Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 539–557 | Cite as

Evolutionary contingency and SETI revisited

Article

Abstract

The well-known argument against the Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence (SETI) due to George Gaylord Simpson is re-analyzed almost half a century later, in the light of our improved understanding of preconditions for the emergence of life and intelligence brought about by the ongoing “astrobiological revolution”. Simpson’s argument has been enormously influential, in particular in biological circles, and it arguably fueled the most serious opposition to SETI programmes and their funding. I argue that both proponents and opponents of Simpson’s argument have occasionally mispresented its core content. Proponents often oversimplify it as just another consequence of biological contingency, thus leaving their position open to general arguments limiting the scope of contingency in evolution (such as the recent argument of Geerat Vermeij based on selection effects in the fossil record). They also tend to neglect that the argument has been presented as essentially atemporal, while referring to entities and processes that are likely to change over time; this has become even less justifiable as our astrobiological knowledge increased in recent years. Opponents have failed to see that the weaknesses in Simpson’s position could be removed by restructuring of the argument; I suggest one way of such restructuring, envisioned long ago in the fictional context by Stanislaw Lem. While no firm consensus has emerged on the validity of Simpson’s argument so far, I suggest that, contrary to the original motivation, today it is less an anti-SETI argument, and more an astrobiological research programme. In this research programme, SETI could be generalized into a platform for testing some of the deepest assumptions about evolutionary continuity and the relative role of contingency versus convergence on unprecedented spatial and temporal scales.

Keywords

Biological complexity Evolutionary theory Contingency Convergence Astrobiology Extraterrestrial intelligence 

References

  1. Annis J (1999) Placing a limit on star-fed Kardashev type III civilisations. J British Interplanet Soc 52:33–36Google Scholar
  2. Arnold LFA (2005) Transit light-curve signatures of artificial objects. Astrophys J 627:534–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basalla G (2006) Intelligent life in the universe. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckwith SVW (2008) Detecting life-bearing extrasolar planets with space telescopes. Astrophys J 684:1404–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belkora L (2002) Minding the heavens: the story of our discovery of the Milky Way. Institute of Physics Publishing, BristolCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benton MJ (2003) When life nearly died: the greatest mass extinction of all time. Thames and Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bostrom N, Ćirković MM (eds) (2008) Global catastrophic risks. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Bracewell RN (1975) The galactic club: intelligent life in outer space. W. H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradbury RJ, Ćirković MM, Dvorsky G (2011) Dysonian approach to SETI: a fruitful middle ground? J British Interplanet Soc 64:156–165Google Scholar
  10. Chela-Flores J (2003) Testing evolutionary convergence on Europa. Int J Astrobiol 2:307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chyba CF, Hand K (2005) Astrobiology: the study of the living universe. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 43:31–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ćirković MM (2012) The astrobiological landscape: philosophical foundations of the study of cosmic life. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Ćirković MM, Bradbury RJ (2006) Galactic gradients, postbiological evolution and the apparent failure of SETI. New Astron 11:628–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conway Morris S (2003) Life’s solution: inevitable humans in a lonely universe. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crowe MJ (1986) The extraterrestrial life debate 1750–1900. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies PCW (1995) Are we alone? Philosophical implications of the discovery of extraterrestrial life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies PCW (2011) Searching for a shadow biosphere on Earth as a test of the ‘cosmic imperative’. Philos Trans R Soc A 369:624–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dick SJ (1996) The biological universe: the twentieth-century extraterrestrial life debate and the limits of science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Dick SJ (2006) NASA and the search for life in the universe. Endeavor 30:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dick SJ (2012) Critical issues in the history, philosophy, and sociology of astrobiology. Astrobiology 12:906–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dyson FJ (1960) Search for artificial stellar sources of infrared radiation. Science 131:1667–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erwin DH (1993) The Great Paleozoic crisis: life and death in the permian. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Erwin DH (2006) Extinction: how life on earth nearly ended 250 million years ago. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  24. Freitas RA Jr (1985) Observable characteristics of extraterrestrial technological civilizations. J British Interplanet Soc 38:106–112Google Scholar
  25. Fry I (2000) The emergence of life on earth: a historical and scientific overview. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  26. Gale J (2009) Astrobiology of earth: the emergence, evolution, and future of life on a planet in turmoil. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Garber SJ (1999) Searching for good science: the cancellation of NASA’s SETI program. J British Interplanet Soc 52:3–12Google Scholar
  28. Gould SJ (1987) The Flamingo’s smile: reflections in natural history. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life: the burgess shale and the nature of history. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Harada K, Yoshida E, Yokoi K (2010) Motion planning for humanoid robots. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris MJ (1986) On the detectability of antimatter propulsion space-craft. Astrophys Space Sci 123:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris MJ (2002) Limits from CGRO/EGRET data on the use of antimatter as a power source by extraterrestrial civilizations. J British Interplanet Soc 55:383–393Google Scholar
  34. Heffernan WC (1978) The singularity of our inhabited world: William Whewell and A. R. Wallace in dissent. J Hist Ideas 39:81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hofman MA (1982) Encephalization in mammals in relation to the size of the cerebral cortex. Brain Behav Evol 20:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ingrosso G, Novati SC, de Paolis F, Jetzer P, Nucita AA, Zakharov AF (2009) Pixel lensing as a way to detect extrasolar planets in M31. Mon Not R Astron Soc 399:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ingrosso G, Novati SC, de Paolis F, Jetzer P, Nucita A, Zakharov A (2011) Search for exoplanets in M31 with pixel-lensing and the PA-99-N2 event revisited. Gen Relativ Gravit 43:1047–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaltenegger L, Sasselov D (2010) Detecting planetary geochemical cycles on exoplanets: atmospheric signatures and the case of SO2. Astrophys J 708:1162–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ledford H (2012) The biological Higgs. Nature 483:528–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lem S (1974, 1977) Summa Technologiae Nolit, Belgrade, in SerbianGoogle Scholar
  41. Lem S (1987) Fiasco. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  42. Lineweaver CH (2001) An estimate of the age distribution of terrestrial planets in the universe: quantifying metallicity as a selection effect. Icarus 151:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lineweaver CH, Grether D (2003) What fraction of Sun-like stars have planets? Astrophys J 598:1350–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lineweaver CH, Fenner Y, Gibson BK (2004) The Galactic Habitable Zone and the age distribution of complex life in the Milky Way. Science 303:59–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacGowan RA, Ordway FI (1966) Intelligence in the universe. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  46. Mason JW (ed) (2008) Exoplanets: detection, formation, properties, habitability. Springer Praxis, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayr E (1993) The search for intelligence. Science 259:1522–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKay CP (1996) Time for intelligence on other planets. In: Doyle (LR) Circumstellar habitable zones, proceedings of the first international conference. Travis House Publications, Menlo Park, pp 405–419Google Scholar
  49. Michaud MAG (2007) Contact with alien civilizations: our hopes and fears about encountering extraterrestrials. Copernicus Books, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morange M (2007) What history tells us X. Fifty years ago: the beginnings of exobiology. J Biosci 32:1083–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Penny A (2011) SETI: peering into the future. Astron Geophys 52:1.21–1.24Google Scholar
  52. Rospars J-P (2011) Terrestrial biological evolution and its implication for SETI. Acta Astronaut 67:1361–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Russell DA (1983) Exponential evolution: implications for extraterrestrial intelligent life. Adv Space Res 3:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Russell DA (1995) Biodiversity and time scales for the evolution of extraterrestrial intelligence. In: Seth Shostak G (ed) Progress in the search for extraterrestrial life. ASP conference series, vol 74, San Francisco, pp 143–151Google Scholar
  55. Sagan C, Walker RG (1966) The infrared detectability of Dyson civilizations. Astrophys J 144:1216–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seager S, Deming D (2010) Exoplanet atmospheres. Ann Rev Astron Astrophys 48:631–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Simpson GG (1964) The nonprevalence of humanoids. Science 143:769–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strick JE (2004) Creating a cosmic discipline: the crystallization and consolidation of exobiology, 1957–1973. J Hist Biol 37:131–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tarter J (2001) The search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 39:511–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tilgner CN, Heinrichsen I (1998) A program to search for Dyson spheres with the infrared space observatory. Acta Astronaut 42:607–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turnbull MC, Traub WA, Jucks KW, Woolf NJ, Meyer MR, Gorlova N, Skrutskie MF, Wilson JC (2006) Spectrum of a habitable world: earthshine in the near-infrared. Astrophys J 644:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ulvestad E (2002) Biosemiotic knowledge—a prerequisite for valid explorations of extraterrestrial intelligent life. Sign Syst Studies 30:283–292Google Scholar
  64. Valencia D, O’Connell RJ, Sasselov DD (2007) Inevitability of plate tectonics on super-Earths. Astrophys J 670:L45–L48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vermeij GJ (2006) Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations. PNAS 103:1804-1809Google Scholar
  66. Wallace AR (1903) Man’s place in the universe: a study of the results of scientific research in relation to the unity or plurality of worlds. Chapman & Hall Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Ward PD, Brownlee D (2000) Rare earth: why complex life is uncommon in the universe. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. Wolfe AJ (2002) Germs in space. Joshua Lederberg, exobiology, and the public imagination, 1958–1964. Isis Int Rev Devoted Hist Sci Cult Influ 93:183–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Astronomical Observatory of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Future of Humanity Institute, Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations