Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 587–596 | Cite as

The nature of philosophy and the philosophy of nature

Peter Godfrey-Smith: Philosophy of Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014
  • Tim LewensEmail author
Review Essay
  • 799 Downloads

Abstract

Peter Godfrey-Smith’s introduction to the philosophy of biology is excellent. This review questions one implication of his book, namely that Darwin’s case for the efficacy of natural selection was hampered by his ignorance of the particulate nature of inheritance. I suggest, instead, that Darwin was handicapped by an inability to effectively engage in quantitative population thinking. I also question Godfrey-Smith’s understanding of the role that Malthusian struggle plays in linking natural selection to the origination of new adaptive traits, and I raise problems for his defence of apparently unproblematic conceptions of human nature. Finally, I highlight the welcome conception of a ‘philosophy of nature’ developed by Godfrey-Smith.

Keywords

William Bateson R. A. Fisher Peter Godfrey-Smith Human nature Natural selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many of the ideas in this review were developed while I was a visiting professor at the University of Lyon III in January 2015. In particular I learned an enormous amount—especially about Mendel and Bateson—from listening to Greg Radick. My accounts of Mendel and Bateson’s work are due to him, except for where they are erroneous. I am also grateful to Thierry Hoquet and to the students at the Lyon Winter School on ‘Darwinian Inheritance’. Peter Godfrey-Smith kindly gave feedback on an earlier draft of this essay. This work has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 284123.

Conflict of interest

The author declares he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bateson W (1904) Practical aspects of the new discoveries in heredity. Proceedings: international conference on plant breeding and hybridization. Horticultural Society of New York, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  2. Darwin, C. (1868/1998). The variation of animals and plants under domestication, volumes one and two. H. Ritvo (ed) Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Dupré J (2012) Processes of life. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewens T (2004) Organisms and artifacts: design in nature and elsewhere. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)Google Scholar
  7. Lewens T (2010) Natural selection then and now. Biol Rev 85:829–835Google Scholar
  8. Lewens T (2012) Human nature: the very idea. Philos Technol 25:459–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Neander K (1995) Pruning the tree of life. Br J Philos Sci 46:59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Olby R (1979) Mendel no mendelian? Hist Sci 17:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peckham M (1959) The origin of species by Charles Darwin: a variorum text. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Radick G (2011) Physics in the galtonian sciences of heredity. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 42:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Radick G (2013) The professor and the pea: lives and afterlives of William Bateson’s campaign for the utility of mendelism. Stud Hist Philos Sci 44:280–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rushton A (2014) William Bateson and the chromosome theory of heredity: a reappraisal. Br J Hist Sci 47:147–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vorzimmer P (1963) Charles Darwin and blending inheritance. Isis 54:371–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations