Abstract
In their considered reviews both Thomas Pradeu and Lindell Bromham introduce important topics not sufficiently covered in our book. Pradeu asks us to enlarge on the epigenetic and ecological context of genes, particularly in the form of symbioses. We use the relationship between eukaryotes and their symbiotic organisms as a welcome opportunity to clarify our concept of the developmental niche, and its relationship to the developmental system. Bromham’s comments reveal that she is primarily interested in identifying macroevolutionary patterns. From her vantage point eco-evo-devo, the study of phenotypic plasticity, epigenetic and exogenetic inheritance, have not yet demonstrated the need for any revolutionary change in evolutionary thought. For us they highlight the extent to which proximate developmental mechanisms can inform ultimate biology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This paper appeared in (Singh et al. 2001) before being reprinted in Kitcher’s collected papers.
The authors explicitly utilize a niche concept here, but do not sufficiently distinguish the developmental niche from the better-known selective niche.
References
Alberts JR (2008) The nature of nurturant niches in ontogeny. Philos Psychol 21(3):295–303
Bromham L (this issue) What is a gene for? Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9472-9
Champagne FA, Weaver ICG, Diorio J, Dymov S, Szyf M, Meaney MJ (2006) Maternal care associated with methylation of the estrogen receptor-1b promoter and estrogen receptor-expression in the medial preoptic area of female offspring. Endocrinology 147(6):2909–2915
Fu X-D, Ares MJ (2014) Context-dependent control of alternative splicing by RNA-binding proteins. Nat Rev Genet 15:689–701
Gilbert S, Epel D (2009) Ecological developmental biology: integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
Godfrey-Smith P (2000) On the theoretical role of “genetic coding”. Philos Sci 67(1):26–44
Griesemer J (2014) Reproduction and scaffolded developmental processes: an integrated evolutionary perspective. In: Minelli A, Pradeu T (eds) Towars a theory of development. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Griffiths PE (In Press) Proximate and ultimate information in biology. In: Couch M, Pfeiffer J (eds) Festschrifft for Philip Kitcher. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Griffiths PE, Stotz K (2013) Genetics and philosophy: an introduction. In: Ruse M (ed) Cambridge introductions to philosophy and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Griffiths PE, Tabery JG (2013) Developmental systems theory: what does it explain, and how does it explain it? In: Lerner RM, Benson JB (eds) Embodiment and epigenesis. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 65–94
Griffiths PE, Pocheville A, Calcott B, Stotz K, Kim H, Knight R (2015) Measuring causal specificity. Philos Sci 82(4):529–555
Jablonka E, Avital E (2001) Animal traditions: behavioural inheritance in evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jablonka E, Raz G (2009) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 84(2):131–176
Kitcher P (2003) Battling the undead: how (and how not) to resist genetic determinism. In: Kitcher P (ed) In Mendel’s mirror: philosophical reflections on biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 283–300
Lynch M (2007) The origin of genome architecture. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134(3489):1501–1506
Meaney MJ (2001) Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Ann Rev Neurosci 24:1161–1192
Meaney MJ, Szyf M (2005) Environmental programming of stress responses through DNA methylation: life at the interface between a dynamic environment and a fixed genome. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 7(2):103–123
Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Pradeu T (this issue) Toolbox murders: putting genes in their epigenetic and ecological contexts. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9471-x
Singh RS, Krimbas CB, Paul DB, Beatty J (eds) (2001) Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical and political perspectives (Festchrifft for Richard Lewontin). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stotz K, Griffiths PE (2008) Biohumanities: rethinking the relationship between biosciences, philosophy and history of science, and society. Q Rev Biol 83(1):37–45
Wade MJ (1998) The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 5–21
West MJ, King AP (1987) Settling nature and nurture into an ontogenetic niche. Dev Psychobiol 20(5):549–562
West MJ, King AP (2008) Deconstructing innate illusions: reflections on nature-nurture-niche from an unlikely source. Philos Psychol 21(3):383–395
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stotz, K., Griffiths, P. A niche for the genome. Biol Philos 31, 143–157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9507-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9507-x