Clatterbuck et al. (Biol Philos 28: 577–592, 2013) argue that there is no fact of the matter whether selection dominates drift or vice versa in any particular case of evolution. Their reasons are not empirically based; rather, they are purely conceptual. We show that their conceptual presuppositions are unmotivated, unnecessary and overly complex. We also show that their conclusion runs contrary to current biological practice. The solution is to recognize that evolution involves a probabilistic sampling process, and that drift is a deviation from probabilistic expectation. We conclude that conceptually, there are no problems with distinguishing drift from selection, and empirically—as modern science illustrates—when drift does occur, there is a quantifiable fact of the matter to be discovered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We wish to thank the philosophy of biology reading group at Duke University and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments. Special thanks go to David McCandlish for help with some final tweaks.
Alcaide M (2010) On the relative roles of selection and genetic drift in shaping MHC variation. Mol Ecol 19:3842–3844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon RN (1978) Adaptation and evolutionary theory. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 9(3):181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon RN (2005) The difference between selection and drift: a reply to Millstein. Biol Philos 20:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon RN, Carson S (1996) The indeterministic character of evolutionary theory: no "no hidden variables proof" but no room for determinism either. Philos Sci 63(3):315–337Google Scholar
Brandon RN, Nijhout F (2006) The empirical nonequivalence of genic and genotypic models of selection: a (decisive) refutation of genic selectionism and pluralistic genic selectionism. Philos Sci 73:277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clatterbuck H, Sober E, Lewontin RC (2013) Selection never dominates drift (nor vice versa). Biol Philos 28:577–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaconis P, Holmes S, Montgomery R (2007) Dynamical bias in the coin toss. SIAM Rev 49(2):211–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler JA (1986) Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Eyre-Walker A (2006) The genomic rate of adaptive evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 10:569–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grueber CE, Wallis GP, Jamieson IG (2013) Genetic drift outweighs natural selection at toll-like receptor (TLR) immunity loci in a re-introduced population of a threatened species. Mol Ecol 22:4470–4482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald JH, Kreitman M (1991) Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351(6328):652–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar