–136Google Scholar
  71. Waters CK (2004) What was classical genetics? Stud Hist Philos Sci 35(4):783–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Whiten A (2000) Primate culture and social learning. Cognit Sci 24(3):477–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Whiten A (2011) The scope of culture in chimpanzees, humans and ancestral apes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 366:997–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Religious StudiesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations