Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 321–361 | Cite as

Plant individuality: a solution to the demographer’s dilemma

  • Ellen ClarkeEmail author
Article

Abstract

The problem of plant individuality is something which has vexed botanists throughout the ages, with fashion swinging back and forth from treating plants as communities of individuals (Darwin 1800; Braun and Stone 1853; Münch 1938) to treating them as organisms in their own right, and although the latter view has dominated mainstream thought most recently (Harper 1977; Cook 1985; Ariew and Lewontin 2004), a lively debate conducted mostly in Scandinavian journals proves that the issues are far from being resolved (Tuomi and Vuorisalo 1989b; Fagerström 1992; Pan and Price 2001). In this paper I settle the matter once and for all, by showing which elements of each side are correct.

Keywords

Biological individuality Plants Modular Genet Ramet Selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Samir Okasha, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Torbjörn Fagerström, Thomas Pradeu, Henry J Folse III and two anonymous reviewers, as well as the University of Bristol, the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research.

References

  1. Abrahamson WG, Anderson SS, McCrea KD (1991) Clonal integration: nutrient sharing between sister ramets of Solidago altissima (Compositae). Am J Bot 78(11):1508–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acosta FJ, Serrano JM, Pastor C, Lopez F (1993) Significant potential levels of hierarchical phenotypic selection in a woody perennial plant, Cistus ladanifer. Oikos 68:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ally D, Ritland K, Otto SP (2008) Can clone size serve as a proxy for clone age? An exploration using microsatellite divergence in Populus tremuloides. Mol Ecol 17(22):4897–4911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amar KO, Chadwick NE, Rinkevich B (2008) Coral kin aggregations exhibit mixed allogenic reactions and enhanced fitness during early ontogeny. BMC Evol Biol 8:126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews JH (1998) Bacteria as modular organisms. Ann Rev Microbiol 52(1):105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antolin MF, Strobeck C (1985) The population genetics of somatic mutation in plants. Am Nat 126:52–62Google Scholar
  7. Ariew A, Lewontin RC (2004) The confusions of fitness. Br J Philos Sci 55(2):347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aspi J et al (2003) Multilevel phenotypic selection on morphological characters in a metapopulation of Silene tatarica. Evolution 57(3):509–517Google Scholar
  9. Beck JB, Windham MD, Pryer KM (2011) Do asexual polyploid lineages lead short evolutionary lives? A case study from the fern genus Astrolepis. Evolution 65:3217–3229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (2006) Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandon R (1999) The units of selection revisited: the modules of selection. Biol Philos 14(2):167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brasier C (1992) A champion thallus. Nature 356(6368):382–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Braun A, Stone CF (1853) The vegetable individual, in its relation to species. Am J Sci Arts 19:297–317Google Scholar
  14. Breese EL, Hayward MD, Thomas AC (1965) Somatic selection in rye grass. Heredity 20:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burnet FM (1969) Self and not-self. Cellular Immunology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Buss LW (1983) Evolution, development, and the units of selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 80(5):1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  18. Campbell NA, Reece JB (2008) Biology, 8th edn. Benjamin Cumming’s Publishing Company, Redwood CityGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarke E (2010) The problem of biological individuality. Biol Theory 5(4):312–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clarke E (2011) Plant individuality and multilevel selection theory. In: Sterelny K, Calcott B (eds) The major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 227–251Google Scholar
  21. Cloutier D, Rioux D, Beaulieu J, Schon DJ (2003) Somatic stability of microsatellite loci in Eastern white pine, Pinus strobus L. Heredity 90:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cook RE (1979) Asexual reproduction: a further consideration. Am Nat 113(5):769–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cook RE (1980) The biology of seeds in the soil. Demography and evolution in plant populations. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  24. Cook RE (1985) Growth and development in clonal plant populations. In: Jackson JBC, Buss LW, Cook RE (eds) Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 259–296Google Scholar
  25. Darwin E (1800) Phytologia. J. Johnson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Dupré J (1995) The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Eriksson O, Jerling L (1990) Hierarchical selection and risk spreading in clonal plants. In: van Groenendael J, de Kroon H (eds) Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 79–94Google Scholar
  29. Eyles A et al (2010) Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees. New Phytol 185(4):893–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fagerström T (1992) The meristem–meristem cycle as a basis for defining fitness in clonal plants. Oikos 63(3):449–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fagerström T, Briscoe DA, Sunnucks P (1998) Evolution of mitotic cell-lineages in multicellular organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 13(3):117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Folse HJ III, Roughgarden J (2010) What is an individual organism? A multilevel selection perspective. Q Rev Biol. 85(4):447–472.Google Scholar
  33. Folse HJ III, Roughgarden J (2011) Direct benefits of genetic mosaicism and intraorganismal selection: modelling coevolution between a long-lived tree and a short-lived herbivore. Evolution. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01500.x
  34. Frank SA (1997) Models of symbiosis. Am Nat 150(S1):80–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gardner A, Grafen A (2009) Capturing the superorganism, a formal theory of group adaptation. J Evol Biol 22:659–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gill DE, Chao l, Perkins SL, Wolf JB (1995) Genetic mosaicism in plants and clonal animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26(1):423–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Gorelick R, Heng HHQ (2011) Sex reduces genetic variation: a multidisciplinary review. Evolution 65(4):1088–1098Google Scholar
  39. Gould SJ (1991) The flamingo’s smile: reflections in natural history. Penguin books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Hadany L (2000) A conflict between two evolutionary levels in trees. J Theor Biol 208(4):507–521Google Scholar
  41. Hadany L (2001) A conflict between two evolutionary levels in trees. J Theor Biol 208(4):507–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hamilton NR, Schmid B, Harper JL (1987) Life-history concepts and the population biology of clonal organisms. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 232(1266):35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hardwick RC (1986) Physiological consequences of modular growth in plants. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 313:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Harper JL et al (1979) Population dynamics. The population dynamics of growth form in organisms with modular construction, pp 29–52Google Scholar
  46. Harper JL (1985) Modules, branches, and the capture of resources. In: Jackson JB, Buss LW, Cook RE (eds) Population biology and evolution of clonal animals. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  47. Hastings IM (1991) Germline selection: population genetics of the sexual/asexual lifecycle. Genetics 129:1167–1176Google Scholar
  48. Hellström K, Kytoviita MM, Tuomi J, Rautio P (2006) Plasticity of clonal integration in the perennial herb Linaria vulgaris after damage. Funct Ecol 20:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hughes RN (1989) A functional biology of clonal animals. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Hull DL (1978) A matter of individuality. Philos Sci 45(3):335–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hull DL (1980) Individuality and selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11(1):311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hutchings MJ, Booth D (2004) Much ado about nothing… so far? J Evol Biol 17(6):1184–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Huxley TH (1852) Upon animal individuality. Proc R Inst 1:184–189Google Scholar
  54. Huxley JS (1912) The individual in the animal kingdom. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Jablonka E, Raz G (2009) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 84:131–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jackson JBC, Coates AG (1986) Life cycles and evolution of clonal (modular) animals. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond B Biol Sci 313(1159):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jackson JB, Buss LW, Cook RE (1985) Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  59. Janzen DH (1977) What are dandelions and aphids? Am Nat 111:586–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jelinkova H, Tremblay F, DesRochers A (2009) Molecular and dendrochronological analysis of natural root grafting in Populus tremuloides (Salicaceae). Am J Bot 96(8):1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jerling L (1985) Are plants and animals alike? A note on evolutionary plant population ecology. Oikos 45(1):150–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Johnson MTJ, Fitzjohn RG, Smith SD, Rausher MD, Otto SP (2011) Loss of sexual recombination and segregation is associated with increased diversification in evening primroses. Evolution 65:3230–3240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444(7117):323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kerr B, Godfrey-Smith P (2002) Individualist and multi-level perspectives on selection in structured populations. Biol Philos 17(4):477–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Klekowski EJ (2003) Plant clonality, mutation, diplontic selection and mutational meltdown. Biol J Linn Soc 79(1):61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Klekowski EJ, Kazarinova-Fukshansky N (1984) Shoot apical meristems and mutation: fixation of selectively neutral cell genotypes. Am J Bot 71(1):22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Klekowski EJ, Kazarinova-Fukshansky N, Mohr H (1985) Shoot apical meristems and mutation: stratified meristems and angiosperm evolution. Am J Bot 72:1788–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Leigh EG (2010) The group selection controversy. J Evol Biol 23:6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lloyd E (2005) Units and levels of selection. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Published on 22 Aug 2005. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/selection-units/#3.1
  71. Loeb L (1921) Transplantation and individuality. Biol Bull 40(3):143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Loeb L (1937) The biological basis of individuality. Science 86:1–5Google Scholar
  73. Lovett Doust L, Lovett Doust J (1982) The battle strategies of plants. New Sci 95:81–84Google Scholar
  74. Loxdale HD (2008) The nature and reality of the aphid clone: genetic variation, adaptation and evolution. Agr For Entomol 10:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lushai G, Loxdale HD, Allen JA (2003) The dynamic clonal genome and its adaptive potential. Biol J Linn Soc 79:193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lyndon RF (1990) Plant development. Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Marcotrigiano M (2000) Herbivory could unlock mutations sequestered in stratified shoot apices of genetic mosaics. Am J Bot 87(3):355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Martens J (2010) Organisms in evolution. Hist Philos Life Sci 32:373–400Google Scholar
  79. Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Mayr E (1996) What is a species, and what is not? Phil Sci 63(2):262–277Google Scholar
  81. Medawar PB (1957) The uniqueness of the individual. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. Metchnikoff E (1905) Immunity in infectious diseases (Trans. from the French by FG Binnie). CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  83. Michod RE (1999) Darwinian dynamics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  84. Michod RE, Herron MD (2006) Cooperation and conflict during evolutionary transitions in individuality. J Evol Biol 19(5):1406–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Michod RE, Nedelcu AM (2003) On the reorganization of fitness during evolutionary transitions in individuality. Integr Comp Biol 43(1):64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Monro K, Poore AGB (2004) Selection in modular organisms: is intraclonal variation in macroalgae evolutionarily important? Am Nat 163(4):564–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Monro K, Poore AGB (2009) The potential for evolutionary responses to cell-lineage selection on growth form and its plasticity in a Red Seaweed. Am Nat 173(2):151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Münch E (1938) Untersuchungen uiber die Harmonie der Baumgestalt. Jahrb Wiss Bot 86:581–673Google Scholar
  89. Murchison EP (2008) Clonally transmissible cancers in dogs and Tasmanian devils. Oncogene 27:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nasrallah JB (2005) Recognition and rejection of self in plant self-incompatibility: comparisons to animal histocompatibility. Trends Immunol 26(8):412–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Neiman M, Linksvayer TA (2006) The conversion of variance and the evolutionary potential of restricted recombination. Heredity 96:111–121Google Scholar
  92. Niklas KJ (1997) The evolutionary biology of plants. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  93. Oborny B et al (2000) The effect of clonal integration on plant competition for mosaic habitat space. Ecology 81(12):3291–3304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Monographs in Population Biology 37, Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  95. Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Orive ME (2001) Somatic mutations in organisms with complex life histories. Theor Popul Biol 59(3):235–249Google Scholar
  97. Otto SP, Hastings IM (1998) Cell lineage selection, germinal mosaics, and evolution-mutation and selection within the individual. Genetica-Den Haag 102:507–524Google Scholar
  98. Otto SP, Orive ME (1995) Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual. Genetics 141:1173–1187Google Scholar
  99. Pan JP, Price JS (2001) Fitness and evolution in clonal plants: the impact of clonal growth. Evol Ecol 15(4–6):583–600Google Scholar
  100. Pan JJ, Price JS (2002) Fitness and evolution in clonal plants: the impact of clonal growth. Evol Ecol 15(4):583–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Peakall R et al (2003) Comparative genetic study confirms exceptionally low genetic variation in the ancient and endangered relictual conifer, Wollemia nobilis (Araucariaceae). Mol Ecol 12(9):2331–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pedersen B, Tuomi J (1995) Hierarchical selection and fitness in modular and clonal organisms. Oikos 73(2):167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pepper JW, Herron MD (2008) Does biology need an organism concept? Biol Rev 83(4):621–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pineda-Krch F, Fagerström T (1999) On the potential for evolutionary change in meristematic cell lineages through intraorganismal selection. J Evol Biol 12(4):681–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pineda-Krch M, Lehtilä K (2002) Cell lineage dynamics in stratified shoot apical meristems. J Theor Biol 219(4):495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pineda-Krch M, Lehtilä K (2004) Costs and benefits of genetic heterogeneity within organisms. J Evol Biol 17(6):1167–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Pitelka LF, Ashmun JW (1985) Physiology and integration of ramets in clonal plants. In: Population biology and evolution of clonal animals. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  108. Poore AGB, Fagerström T (2001) A general model for selection among modules in haplo-diploid life histories. Oikos 92(2):256–264Google Scholar
  109. Pradeu T (2010) What is an organism? An immunological answer. Hist Philos Life Sci 32:247–268Google Scholar
