Informationally-connected property clusters, and polymorphism
- 232 Downloads
I present and defend a novel version of the homeostatic property cluster (HPC) account of natural kinds. The core of the proposal is a development of the notion of co-occurrence, central to the HPC account, along information-theoretic lines. The resulting theory retains all the appealing features of the original formulation, while increasing its explanatory power, and formal perspicuity. I showcase the theory by applying it to the (hitherto unsatisfactorily resolved) problem of reconciling the thesis that biological species are natural kinds with the fact that many such species are polymorphic.
KeywordsHomeostatic property clusters Species Polymorphism Richard Boyd Information theory
I am grateful to Marc Ereshefsky, P.D. Magnus, Kim Sterelny and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts.
Research for this paper was supported by the Spanish Government via research grants MCINN FFI2011-26853 and CSD2009-0056 (CONSOLIDER INGENIO).
- Anderson KE, Linksvayer TA, Smith CR (2008) The causes and consequences of genetic caste determination in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 11:119–132Google Scholar
- Assis L (2009) Coherence, correspondence, and the renaissance of morphology in phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 25(5):528–544Google Scholar
- Assis L, Brigandt I (2009) Homology: homeostatic property cluster kinds in systematics and evolution. Evol Biol 36(2):248–255Google Scholar
- Boyd R (1988) How to be a moral realist. In: Sayre-McCord G (ed) Moral realism. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 181–228Google Scholar
- Boyd R (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson R (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. Mit Press, Cambridge, pp 141–185Google Scholar
- Dretske F (1981) Knowledge and the low of information. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Franz NM (2005) Outline of an explanatory account of cladistic practice. Biol Philos 20(2–3):489–515Google Scholar
- Godfrey-Smith P (2013) Darwinian individuals. In: Bouchard F, Huneman P (eds) From groups to individuals: evolution and emerging individuality. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 17–36Google Scholar
- Jousselin E, Desdevises Y, d’Acier AC (2009) Fine-scale cospeciation between Brachycaudus and Buchnera aphidicola: bacterial genome helps define species and evolutionary relationship in aphids. Proc R Soc B 276:187–196Google Scholar
- Keller R, Boyd R, Wheeler Q (2003) The illogical basis of phylogenetic nomenclature. Botanical Rev 69(1):93–110Google Scholar
- Ma L, Conover M, Lu H, Parsek MR, Bayles K, Wozniak DJ (2009) Assembly and development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. PLOS Pathog 5(3)Google Scholar
- Nowak MA (2006) Evolutionary dynamics. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Rieppel O (2005) Monophyly, paraphyly, and natural kinds. Biol Philos 20(2–3):465–487Google Scholar
- Williams NE (2011) Arthritis and Nature’s joints. In: Campbell JK, O’Rourke M, Slater MH (eds) Carving nature at its joints. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 199–230Google Scholar
- Wilson R (1999) Realism, essence, and kind: resuscitating species essentialism? In: Wilson R (ed) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. Mit Press, Cambridge, pp 187–208Google Scholar