Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 149–167 | Cite as

Thirty years of Biology & Philosophy: philosophy of which biology?

Article

Abstract

Which domains of biology do philosophers of biology primarily study? The fact that philosophy of biology has been dominated by an interest for evolutionary biology is widely admitted, but it has not been strictly demonstrated. Here I analyse the topics of all the papers published in Biology & Philosophy, just as the journal celebrates its thirtieth anniversary. I then compare the distribution of biological topics in Biology & Philosophy with that of the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, focusing on the recent period 2003–2015. This comparison reveals a significant mismatch between the distributions of these topics. I examine plausible explanations for that mismatch. Finally, I argue that many biological topics underrepresented in philosophy of biology raise important philosophical issues and should therefore play a more central role in future philosophy of biology.

Keywords

Biology & Philosophy Philosophy of biology History of philosophy of biology 

Supplementary material

10539_2016_9558_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1172 kb)

References

  1. Beatty J (1995) The evolutionary contingency thesis. In: Wolters G, Lennox JG (eds) Concepts, theories and rationality in the biological sciences. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 45–81Google Scholar
  2. Bechtel WP (2001) Representations: from neural systems to cognitive systems. In: Mandik P, Mundale J, Stufflebeam RS (eds) Philosophy and the neurosciences: a reader. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 332–349Google Scholar
  3. Bechtel W (2006) Discovering cell mechanisms: the creation of modern cell biology. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechtel W (2010) The cell: locus or object of inquiry? Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 41:172–182. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bechtel W (2016) Investigating neural representations: the tale of place cells. Synthese 193:1287–1321. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0480-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckner M (1959) The biological way of thought. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickle J (2009) Introduction. The Oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Block N (2005) Two neural correlates of consciousness. Trends Cogn Sci 9:46–52. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandon RN (1978) Adaptation and evolutionary theory. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 9:181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brigandt I (2013a) Integration in biology: philosophical perspectives on the dynamics of interdisciplinarity. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 44:461–465. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brigandt I (2013b) Systems biology and the integration of mechanistic explanation and mathematical explanation. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 44:477–492. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burian RM (1985) On conceptual change in biology: the case of the gene. In: Depew D, Weber BH (eds) Evolution at a crossroads: the new biology and the new philosophy of science. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 21–42Google Scholar
  13. Byron JM (2007) Whence philosophy of biology? Br J Philos Sci 58:409–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canguilhem G (1992) La théorie cellulaire (1934). La connaissance de la vie. Vrin, Paris, pp 43–80Google Scholar
  15. Canguilhem G (2005) The object of the history of sciences. In: Gutting G (ed) Continental philosophy of science. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Churchland PS (1986) Neurophilosophy: toward a unified science of the mind-brain. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Churchland PM (1989) A neurocomputational perspective: the nature of mind and the structure of science. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Churchland PS (2008) The impact of neuroscience on philosophy. Neuron 60:409–411. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Danchin É, Charmantier A, Champagne FA et al (2011) Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 12:475–486. doi:10.1038/nrg3028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Darden L, Maull N (1977) Interfield theories. Philos Sci 44:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 35:125–129. doi:10.2307/4444260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dupré J (1993) The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Ereshefsky M (2010) Microbiology and the species problem. Biol Philos 25:553–568. doi:10.1007/s10539-010-9211-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fagan MB (2013) Philosophy of stem cell biology: knowledge in flesh and blood. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franklin LR (2007) Bacteria, sex, and systematics. Philos Sci 74:69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frith C, Perry R, Lumer E (1999) The neural correlates of conscious experience: an experimental framework. Trends Cogn Sci 3:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fusco MA (2008) Evolving pathways: key themes in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Garson J (2003) The introduction of information into neurobiology. Philos Sci 70:926–936. doi:10.1086/377378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gayon J (2009) Philosophy of biology: an historico-critical characterization. In: Brenner A, Gayon J (eds) French studies in the philosophy of science: contemporary research in France. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Godfrey-Smith P (2013) Darwinian individuals. In: Bouchard F, Huneman P (eds) From groups to individuals: evolution and emerging individuality. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 17–36Google Scholar
  31. Gold I, Roskies AL (2008) Philosophy of neuroscience. In: Ruse M (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 349–380Google Scholar
  32. Goudge TA (1961) The ascent of life: a philosophical study of the theory of evolution. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. Green S (2015) Revisiting generality in biology: systems biology and the quest for design principles. Biol Philos 30:629–652. doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9496-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grene M (1958) Two evolutionary theories. Br J Philos Sci 9:110–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffiths P (2014) Philosophy of biology. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/biology-philosophy/
  36. Hacking I (1983) Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hardcastle VG (1997) Consciousness and the neurobiology of perceptual binding. Semin Neurol 17:163–170. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1040926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hardcastle VG (1999a) It’s ok to be complicated: the case of emotion. J Conscious Stud 6:237–249Google Scholar