  110. Pradeu T, Carosella ED (2006) On the definition of a criterion of immunogenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(47):17858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Queller DC, Strassmann JE (2009) Beyond society: the evolution of organismality. Philos Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci 364:3143–3155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rival A, Beulé T, Aberlenc-Bertossi F, Tregear J, Jaligot E (2010) Plant epigenetics: from genomes to epigenomes. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj 38(9–15):2010Google Scholar
  114. Robbins WJ (1964) Topophysis, a problem in somatic inheritance. Proc Am Philos Soc 108:395–403Google Scholar
  115. Salzman AG (1985) Habitat selection in a clonal plant. Science 228(4699):603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Silvertown JW (2005) Demons in Eden: the paradox of plant diversity. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  117. Silvertown JW, Charlesworth D (2001) Introduction to plant population biology. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  118. Simpson EH (1951) The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 13(2):238–241Google Scholar
  119. Sober E, Wilson DS (1999) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  120. Solbrig OT (1980) Demography and evolution in plant populations. Botanical monographs, vol 15. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  121. Sterelny K, Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  122. Stevens L, Goodnight CJ, Kalisz S (1995) Multilevel selection in natural populations of impatiens capensis. Am Nat 145(4):513–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Stewart FC, Mapes MO, Smith J (1958) Growth and organized development of cultured cells. I. Growth and division of freely suspended cells. Am J Bot 45(9):693–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sutherland WJ, Watkinson AR (1986) Somatic mutation: do plants evolve differently? Nature 320:305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tarroux E, DeRochers A (2011) Effect of natural root grafting on growth response of jack pine (Pinus banksiana; Pinaceae). Am J Bot 98(6):967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tauber AI (2009) The biological notion of self and non-self. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/biology-self/
  127. Townsend CR, Begon M, Harper JL (2003) Essentials of ecology. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  128. Tuomi J, Vuorisalo T (1989a) Hierarchical selection in modular organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 4(7):209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Tuomi J, Vuorisalo T (1989b) What are the units of selection in modular organisms? Oikos 54(2):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Vallad GE, Goodman RM (2004) Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Sci 44(6):1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. van Oppen MJH, Souter M, Howells EJ, Heyward A, Berkelmans R (2011) Novel genetic diversity through somatic mutations: fuel for adaptation of reef corals? Diversity 2011(3):405–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Van Valen L (1978) Arborescent animals and other colonoids. Nature 276:318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Van Valen L (1989) Three paradigms of evolution. Evol Theory 9:1–17Google Scholar
  134. Verdeil J et al (2007) Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends Plant Sci 12(6):245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Watkinson AR, White J (1986) Some life-history consequences of modular construction in plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 313(1159):31–51Google Scholar
  136. Weeks AR, Hoffman AA (1998) Intense selection of mite clones in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 52:1325–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Weinig C et al (2007) Antagonistic multilevel selection on size and architecture in variable density settings. Evolution 61(1):58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Weismann A (1885) The continuity of the germ-plasm as the foundation of a theory of heredity. Essays upon heredity and kindred biological problems. pp 161–254Google Scholar
  139. White J (1979) The plant as a metapopulation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10(1):109–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Whitham TG, Slobodchikoff CN (1981) Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: the adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia 49(3):287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Whittle CA (2006) The influence of environmental factors, the pollen: ovule ratio and seed bank persistence on molecular evolutionary rates in plants. J Evol Biol 19:302–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wikberg S (1995) Fitness in clonal plants. Oikos 72(2):293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Williams GG (1986) Retrospect on modular organisms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 313(1159):245–250Google Scholar
  144. Wilson J (1999) Biological individuality: The identity and persistence of living entities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wilson RA (2007) The biological notion of individual. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2007 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2007/entries/biology-individual/
  146. Wilson ACC, Sunnucks P, Hales DF (2003) Heritable genetic variation and potential for adaptive evolution in asexual aphids (Aphidoidea). Biol J Linn Soc 79:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Winkler E, Fischer M (1999) Two fitness measures for clonal plants and the importance of spatial aspects. Plant Ecol 141(1):191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.All Souls CollegeOxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations