Skip to main content
Log in

A niche for the genome

  • Book Symposium
  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 09 January 2015

The Original Article was published on 17 December 2014

Abstract

In their considered reviews both Thomas Pradeu and Lindell Bromham introduce important topics not sufficiently covered in our book. Pradeu asks us to enlarge on the epigenetic and ecological context of genes, particularly in the form of symbioses. We use the relationship between eukaryotes and their symbiotic organisms as a welcome opportunity to clarify our concept of the developmental niche, and its relationship to the developmental system. Bromham’s comments reveal that she is primarily interested in identifying macroevolutionary patterns. From her vantage point eco-evo-devo, the study of phenotypic plasticity, epigenetic and exogenetic inheritance, have not yet demonstrated the need for any revolutionary change in evolutionary thought. For us they highlight the extent to which proximate developmental mechanisms can inform ultimate biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This paper appeared in (Singh et al. 2001) before being reprinted in Kitcher’s collected papers.

  2. The authors explicitly utilize a niche concept here, but do not sufficiently distinguish the developmental niche from the better-known selective niche.

References

  • Alberts JR (2008) The nature of nurturant niches in ontogeny. Philos Psychol 21(3):295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromham L (this issue) What is a gene for? Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9472-9

  • Champagne FA, Weaver ICG, Diorio J, Dymov S, Szyf M, Meaney MJ (2006) Maternal care associated with methylation of the estrogen receptor-1b promoter and estrogen receptor-expression in the medial preoptic area of female offspring. Endocrinology 147(6):2909–2915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu X-D, Ares MJ (2014) Context-dependent control of alternative splicing by RNA-binding proteins. Nat Rev Genet 15:689–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S, Epel D (2009) Ecological developmental biology: integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2000) On the theoretical role of “genetic coding”. Philos Sci 67(1):26–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J (2014) Reproduction and scaffolded developmental processes: an integrated evolutionary perspective. In: Minelli A, Pradeu T (eds) Towars a theory of development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (In Press) Proximate and ultimate information in biology. In: Couch M, Pfeiffer J (eds) Festschrifft for Philip Kitcher. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Griffiths PE, Stotz K (2013) Genetics and philosophy: an introduction. In: Ruse M (ed) Cambridge introductions to philosophy and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Griffiths PE, Tabery JG (2013) Developmental systems theory: what does it explain, and how does it explain it? In: Lerner RM, Benson JB (eds) Embodiment and epigenesis. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE, Pocheville A, Calcott B, Stotz K, Kim H, Knight R (2015) Measuring causal specificity. Philos Sci 82(4):529–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Avital E (2001) Animal traditions: behavioural inheritance in evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Raz G (2009) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 84(2):131–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (2003) Battling the undead: how (and how not) to resist genetic determinism. In: Kitcher P (ed) In Mendel’s mirror: philosophical reflections on biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 283–300

  • Lynch M (2007) The origin of genome architecture. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134(3489):1501–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meaney MJ (2001) Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Ann Rev Neurosci 24:1161–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meaney MJ, Szyf M (2005) Environmental programming of stress responses through DNA methylation: life at the interface between a dynamic environment and a fixed genome. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 7(2):103–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradeu T (this issue) Toolbox murders: putting genes in their epigenetic and ecological contexts. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9471-x

  • Singh RS, Krimbas CB, Paul DB, Beatty J (eds) (2001) Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical and political perspectives (Festchrifft for Richard Lewontin). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotz K, Griffiths PE (2008) Biohumanities: rethinking the relationship between biosciences, philosophy and history of science, and society. Q Rev Biol 83(1):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1998) The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • West MJ, King AP (1987) Settling nature and nurture into an ontogenetic niche. Dev Psychobiol 20(5):549–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MJ, King AP (2008) Deconstructing innate illusions: reflections on nature-nurture-niche from an unlikely source. Philos Psychol 21(3):383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karola Stotz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stotz, K., Griffiths, P. A niche for the genome. Biol Philos 31, 143–157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9507-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9507-x

Keywords

Navigation