Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 251–260 | Cite as

Sober & Wilson’s evolutionary arguments for psychological altruism: a reassessment



In their book Unto Others, Sober and Wilson argue that various evolutionary considerations (based on the logic of natural selection) lend support to the truth of psychological altruism. However, recently, Stephen Stich has raised a number of challenges to their reasoning: in particular, he claims that three out of the four evolutionary arguments they give are internally unconvincing, and that the one that is initially plausible fails to take into account recent findings from cognitive science and thus leaves open a number of egoistic responses. These challenges make it necessary to reassess the plausibility of Sober & Wilson’s evolutionary account—which is what I aim to do in this paper. In particular, I try to show that, as a matter of fact, Sober & Wilson’s case remains compelling, as some of Stich’s concerns rest on a confusion, and those that do not are not sufficiently strong to establish all the conclusions he is after. The upshot is that no reason has been given to abandon the view that evolutionary theory has advanced the debate surrounding psychological altruism.


Altruism Evolution Adaptive Evidence Sub-doxastic Unto Others 


  1. Batson CD (1991) The altruism question: towards a social-psychological answer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  2. Carey S (1998) Knowledge of number: its evolution and ontogenesis. Science 242:641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldman A (1970) A theory of human action. Prentice-Hall, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Lemos J (2004) Psychological hedonism, evolutionary biology, and the experience machine. Philos Soc Sci 34:506–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Orzack S, Sober E (1994) Optimality models and the test of adaptationism. Am Nat 143:361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pylyshyn Z (1999) Is vision continuous with cognition? Behav Brain Sci 22:341–423Google Scholar
  7. Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Stich S (1978) Beliefs and sub-doxastic states. Philos Sci 45:499–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stich S (2007) Evolution, altruism and cognitive architecture: a critique of Sober and Wilson’s Argument for psychological altruism. Biol Philos 22:267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stich S, Doris J, Roedder E (forthcoming) The science of altruism. In: Doris JM, Harman G, Nichols S, Prinz J, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Stich S (eds) The Oxford handbook of moral psychology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations