Skip to main content

Is there a general theory of community ecology?

Biology & Philosophy volume 24, pages 521–529 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Community ecology entered the 1970s with the belief that niche theory would supply a general theory of community structure. The lack of wide-spread empirical support for niche theory led to a focus on models specific to classes of communities such as lakes, intertidal communities, and forests. Today, the needs of conservation biology for metrics of “ecological health” that can be applied across types of communities prompts a renewed interest in the possibility of general theory for community ecology. Disputes about the existence of general patterns in community structure trace at least to the 1920s and continue today almost unchanged in concept, although now expressed through mathematical modeling. Yet, a new framework emerged in the 1980s from findings that community composition and structure depend as much on the processes that bring species to the boundaries of a community as by processes internal to a community, such as species interactions and co-evolution. This perspective, termed “supply-side ecology”, argued that community ecology was to be viewed as an “organic earth science” more than as a biological science. The absence of a general theory of the earth would then imply a corresponding absence of any general theory for the communities on the earth, and imply that the logical structure of theoretical community ecology would consist of an atlas of models special to place and geologic time. Nonetheless, a general theory of community ecology is possible similar in form to the general theory for evolution if the processes that bring species to the boundary of a community are analogized to mutation, and the processes that act on the species that arrive at a community are analogized to selection. All communities then share some version of this common narrative, permitting general theorems to be developed pertaining to all ecological communities. Still, the desirability of a general theory of community ecology is debatable because the existence of a general theory suppresses diversity of thought even as it allows generalizations to be derived. The pros and cons of a general theory need further discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Board of Life Sciences (2008) The Role of Theory in Advancing twenty-first Century Biology: Catalyzing Transformative Research. (Report of the Committee on Defining and Advancing the Conceptual Basis of Biological Sciences in the twenty-first Century.) National Research Council of the National Academies, The National Academies Press, pp 208

  • Brown J (1975) Geographical ecology of desert rodents. In: Cody M, Diamond J (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 315–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789. doi:10.1890/03-9000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Kitchell J, Hodgson J (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience 35:634–639. doi:10.2307/1309989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE (1916) Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol 24:252–284. doi:10.2307/2256278

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1978) Food webs and niche space. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly S, Menge BA, Roughgarden J (2001) A latitudinal gradient in recruitment of intertidal invertebrates in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Ecology 82:1799–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (1973) Distributional ecology of New Guinea birds. Science 179:759–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaines S, Roughgarden J (1985) Larval settlement rate: a leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3707–3711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:1–20. doi:10.2307/2479932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harte J, Kinzig A, Green J (1999) Self-similarity in the abundance and distribution of species. Science 284:334–336. doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell S (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159. doi:10.1086/282070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1984) Geographical ecology, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Connell JH (1967) The biology of populations. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101:377–385. doi:10.1086/282505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1963) An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evol Int J Org Evol 17:373–387. doi:10.2307/2407089

    Google Scholar 

  • May R (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum E (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270. doi:10.1126/science.164.3877.262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacala S, Roughgarden J (1985) Population experiments with the Anolis lizards of St. Maarten and St. Eustatius. Ecology 66:128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacala S, Silander J (1985) Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. I. Single-species models of annuals. Am Nat 125:385–411. doi:10.1086/284349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston F (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43(185–215):410–432. doi:10.2307/1931976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld L, Anderson T, Hatcher G,et al. (1995) Upwelling fronts and barnacle recruitment in central California. Technical Report 95–19, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA

  • Roughgarden J (1972) Evolution of niche width. Amer Natur 106:683–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (1976) Resource partitioning among competing species: a coevolutionary approach. Theor Popul Biol 9:388–424. doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90054-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (1990) Origin of the Eastern Caribbean: Data from reptiles and amphibians. In: Larue DK and Draper G (eds) Trans. 12th Caribbean Geological Conference, St. Croix, USVI, Miami Geological Survey, pp 10–26

  • Roughgarden J (1995) Anolis Lizards of the Caribbean: ecology, evolution, and plate tectonics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 200

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (1998) Production functions from ecological populations: a survey with emphasis on spatially explicit models. In: Tilman D, Kareiva P (eds) Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 296–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (2007) Challenging Darwin’s theory of sexual selection. Daedalus 136(2):1–14. doi:10.1162/daed.2007.136.2.23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (2009) The genial gene: deconstructing Darwinian selfishness. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Iwasa Y (1986) Dynamics of a metapopulation with space-limited subpopulations. Theor Popul Biol 29:235–261. doi:10.1016/0040-5809(86)90010-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Iwasa Y, Baxter C (1985) Demographic theory for an open marine population with space-limited recruitment. Ecology 66:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Gaines S, Pacala S (1987) Supply side ecology: The role of physical transport processes. In: Gee JHR and Giller PS (eds) Organization of Communities, Past and Present, The 27th Symposium of the the British Ecological Society, Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp 491–518

  • Roughgarden J, Gaines S, Possingham H (1988) Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. Science 241:1460–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Pennington J, Stoner D, Alexander S, Miller K (1991) Collisions of upwelling fronts with the intertidal zone: the cause of recruitment pulses in barnacle populations of central California. Acta Oecologica 12:35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T (1982) The controversy over interspecific competition. Amer Sci 70:586–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T (1984) Strong. In: Simberloff DRD, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 254–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkedy Y, Roughgarden J (1997) Barnacle recruitment and population dynamics predicted from coastal upwelling. Oikos 80(3):487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2004) Community ecology: is it time to move on? Am Nat 163:787–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale S (1976) On the differential equations of species in competition. J Math Biol 3:5–7. doi:10.1007/BF00307854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (2001) Law and explanation in biology: invariance is the kind of stability that matters. Philos Sci 68:1–20. doi:10.1086/392863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (2002) There is no such thing as a ceteris paribus law. Erkenntnis 57:303–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (2003) Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Joan Roughgarden

Authors
  1. Joan Roughgarden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Roughgarden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roughgarden, J. Is there a general theory of community ecology?. Biol Philos 24, 521–529 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-009-9164-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-009-9164-z

Keywords

  • Community ecology
  • Theoretical ecology
  • Supply-side ecology
  • Earth-systems science
  • Organic earth science
  • Conservation
  • Ecological health
  • Philosophy of biology
  • Philosophy of ecology
  • Philosophy of science
  • General theory