Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 299–312 | Cite as

Groups, individuals, and evolutionary restraints: the making of the contemporary debate over group selection

Review Essay


  1. Alcock J (1979) Animal behavior: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrewartha H, Birch C (1954) The distribution of and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Beshers SM, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440Google Scholar
  4. Bijma P, Wade MJ (2008) The joint effects of Kin, multi-level selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection. J Evol Biol 21:1175–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borrello M (2005) The rise, fall and resurrection of group selection. Endeavour 29(1):43–47Google Scholar
  6. Borrello M (2010) Evolutionary restraints: the contentious history of group selection. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouchard F (2009) Understanding colonial traits using symbiosis research and ecosystem ecology. Biol Theory 4(3):240–246Google Scholar
  8. Chapman RN (1928) The quantitative analysis of environmental factors. Ecology 9:111–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson J, Andrewartha H (1948) Annual trends in a natural population of Thrips Imaginis (Thsanoptera). J Anim Ecol 17:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawkins R (1982) Replicators and vehicles. In: King’s College Sociobiology Group (ed) Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–64Google Scholar
  11. DeHeer CJ, Ross KG (1997) Lack of detectable nepotism in multiple-queen colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dugatkin LA (2006) The altruism equation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  13. Elton C (1963) Self-regulation of animal populations. Nature 197:634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghiselin MT (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Syst Zool 23:536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodnight CJ, Stevens L (1997) Experimental studies of group selection: what do they tell us about group selection in nature? Am Nat 150:S59–S79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griesemer JR (2000) The units of evolutionary transition. Selection 1:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior, I and II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton WD (1975) Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. In: Fox R (ed) Biosocial anthropology. Malaby Press, London, pp 133–153Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton WD (1996a) Narrow roads of gene land: The collected papers of W. D. Hamilton, vol 1. Evolution of social behavior. W.H. Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton WD (1996b) Narrow roads of gene land: the collected papers of W. D. Hamilton, vol 2. Evolution of sex. W.H. Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton A, Smith NR, Haber MH (2009) Social insects and the individuality. Thesis: cohesion and the colony as a selectable individual. In: Gadau J, Fewell J (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 570–596Google Scholar
  22. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. W.W. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hull DL (1976) Are species really individuals? Syst Zool 25:174–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hull DL (1980) Individuality and selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hull DL (1981) The units of evolution: a metaphysical essay. In: Jensen UJ, Harre R (eds) In studies in the concept of evolution. The Harvester Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Keim B (2007) A brief history of the superorganism. Wired Sci. Retrieved from<->brief-history.html
  27. Lack, D (1947–1948) The significance of clutch-size. Ibis 89:302–352; 90:25–45Google Scholar
  28. Lack D (1952) Reproductive rate and population density in the Great Tit: Kluijver’s study. Ibis 94:166–173Google Scholar
  29. Lack D (1954a) The evolution of reproductive rates. In: Huxley JS, Hardy AC, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 143–156Google Scholar
  30. Lack D (1954b) The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Lack D (1966) Population studies of birds. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. MacLagan DS (1932) The effect of population density upon rate of reproduction with special reference to insects. Proc R Soc B 111:437–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martens J (2010) Organisms in evolution. Hist Philos Life Sci 32:373–400Google Scholar
  34. Maynard Smith J (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201:1145–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maynard Smith J (1976) Group selection. Q Rev Biol 61:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maynard Smith J (1988) Evolutionary progress and the nature of selection. In: Nitecki MH (ed) Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 219–230Google Scholar
  37. Maynard Smith J (2002) Commentary on Kerr and Godfrey-Smith. Biol Philos 17(4):523–527Google Scholar
  38. Nicholson AJ (1933) Supplement: the balance of animal populations. J Anim Ecol 2:131–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Okasha S (2005) Maynard Smith on the levels of selection question. Biol Philos 20:989–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pearl R (1932) The influence of density of population upon egg production in Drosophila Melanogaster. J Exp Zool 63:57–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reeve HK, Hoelldobler B (2007) The emergence of a superorganism through intergroup competition. PNAS 104(23):9736–9740Google Scholar
  43. Shavit A (2005) The notion of ‘group’ and tests of group selection. Philos Sci 72:1052–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith HS (1935) The role of biotic factors in the determination of population densities. J Econ Entomol 28:873–898Google Scholar
  45. Smith R (1996) Ecology and field biology, 5th edn. Addison Wesley, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  46. Wheeler WM (1911) The ant-colony as an organism. J Morphol 22:307–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wheeler WM (1928) Emergent evolution and the development of societies. Newton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams GC (1996) Adaptation and evolution: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson DS (1975) A theory of group selection. Proc Nat Acad Sci 72:143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wimsatt WC (1980) Reductionist research strategies and their biases in the units of selection controversy. In: Nickles T (ed) Scientific discovery: case studies. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 213–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wimsatt WC (1981) Units of selection and the structure of the multi-level genome. Proc Philos Sci Assoc 2:122–183Google Scholar
  52. Wimsatt WC, Griesemer JR (2007) Reproducing entrenchments to Scaffold culture: the central role of development in cultural evolution. In: Sansom R, Brandon R (eds) Integrating evolution and development: from theory to practice. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp 228–323Google Scholar
  53. Wright R (2001) Robert Wright interviews John Maynard Smith. Video and transcript at
  54. Wynne-Edwards VC (1962) Animal dispersion in relation to social behavior. Oliver and Boyd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  55. Wynne-Edwards VC (1964) Group selection and kin selection: response to Maynard-Smith. Nature 201:1145–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wynne-Edwards VC (1985) Backstage and upstage with animal dispersion. In: Dewsbury D (ed) Leaders in the study of animal behavior: autobiographical perspectives. Bucknell University Press, Lewisburg, pp 486–512Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Biology and Society, School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations