Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 461–479 | Cite as

The strategic gene

  • David Haig
Article

Abstract

Gene-selectionists define fundamental terms in non-standard ways. Genes are determinants of difference. Phenotypes are defined as a gene’s effects relative to some alternative whereas the environment is defined as all parts of the world that are shared by the alternatives being compared. Environments choose among phenotypes and thereby choose among genes. By this process, successful gene sequences become stores of information about what works in the environment. The strategic gene is defined as a set of gene tokens that combines ‘actor’ tokens responsible for an effect with ‘recipient’ tokens whose replication is thereby enhanced. This set of tokens can extend across the boundaries of individual organisms, or other levels of selection, as these are traditionally defined.

Keywords

Gene selectionism Environment Phenotype Developmental systems theory Multi-level selection Strategic gene Relatedness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Daniel Dennett, Steve Frank, Andy Gardner, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Kim Sterelny and the Fundamental Interconnectedness of All Things discussion group made helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Bacolla A, Ulrich MJ, Larson JE, Ley TJ, Wells RD (1995) An intramolecular triplex in the human γ-globin 5′-flanking region is altered by point mutations associated with hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin. J Biol Chem 270:24556–24563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstrom CT, Rosvall M (2011) The transmission sense of information. Biol Philos 26:159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouchard F, Rosenberg A (2004) Fitness, probability and the principles of natural selection. Br J Philos Sci 55:693–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd R, Richerson PJ, Henrich J (2011) The cultural niche: why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:10918–10925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennett DC (2011) Homunculi rule: reflections on Darwinian populations and natural selection by Peter Godfrey-Smith. Biol Philos 26:475–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ewens WJ (2011) What is the gene trying to do? Br J Philos Sci 62:155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher RA (1941) Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann Eugen 11:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank SA (2009) Natural selection maximizes fisher information. J Evol Biol 22:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner A, Welch JJ (2011) A formal theory of the selfish gene. J Evol Biol 24:1801–1813Google Scholar
  13. Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray R (1992) Death of the gene: developmental systems strike back. In: Griffiths P (ed) Trees of life: essays in philosophy of biology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 165–209Google Scholar
  15. Griffiths PE (1998) What is the developmentalist challenge? Philos Sci 65:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haig D (1997) The social gene. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, 4th edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 284–304Google Scholar
  17. Haig D (2003) Meditations on birthweight: Is it better to reduce the variance or increase the mean? Epidemiology 14:490–492 (erratum Epidemiology 14:632)Google Scholar
  18. Haig D (2006) The gene meme. In: Grafen A, Ridley M (eds) Richard dawkins. How a scientist changed the way we think. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 50–65Google Scholar
  19. Haig D (2007) Weismann rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation. Biol Philos 22:415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haig D (2008) Huddling: brown fat, genomic imprinting, and the warm inner glow. Curr Biol 18:R172–R174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haig D (2010) The huddler’s dilemma: a cold shoulder or a warm inner glow. In: Székely T, Moore AJ, Komdeur J (eds) Social behaviour: genes, ecology and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–109Google Scholar
  22. Haig D, Trivers R (1995) The evolution of parental imprinting: a review of hypotheses. In: Ohlsson R, Hall K, Ritzen M (eds) Genomic imprinting: causes and consequences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–28Google Scholar
  23. Lewontin RC (1974) The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. Am J Hum Genet 26:400–411Google Scholar
  24. Lewontin RC (2000) Foreword. In: Oyama S (ed) The ontogeny of information, 2nd edn. Duke University Press, Durham, pp vii–xvGoogle Scholar
  25. Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. W. H. Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Muller HJ (1934) Variation due to change in the individual gene. Am Nat 56:32–50Google Scholar
  27. Okasha S (2008) Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection—a philosophical analysis. Br J Philos Sci 59:319–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olson M (1961) The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Oyama S (2000) The ontogeny of information. Developmental systems and evolution, 2nd edn. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  30. Queller DC (2011) A gene’s eye view of Darwinian populations. Biol Philos 26:905–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandhu KS, Shi C, Sjölinder M, Zhao Z, Göndör A, Liu L et al (2009) Nonallelic transvection of multiple imprinted loci is organized by the H19 imprinting control region during germline development. Genes Dev 23:2598–2603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shea N (2007) Representation in the genome and in other inheritance systems. Biol Philos 22:313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sober E (1984) The nature of selection. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Sober E, Wilson DS (1994) A critical review of philosophical work on the units of selection problem. Philos Sci 61:534–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sterelny K, Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and death. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Sterelny K, Kitcher P (1988) The return of the gene. J Philos 85:339–361Google Scholar
  37. Sterelny K, Smith KC, Dickison M (1996) The extended replicator. Biol Philos 11:377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sturtevant AH (1915) The behavior of the chromosomes as studied through linkage. Z indukt Abstam Vererbungs 13:234–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams GC (1986) Comments on Sober’s The nature of selection. Biol Philos 1:114–122Google Scholar
  41. Wilson DS, Sober E (1994) Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behav Brain Sci 17:585–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wunner WH (2007) Rabies virus. In: Jackson AC, Wunner WH (eds) Rabies, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 23–68Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organismic and Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations