Has Grafen formalized Darwin?
- 472 Downloads
One key aim of Grafen’s Formal Darwinism project is to formalize ‘modern biology’s understanding and updating of Darwin’s central argument’. In this commentary, I consider whether Grafen has succeeded in this aim.
KeywordsFormal Darwinism Darwin Cumulative adaptation Apparent design
I thank Anthony Edwards, Warren Ewens, Rufus Johnstone, Tim Lewens, Samir Okasha, Cedric Paternotte and John Welch for their extensive and very helpful comments.
- Casler K, Kelemen D (2008) Developmental continuity in teleo-functional explanation: reasoning about nature in Romanian Romani adults. J Cogn Dev 9:340–362Google Scholar
- Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Dawkins R (1986) The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a world without design. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kelemen D, Carey S (2007) The essence of artifacts: developing the design stance. In: Laurence S, Margolis E (eds) Creations of the mind: theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 212–230Google Scholar
- Lewens T (2005) The problems of biological design. R Inst Philos Suppl 56:177–191Google Scholar
- Sober E (2011) Did Darwin write the Origin backwards?. Prometheus, AmherstGoogle Scholar