This paper distinguishes between causal isolation robustness analysis and independent determination robustness analysis and suggests that the triangulation of the results of different epistemic means or activities serves different functions in them. Circadian clock research is presented as a case of causal isolation robustness analysis: in this field researchers made use of the notion of robustness to isolate the assumed mechanism behind the circadian rhythm. However, in contrast to the earlier philosophical case studies on causal isolation robustness analysis (Weisberg and Reisman in Philos Sci 75:106–131, 2008; Kuorikoski et al. in Br J Philos Sci 61:541–567, 2010), robustness analysis in the circadian clock research did not remain in the level of mathematical modeling, but it combined it with experimentation on model organisms and a new type of model, a synthetic model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
This strategy usually presumes that the phenomenon under study is robust itself, which creates a link between the epistemic uses of the notion of robustness and the causal robustness of the real phenomena (for this distinction, see Woodward 2006).
Woodward in fact also criticizes this view, see also Stegenga (2009).
So far, there has not been much overlap between the philosophical literatures on experimentation and robustness analysis.
Circadian clock research has been used recently by Bechtel and Abrahamsen (2010, 2011) as an exemplary case of mechanistic research that has successfully combined the decompositional approach of finding the basic components of mechanisms to the study of their interactions by modeling. On our account this “recomposition” taking place between experimental results and modeling was far from seamless and synthetic models were partly designed to fill the gap between these two activities (cf. Loettgers 2007).
Alon U, Surette M, Barkai N, Leibler S (1999) Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397(6715):168–171
Barkai N, Leibler S (2000) Circadian clocks limited by noise. Nature 403(20):267–268
Bechtel W, Abrahamsen A (2010) Dynamic mechanistic explanation: computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an examplar for cognitive science. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 41:321–333
Bechtel W, Abrahamsen A (2011) Complex biological mechanisms: Cyclic, oscillatory, and autonomous. In: Hooker CA (ed) Philosophy of complex systems. Handbook of the philosophy of science, vol 10. Elsevier,Oxford, pp 257–285
Calcott B (2011) Wimsatt and the robustness family: Review of Wimsatt’s Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Biol Philos 26:281–293
Cartwright N (1989) Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Cartwright N (1999) The vanity of rigour in economics: theoretical models and Galilean experiments. Centre for philosophy of natural and social science. Discussion paper series 43/99. (Published also in Fontaine P, Leonard R (eds) The Experiment in the History of Economics. Routledge, 2005)
Elowitz M, Leibler S (2000) A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional translation. Nature 403(6767):335–338
Goldbeter A (1995) A model of circadian Oscillations in the Drosophila period protein (PER). In Proceedings of the R Soc B 261:319–324
Goldbeter A (1996) Biochemical Oscillations and cellular rhythms: the molecular bases of periodic and chaotic behavior. Cambridge University Press, New York
Goodwin B (1963) Temporal organization in cells. Academic Press, London and New York
Hardin PE, Hall JC, Rosbash M (1990) Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels. Nature 343:536–540
Humphreys P (2002) Computational models. Philos Sci 69:1–11
Humphreys P (2004) Extending ourselves: computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jacob F, Monod J (1961) Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol 3:318–356
Kerner E (1957) A statistical mechanics of interacting biological species. Bul of Math Biophys 19:121–146
Kitano H (2004) Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet 5:826–837
Knuuttila T (2009) Isolating representations versus credible constructions? Economic modeling in theory and practice. Erkenntnis 70:59–80
Knuuttila T, Loettgers A (in press) The productive tension: mechanisms vs. templates in modeling the phenomena. In: Humphreys P, Imbert C (eds) Representations, models, and simulations. Routledge, London
Konopka RJ, Benzer S (1971) Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci 68(9):2112–2116
Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Political Econ 99(3):483–499
Kuorikoski J, Lehtinen A, Marchionni C (2010) Economic modeling as robustness analysis. Br J Philos Sci 61:541–567
Levins R (1966) The strategy of model building in population biology. Am Sci 54:421–431
Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments; some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Levins R (1993) A response to Orzack and Sober: formal analysis and the fluidity of science. Q Rev Biol 68:547–555
Loettgers A (2007) Model organisms, mathematical models, and synthetic models in exploring gene regulatory mechanisms. Biol Theor 2:134–142
Mäki U (1992) On the method of isolation in economics. Poznan Stud Philos Sci Humanities 26:319–354
Mäki U (2005) Models are experiments, experiments are models. J Econ Meth 12:303–315
Mäki U (2009) MISSing the world. Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis 70:29–43
Mäki U (2011) Models and the locus of their truth. Synthese 180:47–63
Mill JS (1843) A system of logic. Longman, Green, & co, London
Mitchell SD (2008) Exporting causal knowledge in evolutionary and developmental biology. Philos Sci 75:697–706
Morrison M (2008) Fictions, representations, and reality. In: Suárez M (ed) Fictions in science: philosophical essays on modeling and idealization. Routledge, New York & London, pp 110–135
Orzack SH, Sober E (1993) A Critical assessment of Levins’s The strategy of model building in population biology (1966). Q Rev Biol 68:533–546
Parker W (2009) Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments and materiality. Synthesis 169(3):483–496
Stegenga J (2009) Robustness, discordance, and relevance. Philos Sci 76:650–661
Stelling J, Sauer U, Szallasi Z, Doyle FJ III, Doyle J (2004) Robustness of cellular functions. Cell 118:675–685
Strevens M (2008) Depth: an account of scientific explanation. Harvard University Press, Harvard
Strogatz S (1994) Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Perseus Pub, Cambridge, MA
Sugden R (2000) Credible worlds: the status of theoretical models in economics. J Econ Meth 7(1):169–201
Taguchi G, Chowdhury S, Taguchi S (2000) Robust engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York
Volterra V (1927) Variations and fluctuations in the numbers of coexisting animal species. In: Scudo FM, Ziegler JR (eds) 1978, The golden age of theoretical ecology: 1923–1940. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–236
Wagner A (2007) Robustness & evolvability in living systems (Princeton Studies in Complexity). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Weisberg M (2006a) Forty years of “The strategy”: Levins on model building and idealization. Biol Philos 21:623–645
Weisberg M (2006b) Robustness analysis. Philos Sci 73:730–742
Weisberg, M (2007) Three kinds of idealization. J Philos CIV(12):639–659
Weisberg M, Reisman K (2008) The robust Volterra principle. Philos Sci 75:106–131
Whittaker E (1941) Vito Volterra. Obit Notices Fellows Royal Soc London 3:691–729
Wimsatt WC (1981) Robustness, reliability, and overdetermination. In: Brewer MB, Collins B (eds) Scientific inquiry and the social sciences–A volume in honor of Donald T. Campbell. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 124–163
Wimsatt WC (2007) Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: approximations to reality. Harvard Univ, Press, Cambridge
Winfree AT (1967) Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled Oscillators. J Theoret Biol 16:15–42
Woodward J (2006) Some varieties of robustness. J Econ Meth 13:219–240
The authors would like to thank the Academy of Finland and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for the support of this research.
About this article
Cite this article
Knuuttila, T., Loettgers, A. Causal isolation robustness analysis: the combinatorial strategy of circadian clock research. Biol Philos 26, 773–791 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9279-x
- Robustness analysis
- Causal isolation
- Synthetic biology
- Circadian clock