Abstract
Scientists’ language use in communication to or with the public has often been criticised as merely strategic. This article explores three terms employed in stem cell and genomic research, to support the hypothesis that biomedical terminology is heavily influenced by different legal, cultural, and ethical backgrounds in different societies. The word ‘pre-embryo’ has never been part of any acceptable official rhetoric in Germany but was important in Britain. The ‘toti-’, ‘pluri-’, or ‘multipotency’ of specific stem cells became a topical issue of scientific expertise in countries with strict regulations on embryo research. The distinction between ‘reproductive’ and ‘therapeutic’ cloning has become very common but problematic due to its obvious strategic purpose, and is intensely debated in the scientific community. The examination of these examples and the cultural framework in which they gain importance will demonstrate the mutual interconnectedness of biomedical science and social and cultural conditions. Separation of a purely descriptive terminology that belongs to science itself, adequately describing its discoveries, and a rhetoric that addresses external, non-scientific attitudes is impossible. Regulations, social discourses, and cultural traditions influence biomedical sciences, their scientific research projects and the terminology employed therein. Biomedical practices are considered ethically problematic not only by those external to the scientific realms, but also by some professionals participating in the research. Biomedical science is not a discrete field with clear boundaries and has to be re-conceptualized as an integral and important part of modern culture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno T.W. and Horkheimer M. 1947. Die Dialektik der Aufklärung, Amsterdam; engl.: Dialectic of Enlightenment. Herder & HerderNew York 1972.
A. Appadurai (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis
Bahnsen U. 2003. Eierstock aus der Retorte’, Die Zeit20/2003. see: http://www.zeit.de/2003/20/Stammzellen.
B. Barnes (1974) Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. London
H. Beier (1999) ArticleTitleDie Phänomene Totipotenz und Pluripotenz. Von der klassischen Embryologie zu neuen Therapiestrategien Reproduktionsmedizin 15 190–199
Beier H. 2002. Totipotenz und Pluripotenz. Von der klassischen Embryologie zu neuen Therapiestrategien. In: Oduncu F., Schroth R. and Vossenkuhl W. (eds), 2002, 36–54.
Bender W. 2001. Unbestimmbarkeit des moralischen Status humaner embryonaler Stammzellen? Zu einigen ethischen Problemen. In: Platzer K. and Ho¨ rner V. (eds), Optionen fü r eine Medizin der Zukunft? Prä implantationsdiagnostik und Stammzellforschung, Vol. 6. Speyrer Texte, 54–65.
Bender W. 2002. Ethische Aspekte und gesellschaftliche Folgen der Stammzellforschung. In: Hauskeller C.(eds.) 2002.
Best R. and Kushf G. 2005. The Stem Cell Controversy in the United States: Scientific, Philosophical, Political and Theological Aspects. In: Bender W., Hauskeller C. and Manzei A.(eds.) Crossing Borders – kulturellepolitische und religiöse Differenzen betreffend die Stammzellforschung. agenda-Verlag, Münster.
M. Black (1962) Models and Metaphors Cornell University Press IthacaNY
F.E. Bloom (1999) ArticleTitleBreakthroughs 1999 Science 286 2267
J.J. Bono (1995) The Word of God and the Languages of Man. Interpreting Nature in Early Modern Science and Medicine University of Wisconsin Press Madison
T.R. Brazelton F.M. Rossi G.I. Keshet H.M. Blau (2000) ArticleTitleFrom marrow to brain: Expression of neuronal phenotypes in adult mice Science 290 1775–1779 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.290.5497.1775
Breuer C. 2001. Die moraltheologische Problematik der In-vitro-Fertilisation, talk published at: http://www.kath-theologie.uni-osnabrueck.de/kug/symposien.htm.
T. Burdon et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSignaling mechanisms relating self-renewal and differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells Cells Tissues Organs 165 131–141 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000016693
Denker H.W. 2002. Forschung and embryonalen Stammzellen. Eine Diskussion der Begriffe Totipotenz und Pluripotenz. In: Oduncu F., Schroth R. and Vossenkuhl W. (eds), 2002, 19–35.
Department of Health 2004. Cloning Issues in Reproduction, Science and Medicine 1998. Http://www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/hgac/papers/papers_c.htm.
DFG 1999. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. DFG-Stellungnahme zum Problemkreis humane embryonale Stammzellen. http://www.dfg.de/aktuelles_presse/reden_stellungnahmen/archiv/humane_embryonak_stammzellen.html.
H. Driesch (1891) ArticleTitleEntwicklungsmechanische Studien I. Der Werth der beiden ersten Furchungszellen in der Echinodermenentwicklung. Experimentelle Erzeugung von Theil- und Doppelbildungen Zeitschrift wissenschaftliche Zoologie 53 160–184
Dupré J.A. 1993. The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Harvard University Press.
Epstein S. 1996. Impure Science, AIDS, Activism, And The Politics of Knowledge. University of California Press.
L. Fleck (1935) Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache [L. Schäfer and T. Schnelle1999], New Edition Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt am Main
Franklin S. 2003. Kinship, Genes, and Cloning. Life after Dolly. In: Goodman A.H., Heath D. and Lindee S. (eds). 2003.
Fujimura J.H. 2003. Future Imagineries, Genome Scientists as Sociocultural Entrepreneurs. In: Goodman A.H., Heath D. and Lindee S. (eds). 2003.
A.H. Goodmann D. Heath S. Lindee (Eds) (2003) Genetic Nature/Culture. Anthropology and Science beyond the Two-culture Divide University of California Press Berkeley
Griffiths P. and Stotz K. 2003. Representing Genes Project. http://www.pitt.edu/ kstotz/genes/genes.html.
C. Hauskeller (Eds) (2002) Humane Stammzellen. therapeutische Optionen, ökonomische Perspektiven, mediale Vermittlung Pabst Science Publishers Lengerich
Hauskeller C. 2004. How Traditions of Ethical Reasoning and Institutional Processes Shape Stem Cell Research in Britain. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Accepted for publication.
M. Hesse (1966) Models and Analogies in Science Sheed and Ward London & New York
K. Hübner et al. (2003) ArticleTitleDerivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells Science 300 1251–1256
Kitcher P. 1984. Species. In: Kitcher P. (ed.), In Mendel's Mirror. Philosophical Reflections on Biology. Oxford University Press.
G.C. Kopen D.J. Prockop D.G. Phinney (1999) ArticleTitleMarrow stromal cells migrate throughout forebrain and cerebellumand they differentiate into astrocystes after injection into neonatal mouse brains Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 10711–10716 Occurrence Handle10.1073/pnas.96.19.10711
C. Kummer (2000) ArticleTitleStammzellkulturen–ein brisantes Entwicklungspotential Stimmen der Zeit 218 547–554
G. Majo (2001) ArticleTitleDas Klonen im öffentlichen Diskurs. Über den Beitrag der Massenmedien zur Bioethikdiskussion Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 47 33–52
Martin E. 1996. The egg and the sperm. How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male–female roles. In: Keller E. and Longino H. (eds), Feminism and Science. Oxford University Press.
M. Mulkay (1979) Science and the Sociology of Knowledge Allen and Unwin London
M. Mulkay (1997) The embryo research debate University of Cambridge Press Cambridge
NBAC 1999. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical Issues in Human Stem cell ResearchVol. 1, Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission RockvilleMaryland: September 1999.
F. Oduncu R. Schroth W. Vossenkuhl (Eds) (2002) Stammzellforschung und therapeutisches Klonen Vandenhoek und Ruprecht Göttingen
M. Pesce et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLessons of totipotency from embryonic stem cells Cells Tissues Organs 165 144–152 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000016694
PCB 2002. President's Council on Bioethics, Human Cloning and Human Dignity, Public Affairs, New York
Pickstone J.V. 2000. Ways of Knowing. A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Manchester University Press.
Rheinberger H.-J. 2000. Gene-concepts: fragments form the perspective of molecular biology. In: Beurton P., Falk R. and Rheinberger H.-J. (eds), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
F. Seidel (1952) ArticleTitleDie Entwicklungspotenzen einer isolierten Blastomere des Zweizell-stadiums im Säugetierei Naturwissenschaften 39 355
S.L. Star J. Griesemer (1989) ArticleTitleInstitutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39 Soc. Stud. Sci. 19/3 387–420
B.J. Strasser (2003) ArticleTitleWho cares about the double helix? Collective memory links the past to the future in science as well as history Nature 422 803–804 Occurrence Handle10.1038/422803a
J.A. Thomson et al. (1998) ArticleTitleEmbryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts Science 282 1145–1147 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.282.5391.1145
G. Vogel (1999) ArticleTitleCapturing the promise of youth Science 286 2238–2239
B. Vogelstein B. Alberts K. Shine (2003) ArticleTitlePlease don’t call it cloning! Science 295 1237
Mary Warnock (1985) A Question of Life. The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Basil Blackwell Ltd. Oxford
D. Woodbury E.J. Schwarz D.J. Prockop I.B. Black (2000) ArticleTitleAdult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons J. Neurosci. Res. 61 364–370 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-4547(20000815)61:4<364::AID-JNR2>3.0.CO;2-C
Wulff H.J. 2002. Zwischen Phantasie und Diskurs - Motive als Topoi in den Spielfilmen und journalistischen Texten der Gentechnik. In: Hauskeller C.(ed). 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hauskeller, C. Science in Touch: Functions of Biomedical Terminology. Biol Philos 20, 815–835 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-2280-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-2280-x