Cultural evolution and the social sciences: a case of unification?
- 225 Downloads
This paper addresses the question of how to understand the relationship between Cultural Evolutionary Science (CES) and the social sciences, given that they coexist and both study cultural change. I argue that CES is best understood as having a unificatory or integrative role between evolutionary biology and the social sciences, and that it is best characterized as a bridge field; I describe the concept of a bridge field and how it relates to other non-reductionist accounts of unification or integration used in the philosophy of science literature.
KeywordsCultural evolution Dual inheritance theory Scientific unification Social learning
Thanks to two anonymous reviewers for some very helpful comments on this paper. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2016 Pacific APA; many thanks to those present, and especially to Todd Grantham, for feedback.
- Bechtel W (1988) Philosophy of science: an overview for cognitive science. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1996) Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. Proc Br Acad 88:77–93Google Scholar
- Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Currie A, Sterelny K (2017) In defence of story-telling. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 62:1–98Google Scholar
- Durham WH (1991) Coevolution: genes, culture and human diversity. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Galison P (1996) Computer simulations and the trading zone. In: Galison P, Stump DJ (eds) The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts and power. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 118–157Google Scholar
- Heyes C (2005) Imitation by association. In: Hurley S, Chater N (eds) Perspectives on imitation: from neuroscience to social science. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 157–176Google Scholar
- Lumsden C, Wilson EO (1981) Genes, mind and culture. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Matthews L, Tehrani J, Jordan F et al (2011) Testing for divergent transmission histories among cultural characters: a study using bayesian phylogenetic methods and Iranian tribal textile data. PLoS ONE 6(4):1–10Google Scholar
- Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2006) Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behav Brain Sci 29:329–347Google Scholar
- Nagel E (1961) The structure of science; problems in the logic of explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Odling-Smee J, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2000) Climate, culture and the evolution of cognition. In: Heyes C, Huber L (eds) The evolution of cognition. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 329–346Google Scholar
- Rosenberg A (1980) Sociobiology and the preemption of social science. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Schaffner KF (1993) Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–173Google Scholar
- Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–136Google Scholar