Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Occam’s Razor in science: a case study from biogeography

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson L. (1996) An ontological dilemma: epistemology and methodology of historical biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 23:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker A. (2003) Quantitative parsimony and explanation. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 54:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian V. (1997) Statistical inference, Occam’s Razor and statistical distributions. Neural Comput. 9:349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball I. (1976) Nature and formulation of biogeographical hypotheses. Syst. Zool. 24:407–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilaniuk O.-M., Sudarshan E. (1969) Particles beyond the light barrier. Phys. Today 22:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. (1998). Occam’s Razor and scientific method. In: Schirn (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics Today. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 195–214

  • Collins H., Pinch T. (1993) The Golem: What Everyone Should know about Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Croizat L. 1962. Space, Time, Form: The Biological Synthesis. Caracas.

  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London.

  • Darwin F. (ed.) 1901. Charles Darwin: Life and Letters. I. D. Appleton, New York

  • Dirac P. (1930) The Proton. Nature, London 126:606

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichman (1977) Zoography and the problem of land bridges. J. History Biol. 10(1):45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford K. (1963) Magnetic monopoles. Sci. Am. 209:122–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forster M. 2001. The new science of simplicity. In: Zellner A., Keuzenkamp H. and McAleer M. (eds), Simplicity, Inference and Modelling: Keeping It Sophisticatedly Simple. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–119

  • Forster M., Sober E. (1994) How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 45:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galileo G. 1962. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World System, transl. Drake, Berkeley.

  • Ghiselin M. (1969) The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley, University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N., Quine W. (1947) Steps towards a reconstructive nominalism. J. Symbolic Logic 12:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger K. (1981) Comment: the Blunting of Occam’s Razor. Can. J. Zool. 59:144–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner S. (1981) Problem solving and discovery in the growth of Darwin’s Theories of evolution. Synthese 47:119–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner S. (1985) Darwin’s and Wallace’s revolutionary research programme. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 36:367–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kragh H. (1981) The concept of the monopole: a historical and analytical case-study. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 12(2):141–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoisier A. 1862. Réflexions sur le Phlogistique. In: Oeuvres, Vol. 2. Imprimerie Impériale, Paris, pp. 623–624

  • Mikkelson G. (2001) Complexity and verisimilitude: realism for ecology. Biol. Philos. 16:533–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson G. (1978) From candolle to croizat: comments on the history of biogeography. J. Hist. Biol. 11(2):269–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I. (ed.) 1964. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Citadel Press, New York.

  • Shrader-Frechette K. 1990. Island Biogeography, Species-Area Curves, and Statistical Errors: Applied Biology and Scientific Rationality. Proceedings of the Biennial Meetings of the PSA, pp.␣447–456.

  • Simondo S. (2000) Island biogeography and the multiple domains of models. Biol. Philos. 15:239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson A. (1952) Probabilities of dispersal in geological time. Bull. Am. Museum Nat. Hist. 99:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart J. 1984. Ockham’s Razor. In: Principles of Philosophical Reasoning (ed.) Fetzer, pp. 118–28

  • Sober E. (1981) The principle of parsimony. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 32:145–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. 2001. What is the problem of simplicity? In: Zellner A., Keuzenkamp H. and McAleer M. (eds), Simplicity, Inference and Modelling: Keeping It Sophisticatedly Simple. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–31.

  • Wallace A. (1860) On the zoological geography of the malay archipelago. J. Proce. Linn. Soc. (Zoology) 4:172–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, N. 1988. Notes on Relativity and Electromagnetism. Lecture Notes, University of Oxford.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Swarthmore College, 500 College Avenue, Swarthmore, 19081, USA

    A. Baker

Authors
  1. A. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Baker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, A. Occam’s Razor in science: a case study from biogeography. Biol Philos 22, 193–215 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9027-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9027-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation