Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, 33:4 | Cite as

A pragmatic approach to the possibility of de-extinction

  • Matthew H. Slater
  • Hayley Clatterbuck
Article

Abstract

A number of influential biologists are currently pursuing efforts to restore previously extinct species. But for decades, philosophers of biology have regarded “de-extinction” as conceptually incoherent. Once a species is gone, it is gone forever. We argue that a range of metaphysical, biological, and ethical grounds for opposing de-extinction are at best inconclusive and that a pragmatic stance that allows for its possibility is more appealing.

Keywords

Extinction De-extinction Species Species-as-individuals Natural kinds 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A shorter, ancestral version of this paper was presented by MHS at the 2017 Pacific APA in Seattle, WA and in the “Classification in Biological Practice” workshop organized at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in April 2017. MHS is grateful to participants in both audiences for helpful comments and questions on those occasions and in particular to David Ludwig, Maureen O’Malley, Thomas Reydon, and Ken Shockley; Matt Barker and Neil Williams also provided helpful written comments on a subsequent draft. HC was the commentator assigned at the APA whose constructive comments and extensions were subsequently collaboratively woven through the paper as a new, joint version. The paper is thus fully collaborative.

References

  1. Andelman SJ, Fagan WF (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? PNAS 97(11):5954–5959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd R (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Brogaard B (2004) Species as individuals. Biol Philos 19:223–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke MB (1980) Cohabitation, stuff and intermittent existence. Mind 89(355):391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Church G, Regis E (2012) Regenesis: how synthetic biology will reinvent nature and ourselves. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Crane J (2004) On the metaphysics of species. Philos Sci 71:156–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delord J (2007) The nature of extinction. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:656–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delord J (2014) Can we really re-create an extinct species by cloning? A metaphysical analysis. In: Oksanen M, Siipi H (eds) The ethics of animal re-creation and modification. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  9. Devitt M (2008) Resurrecting biological essentialism. Philos Sci 75(3):344–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donlan CJ et al (2006) Pleistocene rewilding: an optimistic agenda for twenty-first century conservation. Am Nat 168(5):660–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrenfeld D (2013) Extinction reversal? Don’t count on it. TEDx DeExtinction/National Geographic, Washington, DC. http://longnow.org/revive/tedxdeextinction/
  12. Elliot R (1982) Faking nature. Inquiry 25(1):81–93. Reprinted in his (1997) Faking nature: the ethics of environmental restoration. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Ereshefsky M (1991) Species, higher taxa, and the units of evolution. Philos Sci 58:84–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garvey B (2007) Philosophy of biology. Acumen, StocksfieldGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghiselin M (1987) Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity. Biol Philos 2(2):127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghiselin M (1997) Metaphysics and the origin of species. SUNY University Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griesemer J (1999) Materials for the study of evolutionary transition. Biol Philos 14(1):127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griesemer J (2000) The units of evolutionary transition. Selection 1:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths PE (1999) Squaring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunn AS (1991) The restoration of species and natural environments. Environmental Ethics 13(4):291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gyngell C, Savulescu J (2016) Promoting biodiversity. Philos Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0234-2 Google Scholar
  23. Hershenov DB (2003) The metaphysical problem of intermittent existence and the possibility of resurrection. Faith Philos 20(1):24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hull DL (1976) Are species really individuals. Syst Zool 25:174–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hull DL (1978) A matter of individuality. Philos Sci 45:335–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hull DL (1981) Kitts and Kitts and Caplan on species. Philos Sci 48(1):141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hull DL (1983) Karl Popper and Plato’s metaphor. Reprinted in his (1989) The metaphysics of evolution. SUNY University Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  28. International Union for Conservation of Nature (2016) Guiding principles on creating proxies of extinct species for conservation benefit (version 1.0). https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/Rep-2016-009.pdf
  29. Isaac NJB et al (2004) Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19(9):464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jebari K (2016) Should extinction be forever? Philos Technol 29:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katz E (1992) The call of the wild. Environ Ethics 14:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kitcher P (1984) Species. Philos Sci 51:308–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kitcher P (1989) Some puzzles about species. In: Ruse M (ed) What the philosophy of biology is. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  34. Kitts DB, Kitts DJ (1979) Biological species as natural kinds. Philos Sci 46:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. LaPorte J (2004) Natural kinds and conceptual change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee K (2003) Philosophy and revolutions in genetics: deep science and deep technology. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis D (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewis D (1993) Many, but almost one. Reprinted in his Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Mace G (2004) The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philos Trans R Soc B 359:711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mallet J (1995) A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 10(7):294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martinelli L, Oksanen M, Siipi H (2014) De-extinction: a novel and remarkable case of bio-objectication. Croat Med J 55:423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nelson G, Platnick N (1981) Systematics and biogeography: cladistics and vicariance. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Connor MR (2015) Resurrection science. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Okasha S (2002) Darwinian metaphysics: species and the question of essentialism. Synthese 131:191–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Malley MA (2010) Ernst Mayr, the tree of life, and philosophy of biology. Biol Philos 25:529–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raup DM (1991) Extinction: bad genes or bad luck?. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Rolston H (1986) Philosophy gone wild: essays in environmental ethics. Prometheus, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  49. Rolston H (1995) Duties to endangered species. Encycl Environ Biol 1:517–528Google Scholar
  50. Sandler R (2007) Character and environment: a virtue-oriented approach to environmental ethics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Sandler R (2013) The ethics of reviving long extinct species. Conserv Biol 28(2):354–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shapiro Beth (2015) How to clone a mammoth: the science of de-extinction. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sider T (2001) Four-dimensionalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Siipi H (2014) The authenticity of animals. In: Oksanen M, Siipi H (eds) The ethics of animal re-creation and modification: reviving, rewilding, restoring. Palgrave-Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  55. Siipi H, Finkleman L (2016) The extinction and de-extinction of species. Philos Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0244-0 Google Scholar
  56. Slater MH (2013) Are species real?. Palgrave-Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Slater MH (2015) Natural kindness. Br J Philos Sci 66(2):375–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sokal R, Sneath P (1961) Principles of numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner DD (2016) De-extinction as artificial species selection. Philos Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0232-4 Google Scholar
  60. van Inwagen P (1978) The possibility of resurrection. Int J Philos Relig 9(2):114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Valen L (1976) Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilkerson TE (1995) Natural kinds. Ashgate Publishing Company, BrookfieldGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiley EO (1981) Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. Wiley Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Yashina S et al (2012) Regeneration of whole fertile plants from 30,000-year-old fruit tissue buried in Siberian permafrost. PNAS 109(10):4008–4013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yule J (2002) Cloning the extinct: restoration as ecological prostheses. Common Ground 1(2):6–9Google Scholar
  66. Zimov S (2005) Pleistocene park: return of the mammoth’s ecosystem. Science 308(5723):796–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBucknell UniversityLewisburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations