Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 529–544 | Cite as

But is it progress? On the alleged advances of conservation biology over ecology

Article

Abstract

As conservation biology has developed as a distinct discipline from ecology, conservation guidelines based on ecological theory have been largely cast aside in favor of theory-independent decision procedures for designing conservation reserves. I argue that this transition has failed to advance the field toward its aim of preserving biodiversity. The abandonment of island biogeography theory in favor of complementarity-based algorithms is a case in point. In what follows, I consider the four central objections raised against island biogeographic conservation guidelines, arguing that they fail to undermine the credibility of this framework as a conservation tool. At best, these objections call for a more careful application of this framework to conservation problems, not its wholesale abandonment. At the same time, complementarily-based algorithms are biased in favor of networks of small reserves containing non-overlapping species. These conditions threaten to promote inbreeding depression, genetic drift and other factors that increase a population’s risk of extinction. Therefore, recent developments in the field of conservation biology have arguably not contributed to its ultimate aim of preserving the maximum amount of biodiversity in the long run.

Keywords

Biodiversity Complementarity Conservation biology Ecology Island biogeography theory Philosophy of ecology 

References

  1. Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63:215–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooper G (2003) The science for the struggle for existence: on the foundations of ecology. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Diamond JM (1971) Comparison of faunal equilibrium turnover rates on a tropical island and a temperate island. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:2742–2745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diamond JM (1984) Distributions of New Zealand birds on real and virtual Islands. N Z J Ecol 7:37–55Google Scholar
  5. Frankel OH, Soulé ME (1981) Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Garson J, Justus J (2003) Conservation biology. In: Pfeifer J, Sarkar S (eds) The philosophy of science: an encyclopedia. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert FS (1980) The equilibrium theory of island biogeography: fact or fiction? J Biogeogr 7(3):209–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamilton TH, Rubinoff I, Barth RH Jr, Bush GL (1963) Species abundance: natural regulation of insular variation. Science 142:1575–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayden T (2007) Ground force. Nature 455:481–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Justus J, Sarkar S (2002) The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history. J Biosci 27:421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrinccetonGoogle Scholar
  12. Margules C, Higgs AJ, Rafe RW (1982) Modern biogeographic theory: are there any lessons for nature reserve design? Biol Conserv 24:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Margules CR, Nichols AO, Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol Conserv 43:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy DD (1990) Conservation biology and scientific method. Conserv Biol 4(2):203–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nilsson SG, Bengtsson J, As S (1988) Habitat diversity or area per se? Species richness of woody plants, carabid beetles, and land snails on islands. J Anim Ecol 57:685–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Putnam H (1974) The “corroboration” of theories. In: Schlipp PA (ed) The philosophy of Karl Popper. The Open Court Publishing Co., La Salle, pp 221–240Google Scholar
  17. Rodriguez ASL, Gaston KJ (2002) Rarity and conservation planning across geopolitical units. Conserv Biol 16(3):674–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Salmon W (1981) Rational prediction. Br J Philos Sci 34(2):115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sarkar S (2005) Biodiversity and environmental philosophy. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Schoener TW (1976) The species–area relation within archipelagos: models, evidence from island land birds. In: Frithand HJ, Calaby JH (eds) Proceedings of the 16th international ornithological congress. Australian Academy of Sciences, Canberra, pp 629–642Google Scholar
  22. Simberloff D (1988) The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:473–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simberloff D, Cox J (1987) Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conserv Biol 1(1):63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simberloff D, Wilson EO (1969) Experimental zoogeography of islands: defaunation and monitoring techniques. Ecology 50:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Soulé ME (1985) What is conservation biology? BioScience 35(11):727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (1980) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecology approach. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  27. Zimmerman BL, Bierregaard RO (1986) Relevance of the equilibrium theory of island biogeography and species–area relations to conservation with a case from Amazonia. J Biogeogr 13(2):133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biohumanities Project, School of History, Philosophy, Religion and ClassicsUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations