Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 227–246 | Cite as

The dispositional genome: primus inter pares

  • Christopher J. AustinEmail author


According to the proponents of Developmental Systems Theory and the Causal Parity Thesis, the privileging of the genome as “first among equals” with respect to the development of phenotypic traits is more a reflection of our own heuristic prejudice than of ontology—the underlying causal structures responsible for that specified development no more single out the genome as primary than they do other broadly “environmental” factors. Parting with the methodology of the popular responses to the Thesis, this paper offers a novel criterion for ‘causal primacy’, one that is grounded in the ontology of the unique causal role of dispositional properties. This paper argues that, if the genome is conceptualised as realising dispositional properties that are “directed toward” phenotypic traits, the parity of ‘causal roles’ between genetic and extra-genetic factors is no longer apparent, and further, that the causal primacy of the genome is both plausible and defensible.


Genetic causation Dispositions Causal parity 


  1. Armstrong D (2004) Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gannett L (1999) What’s in a cause?: The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanations. Biol Philos 14:349–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson J (1970) Effects of temperature on selection for scutellar bristles. Nature 25:591–607Google Scholar
  4. Godfrey-Smith P (2000) On the theoretical role of “genetic coding”. Philos Sci 67(1):26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray R (1992) Death of the gene: developmental systems strike back. In: Griffiths P (ed) Trees of life: essays in the philosophy of biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 165–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Griffiths P, Gray R (1994) Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. J Philos 91(6):277–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Griffiths P, Knight R (1998) What is the developmentalist challenge? Philos Sci 65:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hauska J (2009) Dispositions unmasked. Theoria 75:304–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hollenhorst P, Chandler K, Poulsen R, Johnson W, Speck N, Graves B (2009) DNA specificity determinants associate with distinct transcription factor functions. PLoS Genet 5(12):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacobs J (2011) Powerful qualities, not pure powers. Monist 94:81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewis D (2000) Causation as influence. J Philos 97(4):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis D (2001) Counterfactuals. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewontin R (1982) Human diversity. Scientific American Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Manley D, Wasserman R (2008) On linking dispositions and conditionals. Mind 117:59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin C (2008) The mind in nature. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Maynard Smith J (2000) The concept of information in biology. Philos Sci 67(2):177–194Google Scholar
  17. Mumford S (2004) Laws in nature. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mumford S, Anjum R (2011) Getting causes from powers. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oyama S (1985) The ontogeny of information. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Oyama S (2000) Causal democracy and causal contributions in developmental systems theory. Philos Sci (Proc). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp S332–S347Google Scholar
  21. Powell AM, Davis M, Powell JR (2010) Phenotypic plasticity across 50 MY of evolution: Drosophila wing size and temperature. J Insect Physiol 56:380–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarkar S (2003) Genes encode information for phenotypic traits. In: Hitchcock C (ed) Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Blackwell, London, pp 259–272Google Scholar
  23. Schaffner K (1998) Genes, behavior, and developmental emergentism: one process, indivisible? Philos Sci 65(2):209–252Google Scholar
  24. Schlichting C, Smith H (2002) Phenotypic plasticity: linking molecular mechanisms with evolutionary outcomes. Evol Ecol 16:189–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 379–423, 623–656Google Scholar
  26. Shea N (2007) Representation in the genome and in inheritance systems. Biol Philos 22:313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stalnaker R (1968) A theory of conditionals. Studies in logical theory, American philosophical quarterly monograph series 2. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 98–112Google Scholar
  28. Stegmann UE (2005) Genetic information as intstructional content. Philos Sci 72:425–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stegmann UE (2012a) Causal control and genetic causation. Nous. doi:  10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00867.x
  30. Stegmann UE (2012b) Varieties of parity. Biol Philos 27:903–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sterelny K, Griffiths P (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Sterelny K, Smith K, Dickison M (1996) The extended replicator. Biol Philos 11:377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vetter B (2013) Multi-track dispositions. Philos Q 63:330–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waters CK (2007) Causes that make a difference. J Philos 104(11):551–579Google Scholar
  35. Weber M Causal selection vs causal parity in biology: relevant counterfactuals and biologically normal interventions. Minn Stud Philos Sci (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  36. Wheeler M (2007) Traits, genes, and coding. In: Matthen M, Stephens C (eds) Philos Biol. Elsevier, pp 369–402Google Scholar
  37. Whitman DW, Agrawal AA (2009) What is phenotypic plasticity and why is it important? In: Ananthakrishna TN, Whitman DW (eds) Phenotypic plasticity of insects: mechanisms and consequences. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodward J (2010) Causation in biology: stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biol Philos 25:287–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations