Skip to main content

Proximate and ultimate causes: how come? and what for?

Abstract

Proximate and ultimate causes in evolutionary biology have come to conflate two distinctions. The first is a distinction between immediate and historical causes. The second is between explanations of mechanism and adaptive function. Mayr emphasized the first distinction but many evolutionary biologists use proximate and ultimate causes to refer to the second. I recommend that ‘ultimate cause’ be abandoned as ambiguous.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Beatty J (1994) The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr. Biol Philos 9:333–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham TC, Johnson DDP (2013) The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation. Anal Kritik 27:113–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (2009) Darwin’s “strange inversion of reasoning”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10061–10065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (2013) The evolution of reasons. In: Bashour B, Muller HD (eds) Contemporary philosophical naturalism and its implications. Routledge (in press)

  • Dewsbury DA (1999) The proximate and the ultimate: past, present, and future. Behav Process 46:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickins TE, Barton RA (2013) Reciprocal causation and the proximate–ultimate distinction. Biol Philos (in press)

  • Dietrich MR (1998) Paradox and persuasion: negotiating the place of molecular evolution within evolutionary biology. J Hist Biol 31:85–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RC (1990) Causes, proximate and ultimate. Biol Philos 5:401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero-Bosagna C (2012) Finalism in Darwinian and Lamarckian evolution: lessons from epigenetics and developmental biology. Evol Biol 39:283–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig D (1992) Genomic imprinting and the theory of parent-offspring conflict. Semin Dev Biol 3:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman A (2013) The phylogeny fallacy and the ontogeny fallacy. Biol Philos (in press)

  • Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Hoppitt W, Uller T (2013) More of how and why: cause and effect in biology revisited. Biol Philos (in press)

  • Lerner D (ed) (1965) Cause and effect. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickliter R, Berry TD (1990) The phylogeny fallacy: developmental psychology’s misapplication of evolutionary theory. Dev Rev 10:348–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1501–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1965) Cause and effect in biology. In: Lerner D (ed) Cause and effect. Free Press, New York, pp 33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N (1968) On war and peace in animals and man. Science 160:1411–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt WB (2013) Causal mechanisms of evolution and the capacity for niche construction. Biol Philos (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Thomas Dickins and Samir Okasha for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Haig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haig, D. Proximate and ultimate causes: how come? and what for?. Biol Philos 28, 781–786 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9369-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9369-z

Keywords

  • Proximate cause
  • Ultimate cause
  • Efficient cause
  • Final cause
  • Intentionality
  • Adaptation
  • Natural selection