Schrödinger’s microbe: implications of coercing a living organism into a coherent quantum mechanical state
Consideration of the experimental activities carried out in one discipline, through the lens of another, can lead to novel insights. Here, we comment from a biological perspective upon experiments in quantum mechanics proposed by physicists that are likely to feasible in the near future. In these experiments, an entire living organism would be knowingly placed into a coherent quantum state for the first time, i.e. would be coerced into demonstrating quantum phenomena. The implications of the proposed experiment for a biologist depend to an extent upon the outcomes. If successful (i.e. quantum coherence is achieved and the organism survives after returning to a normal state), then the organism will have been temporarily in a state where it has an unmeasurable metabolism—not because a metabolic rate is undetectable, but because any attempt to measure it would automatically bring the organism out of the state. We argue that this would in essence represent a new category of cryptobiosis. Further, the organism would not necessarily retain all of the characteristics commonly attributed to living systems, unlike the currently known categories of cryptobiosis. If organisms can survive having previously been in a coherent state, then we must accept that living systems do not necessarily need to remain in a decoherent state at all times. This would be something new to biologists, even if it might seem trivial to physicists. It would have implications concerning the physical extremes organisms can tolerate, the search for extraterrestrial life, and our philosophical view of animation.
KeywordsCoherence Cryptobiosis Decoherence Living organism PICERAS Tardigrade
We acknowledge and thank Leron Borsten and Raimundo Real for in-depth discussions on this topic, and their insights into some of the ideas contained within this manuscript. Jared Cole, Bill Langford and two anonymous reviewers also provided useful comments that improved the manuscript, including suggesting the phrase “Schrödinger’s microbe”. J.W.B. acknowledges the support of the Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the Environment initiative at Imperial College London. A.G. was supported by funding from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions.
- Arndt M, Aspelmeyer M, Bernstein HJ, Bertlmann R, Brukner C, et al (2005) Quantum physics from A to Z. arXiv:quant-ph/0505187Google Scholar
- Crowe JH (1975) The physiology of cryptobiosis in tardigrades. Mem Its Ital Idrobiol 32:37–59Google Scholar
- Davies PCW, Betts DS (2002) Quantum mechanics, 2nd edn. Nelson Thornes, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Hameroff SR (1994) Quantum coherence in microtubules: a neural basis for emergent consciousness? J Conscious Stud 1:98–118Google Scholar
- Leitner JJ, Firneis MG (2011) Defining life in a non-geocentric way. EPSC abstracts, EPSC-DPS joint meeting 2011: vol 6, EPSC-DPS2011-1114Google Scholar
- Lineweaver CH, Chopra A (2011) What can life on earth tell us about life in the universe? In: Seckbach J (ed) Genesis—in the beginning: precursors of life, chemical models and early biological evolution, cellular origin, life in extreme habitats and astrobiology. Springer, New York, pp 799–815Google Scholar
- Penrose R (1989) The Emperor’s new mind. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Schrödinger E (1944) What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- US National Research Council (1999) Size limits of very small microorganisms: proceedings of a workshop. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Zurek WH (2003) Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical—revisited (preprint). arXiv:quant-ph/0306072Google Scholar