  39. Hardcastle VG (1999b) The myth of pain. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Hull D (1969) What philosophy of biology is not. Synthese 20:157–184. doi:10.1007/BF00413784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hull DL (1974) Philosophy of biological science. Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  42. Hull DL (1978) A matter of individuality. Philos Sci 45:335–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hull D (1980) Individuality and selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:311–332. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hull DL (1986) On human nature. PSA Proc Bienn Meet Philos Sci Assoc 1986:3–13Google Scholar
  45. Hull DL (2008) The history of the philosophy of biology. In: Ruse M (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 11–33Google Scholar
  46. Joyce R (2006) The evolution of morality. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Keeley BL (2002) Making sense of the senses: individuating modalities in humans and other animals. J Philos 99:5–28. doi:10.5840/jphil20029915 Google Scholar
  48. Kitcher P (1982) Genes. Br J Philos Sci 33:337–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kitcher P (1984) 1953 and all that. A tale of two sciences. Philos Rev 93:335–373. doi:10.2307/2184541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Koonin EV (2011) The logic of chance: the nature and origin of biological evolution, 1st edn. FT Press, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  51. Laland KN, Sterelny K, Odling-Smee J et al (2011) Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science 334:1512–1516. doi:10.1126/science.1210879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Laplane L (2016) Cancer stem cells: philosophy and therapies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Lenski RE, Travisano M (1994) Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91:6808–6814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Tadler SC (1991) Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am Nat 138:1315–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lewens T (2012) Human nature: the very idea. Philos Technol 25:459–474. doi:10.1007/s13347-012-0063-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:1–18. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lloyd EA (1988) The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. Greenwood Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. MacLeod M, Nersessian NJ (2013) Coupling simulation and experiment: the bimodal strategy in integrative systems biology. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 44:572–584. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Minelli A, Pradeu T (2014) Towards a theory of development. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Malley MA (2014) Philosophy of microbiology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. O’Malley MA, Dupré J (2005) Fundamental issues in systems biology. BioEssays News Rev Mol Cell Dev Biol 27:1270–1276. doi:10.1002/bies.20323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Malley MA, Dupré J (2007) Towards a philosophy of microbiology. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:775–779. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pradeu T (2012) The limits of the self: immunology and biological identity. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pradeu T (2016) Organisms or biological individuals? Combining physiological and evolutionary individuality. Biol Philos 31:797–817. doi:10.1007/s10539-016-9551-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Prinz JJ (2004) Gut reactions: a perceptual theory of emotion. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Prinz JJ (2007) The emotional construction of morals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Rees G, Kreiman G, Koch C (2002) Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:261–270. doi:10.1038/nrn783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenberg A (1985) The structure of biological science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roskies A (2002) Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35:21–23. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00763-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruse ME (1971) Reduction, replacement, and molecular biology. Dialectica 25:39–72. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1971.tb00591.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ruse M (1973) The philosophy of biology. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruse M (1988) Philosophy of biology today. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  73. Sarkar S (1991) Reductionism and functional explanation in molecular biology. Uroboros 1:67–94Google Scholar
  74. Sarkar S, Plutynski A (2008) A companion to the philosophy of biology. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  75. Schaffner K (1967) Approaches to reduction. Philos Sci 34:137–147. doi:10.1086/288137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schaffner K (1969) The Watson-Crick model and reductionism. Br J Philos Sci 20:325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schroeder T (2004) Three faces of desire. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE (1997) Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature 387:703–705. doi:10.1038/42701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sober E (1984) The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  80. Sober E (2000) Philosophy of biology, 2nd edn. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  81. Sterelny K (2003) Thought in a hostile world: the evolution of human cognition. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  82. Tauber AI (1994) The immune self: theory or metaphor?. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wagner A (2005) Robustness and evolvability in living systems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  84. Wagner A (2008) Neutralism and selectionism: a network-based reconciliation. Nat Rev Genet 9:965–974. doi:10.1038/nrg2473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wagner GP (2014) Homology, genes, and evolutionary innovation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Waters CK (1990) Why the anti-reductionist consensus won’t survive: the case of classical Mendelian genetics. PSA Proc Bienn Meet Philos Sci Assoc 1990:125–139Google Scholar
  87. Waters CK (2008) How practical know-how contextualizes theoretical knowledge: exporting causal knowledge from laboratory to nature. Philos Sci 75:707–719. doi:10.1086/594516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weber M (2005) Philosophy of experimental biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  89. Wimsatt WC (1976) Reductive explanation: a functional account. In: Cohen RS, Hooker CA, Michalos AC, Evra JWV (eds) PSA 1974. Springer, Netherlands, pp 671–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wimsatt WC (1980) Randomness and perceived-randomness in evolutionary biology. Synthese 43:287–329. doi:10.1007/BF00413929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Woodger JH (1929) Biological principles: a critical study. Harcourt, Brace, and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ImmunoConceptCNRS and University of BordeauxBordeauxFrance
  2. 2.Institut d’histoire et de philosophie des Sciences et des TechniquesCNRS and Panthéon-Sorbonne UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations