, Volume 141, Issue 3, pp 487–501 | Cite as

Before the storm: antecedent conditions as regulators of hydrologic and biogeochemical response to extreme climate events

  • Sara K. McMillanEmail author
  • Henry F. Wilson
  • Christina L. Tague
  • Daniel M. Hanes
  • Shreeram Inamdar
  • Diana L. Karwan
  • Terry Loecke
  • Jonathan Morrison
  • Sheila F. Murphy
  • Philippe Vidon


While the influence of antecedent conditions on watershed function is widely recognized under typical hydrologic regimes, gaps remain in the context of extreme climate events (ECEs). ECEs are those events that far exceed seasonal norms of intensity, duration, or impact upon the physical environment or ecosystem. In this synthesis, we discuss the role of source availability and hydrologic connectivity on antecedent conditions and propose a conceptual framework to characterize system response to ECEs at the watershed scale. We present four case studies in detail that span a range of types of antecedent conditions and type of ECE to highlight important controls and feedbacks. Because ECEs have the potential to export large amounts of water and materials, their occurrence in sequence can disproportionately amplify the response. In fact, multiple events may not be considered extreme in isolation, but when they occur in close sequence they may lead to extreme responses in terms of both supply and transport capacity. Therefore, to advance our understanding of these complexities, we need continued development of a mechanistic understanding of how antecedent conditions set the stage for ECE response across multiple regions and climates, particularly since monitoring of these rare events is costly and difficult to obtain. Through focused monitoring of critical ecosystems during rare events we will also be able to extend and validate modeling studies. Cross-regional comparisons are also needed to define characteristics of resilient systems. These monitoring, modeling, and synthesis efforts are more critical than ever in light of changing climate regimes, intensification of human modifications of the landscape, and the disproportionate impact of ECEs in highly populated regions.


Extreme climate event Hydrology Sediment Nutrients Antecedent conditions 



This work is the result of discussions that were initiated at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Chapman Conference on Extreme Climate Event Impacts on Aquatic Biogeochemical Cycles and Fluxes held in San Juan, Puerto Rico in January 2017. We greatly appreciate the support of AGU, U.S. Department of Agricultural National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Award # 2016-67019-25280), U.S. Geological Survey, National Critical Zone Observatory, and National Science Foundation EPSCoR (Award #1641157) who made this conference possible. This manuscript was greatly improved by comments by James B. Shanley.


  1. Ali G, Wilson H, Elliott J, Penner A, Haque A, Ross C, Rabie M (2017) Phosphorus export dynamics and hydrobiogeochemical controls across gradients of scale, topography and human impact. Hydrol Process. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Kaisi MM, Elmore RW, Guzman JG, Hanna HM, Hart CE, Helmers MJ, Hodgson EW, Lenssen AW, Mallarino AP, Robertson AE, Sawyer JE (2013) Drought impact on crop production and the soil environment: 2012 experiences from Iowa. J Soil Water Conserv 68(1):19A–24ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amarawansha EAGS, Kumaragamage D, Flaten D, Zvomuya F, Tenuta M (2015) Phosphorus mobilization from manure-amended and unamended alkaline soils to overlying water during simulated flooding. J Environ Qual 44(4):1252–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahn M, Reichstein M, Dukes JS, Smith MD, McDowell NG (2014) Climate–biosphere interactions in a more extreme world. New Phytol 202(2):356–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balkcom KS, Blackmer AM, Hansen DJ, Morris TF, Mallarino AP (2003) Testing soils and cornstalks to evaluate nitrogen management on the watershed scale. J Environ Qual 32(3):1015–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu NB, Destouni G, Jawitz JW, Thompson SE, Loukinova NV, Darracq A, Zanardo S, Yaeger M, Sivapalan M, Rinaldo A, Rao PSC (2010) Nutrient loads exported from managed catchments reveal emergent biogeochemical stationarity. Geophys Res Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biron PM, Roy AG, Courschesne F, Hendershot WH, Côté B, Fyles J (1999) The effects of antecedent moisture conditions on the relationship of hydrology to hydrochemistry in a small forested watershed. Hydrol Process 11:1541–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bracken LJ, Wainwright J, Ali GA, Tetzlaff D, Smith MW, Reaney SM, Roy AG (2013) Concepts of hydrological connectivity: research approaches, pathways and future agendas. Earth Sci Rev 119:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T, Wagner W, Hasenauer S (2015) ASCAT soil wetness index validation through in situ and modeled soil moisture data in central Italy. Remote Sens Environ 114(11):2745–2755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burke MP, Hogue TS, Ferreira M, Mendez CB, Navarro B, Lopez S, Jay JA (2010) The effect of wildfire on soil mercury concentrations in Southern California watersheds. Water Air Soil Pollut 212(1–4):369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cannon SH, DeGraff J (2009) The increasing wildfire and post-fire debris-flow threat in Western USA, and implications for consequences of climate change. In: Sassa K, Canuti P (eds) Landslides—disaster risk reduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter SR, Booth EG, Kucharik CJ (2018) Extreme precipitation and phosphorus loads from two agricultural watersheds. Limnol Oceanogr 63(3):1221–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coombs JS, Melack JM (2013) Initial impacts of a wildfire on hydrology and suspended sediment and nutrient export in California chaparral watersheds. Hydrol Process 27(26):3842–3851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Couper P (2003) Effects of silt–clay content on the susceptibility of river banks to subaerial erosion. Geomorphology 56:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahm CN, Candelaria-Ley RI, Reale CS, Reale JK, Van Horn DJ (2015) Extreme water quality degradation following a catastrophic forest fire. Freshw Biol 60(12):2584–2599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis CA, Ward AS, Burgin AJ, Loecke TD, Riveros-Iregui DA, Schnoebelen DJ, Just CL, Thomas SA, Weber LJ, St Clair MA (2014) Antecedent moisture controls on stream nitrate flux in an agricultural watershed. J Environ Qual 43(4):1494–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dethier DP, Ouimet WB, Murphy SF, Kotikian M, Wicherski W, Samuels RM (2018) Anthropocene landscape change and the legacy of nineteenth-and twentieth-century mining in the Fourmile Catchment, Colorado Front Range. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 22:1–21Google Scholar
  18. Dhillon GS, Inamdar S (2013) Extreme storms and changes in particulate and dissolved organic carbon in runoff: entering uncharted waters? Geophys Res Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dhillon GS, Inamdar S (2014) Storm event patterns of particulate organic carbon for large storms and differences with dissolved organic carbon. Biogeochemistry 118(1):61–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dingman SL (2015) Physical hydrology. Waveland press, Long GroveGoogle Scholar
  21. Donovan M, Miller A, Baker M, Gellis A (2015) Sediment contributions from floodplains and legacy sediments to Piedmont streams of Baltimore County, Maryland. Geomorphology 235:88–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ebel BA, Mirus BB (2014) Disturbance hydrology: challenges and opportunities. Hydrol Process 28(19):5140–5148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ebel BA, Moody JA, Martin DA (2012) Hydrologic conditions controlling runoff generation immediately after wildfire. Water Resour Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eghball B, Power JF (1999) Phosphorus- and nitrogen-based manure and compost applications corn production and soil phosphorus. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(4):895–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fox GA, Purvis RA, Penn CJ (2016) Streambanks: a net source of sediment and phosphorus to streams. J Environ Manag 181:602–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fu Z, Li D, Hararuk O, Schwalm C, Luo Y, Yan L, Niu S (2017) Recovery time and state change of terrestrial carbon cycle after disturbance. Environ Res Lett 12(10):104004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gellis AC, Noe GB (2013) Sediment source analysis in Linganore Creek watershed, Maryland, USA, using the sediment fingerprinting approach: 2008 to 2010. J Soils Sedim 13:1735–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gellis AC, Hupp CR, Pavich MJ, Landwehr JM, Banks WSL, Hubbard BE, Langland MJ, Ritchie JC, Reuter JM (2009) Sources, transport, and storage of sediment at selected sites in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5186, Reston, pp 1–95Google Scholar
  30. Godsey SE, Kirchner JW, Clow DW (2009) Concentration-discharge relationships reflect chemostatic characteristics of US catchments. Hydrol Process 23:1844–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greaver TL, Clark CM, Compton JE, Vallano D, Talhelm AF, Weaver CP, Band LE, Baron JS, Davidson EA, Tague CL, Felker-Quinn E (2016) Key ecological responses to nitrogen are altered by climate change. Nat Clim Change 6(9):836–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grillakis MG, Koutroulis AG, Komma J, Tsanis IK, Wagner W, Blöschl G (2016) Initial soil moisture effects on flash flood generation—a comparison between basins of contrasting hydro-climatic conditions. J Hydrol 541:206–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hansen NC, Daniel TC, Sharpley AN, Lemunyon JL (2002) The fate and transport of phosphorus in agricultural systems. J Soil Water Conserv 57(6):408–417Google Scholar
  34. Havens K, Paerl H, Philips E, Zhu M, Beaver J, Sifra A (2016) Extreme weather events and climate variability provide a lens to how shallow lakes may respond to climate change. Water 8:229. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heggen RJ (2001) Normalized antecedent precipitation index. J Hydrol Eng 6(5):377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hornberger GM, Bencala KE, McKnight DM (1994) Hydrological controls on dissolved organic carbon during snowmelt in the Snake River near Montezuma, Colorado. Biogeochemistry 25(3):147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Inamdar S, Dhillon G, Singh S, Parr T, Qin Z (2015) Particulate nitrogen exports in stream runoff exceed dissolved nitrogen forms during large tropical storms in a temperate, headwater, forested watershed. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 120:1548–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Inamdar SP, Johnson E, Rowland RD, Warner D, Walter R, Merritts Dorothy (2017) Freeze-thaw processes and intense rainfall: the one-two punch for high sediment and nutrient loads from Mid-Atlantic watersheds. Biogeochemistry. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, p 151Google Scholar
  41. James LA (2013) Legacy sediment: definitions and processes of episodically produced anthropogenic sediment. Anthropocene 2:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kappes MS, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T (2012) Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards 64(2):1925–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larsen IJ, MacDonald LH, Brown E, Rough D, Welsh MJ, Pietraszek JH, Libohova Z, de Dios Benavides-Solorio J, Schaffrath K (2009) Causes of post-fire runoff and erosion: water repellency, cover, or soil sealing? Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1393–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lehmann P, Hinz C, McGrath G, Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ (2007) Rainfall threshold for hillslope outflow: an emergent property of flow pathway connectivity. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Disc 11(2):1047–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lintern A, Webb JA, Ryu D, Liu S, Bende-Michl U, Waters D, Leahy P, Wilson P, Western AW (2017) Key factors influencing differences in stream water quality across space. WIREs Water. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu K, Elliott JA, Lobb DA, Flaten DN, Yarotski J (2013) Critical factors affecting field-scale losses of nitrogen and phosphorus in spring snowmelt runoff in the Canadian prairies. J Environ Qual 42(2):484–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Loecke TD, Burgin AJ, Riveros-Iregui DA, Ward AS, Thomas SA, Davis CA, Clair MA (2017) Weather whiplash in agricultural regions drives deterioration of water quality. Biogeochemistry 133(1):7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lyons NJ, Starek MJ, Wegmann KW, Mitasova H (2015) Bank erosion of legacy sediment at the transition from vertical to lateral stream incision. Earth Surf Proc Land 40:1764–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Macrae ML, English MC, Schiff SL, Stone M (2010) Influence of antecedent hydrologic conditions on patterns of hydrochemical export from a first-order agricultural watershed in Southern Ontario, Canada. J Hydrol 389:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maher K (2011) The role of fluid residence time and topographic scales in determining chemical fluxes from landscapes. Earth Planet Sci Lett 312:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McClain ME, Boyer EW, Dent CL, Gergel SE, Grimm NB, Groffman PM, Hart SC, Harvey JW, Johnston CA, Mayorga E, McDowell WH (2003) Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 6(4):301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McDowell WH, Liptzin D (2014) Linking soils and streams: response of soil solution chemistry to simulated hurricane disturbance mirrors stream chemistry following a severe hurricane. For Ecol Manag 332:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McDowell WH, Brereton RL, Scatena FN, Shanley JB, Brokaw NV, Lugo AE (2013) Interactions between lithology and biology drive the long-term response of stream chemistry to major hurricanes in a tropical landscape. Biogeochemistry 116:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McLauchlan KK, Higuera PE, Gavin DG, Perakis SS, Mack MC, Alexander H, Battles J, Biondi F, Buma B, Colombaroli D, Enders SK (2014) Reconstructing disturbances and their biogeochemical consequences over multiple timescales. Bioscience 64(2):105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McMillan SK, Noe GB (2017) Increasing floodplain connectivity through urban stream restoration increases nutrient and sediment retention. Ecol Eng 108:284–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Melillo, Jerry M., Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and Gary W. Yohe, Eds. (2014) Highlights of climate change impacts in the united states: the third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, 148 ppGoogle Scholar
  57. Merritts D, Walter R, Rahnis M, Hartranft J, Cox S, Gellis A, Potter N, Hilgartner W, Langland M, Manion L, Lippincott C, Siddiqui S, Rehman Z, Scheid C, Kratz L, Shilling A, Jenschke M, Datin K, Cranmer E, Reed A, Matuszewski D, Voli M, Ohlson E, Neugebauer A, Ahamed A, Neal C, Winter A, Becker S (2011) Anthropocene streams and base-level controls from historic dams in the unglaciated mid-Atlantic region, USA. Philos Trans R Soc A 369:976–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Merritts D, Walter RC, Rahnis M, Cox S, Hartranft J, Scheid C, Potter N, Jenschke M, Reed A, Matuszewski D, Kratz L, Manion L, Shilling A, Datin K (2013) The rise and fall of Mid-Atlantic streams: millpond sedimentation, milldam breaching, channel incision, and streambank erosion. In: De Graff JV, Evans JE (eds) The challenges of dam removal and river restoration: geological society of America reviews in engineering geology, vol XXI. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moody JA, Ebel BA (2012) Hyper-dry conditions provide new insights into the cause of extreme floods after wildfire. CATENA 93:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moody JA, Shakesby RA, Robichaud PR, Cannon SH, Martin DA (2013) Current research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes. Earth-Sci Rev 122:10–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Murphy SF (2006) State of the watershed: Water quality of Boulder Creek Colorado. Circular 1284, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. Accessed December 1, 2014.
  62. Murphy SF, McCleskey RB Writer JH (2012) Effects of flow regime on stream turbidity and suspended solids after wildfire, Colorado Front Range, U.S.A., Wildfire and water quality—processes, impacts, and challenges (Proceedings of the conference held in Banff, Canada, June 2012) IAHS Publ. 354, IAHS Press, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  63. Murphy SF, Writer JH, McCleskey RB, Martin DA (2015) The role of precipitation type, intensity, and spatial distribution in source water quality after wildfire. Environ Rese Lett 10(8):084007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Neary DG, Ryan KC, DeBano LF (2005) Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on soils and water USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-42Google Scholar
  65. Noe GB, Hupp CR (2005) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus accumulation in floodplains of Atlantic Coastal Plain rivers, USA. Ecol Appl 15(4):1178–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peterson TC, Heim RR Jr, Hirsch R, Kaiser DP, Brooks H, Diffenbaugh NS, Dole RM, Giovannettone JP, Guirguis K, Karl TR, Katz RW (2013) Monitoring and understanding changes in heat waves, cold waves, floods, and droughts in the United States: state of knowledge. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94(6):821–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pizzuto J, O’Neal M (2009) Increased mid-twentieth century riverbank erosion rates related to the demise of mill dams, South River, Virginia. Geology 37:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Randall GW, Mulla DJ (2001) Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influenced by climatic conditions and agricultural practices. J Environ Qual 30(2):337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Randall GW, Huggins DR, Russelle MP, Fuchs DJ, Nelson WW, Anderson JL (1997) Nitrate losses through subsurface tile drainage in Conservation Reserve Program, alfalfa, and row crop systems. J Environ Qual 26(5):1240–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rose LA, Karwan DL, Aufdenkampe AK (2018) Sediment fingerprinting suggests differential suspended particulate matter formation and transport processes across hydrologic regimes. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rustad Lindsey E, Campbell John L (2012) A novel ice storm manipulation experiment in a northern hardwood forest. Can J For Res 42:1810–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sadro S, Melack JM (2012) The effect of an extreme rain event on the biogeochemistry and ecosystem metabolism of an oligotrophic high-elevation lake. Arct Antarct Alp Res 44(2):222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saxe S, Hogue TS, Hay L (2018) Characterization and evaluation of controls on post-fire streamflow response across western US watersheds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22(2):1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shanley JB, McDowell WH, Stallard RF (2011) Long-term patterns and short-term dynamics of stream solutes and suspended sediment in a rapidly weathering tropical watershed. Water Resour Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sharpley A, Jarvie HP, Buda A, May L, Spears B, Kleinman P (2013) Phosphorus legacy: overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment. J Environ Qual 42:1308–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Simard RR, Beauchemin S, Haygarth PM (2000) Potential for preferential pathways of phosphorus transport. J Environ Qual 29(1):97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith MD (2011) An ecological perspective on extreme climatic events: a synthetic definition and framework to guide future research. J Ecol 99:656–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. State of California (2018) Thomas Fire Final Report. State of California Watershed Emergency Response Team, CA-VNC- 103156, released 26 February 2018, 241 ppGoogle Scholar
  80. Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ (2006) Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis. Water Resour Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Turgeon JM, Courchesne F (2008) Hydrochemical behaviour of dissolved nitrogen and carbon in a headwater stream of the Canadian Shield: relevance of antecedent soil moisture conditions. Hydrol Process 22(3):327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV, Kratz TK (1993) A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landsc Ecol 8(3):213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vidon P, Karwan D, Andres A, Inamdar S, Kaushal S, Morrison J, Mullaney J, Ross D, Schroth A, Shanley J, Yoon B (2018) In the path of the hurricane: impact of Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee on watershed hydrology and biogeochemistry from North Carolina to Maine, USA. Biogeochemistry. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Voli MT, Wegmann KW, Bohnenstiehl DR, Leithold E, Osburn CL, Polyakov V (2013) Fingerprinting the sources of suspended sediment delivery to a large municipal drinking water reservoir: Falls Lake, Neuse River, North Carolina, USA. J Soils Sedim 13:1692–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Walter RC, Merritts DJ (2008) Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science 319:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wegmann KW, Lewis RQ, Hunt MC (2012) Historic mill ponds and Piedmont stream water quality: making the connection near Raleigh, North Carolina. In: Eppes MC, Bartholomew MJ (eds) From the blue ridge to the coastal plain: field excursions in the Southeastern United States: Geological Society of America Field Guide, vol 29. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 93–121Google Scholar
  87. Weiler M, McDonnell JJ (2006) Testing nutrient flushing hypotheses at the hillslope scale: a virtual experiment approach. J Hydrol 319(1):339–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weitzmann JN, Forshay KJ, Kaye JP, Mayer PM, Koval JC, Walter RC (2014) Potential nitrogen and carbon processing in a landscape rich in milldam legacy sediments. Biogeochemistry 120:337–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wohl E, Lininger KB, Scott DN (2017) River beads as a conceptual framework for building carbon storage and resilience to extreme climate events into river management. Biogeochemistry. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wolman MG (1959) Factors influencing erosion of a cohesive river bank. Am J Sci 257:204–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Writer JH, Murphy SF (2012) Wildfire effects on source-water quality - lessons from Fourmile Canyon Fire, Colorado, and implications for drinking-water treatment, U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2012-3095, RestonGoogle Scholar
  92. Writer JH, McCleskey RB, Murphy SF (2012) Effects of wildfire on source-water quality and aquatic ecosystems, Colorado Front Range, Wildfire and water quality—processes, impacts, and challenges (Proceedings of the conference held in Banff, Canada, June 2012) IAHS Publ. 354, IAHS Press, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  93. Yellen B, Woodruff JD, Cook TL, Newton RM (2016) Historically unprecedented erosion from Tropical Storm Irene due to high antecedent precipitation. Earth Surf Proc Land 41:677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Young EO, Ross DS (2001) Phosphate release from seasonally flooded soils. J Environ Qual 30:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zehe E, Blöschl G (2004) Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: role of initial conditions. Water Resour Res 40(10):W10202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zhao L, Gray DM, Male DH (1997) Numerical analysis of simultaneous heat and mass transfer during infiltration into frozen ground. J Hydrol 200(1):345–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara K. McMillan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Henry F. Wilson
    • 2
  • Christina L. Tague
    • 3
  • Daniel M. Hanes
    • 4
  • Shreeram Inamdar
    • 5
  • Diana L. Karwan
    • 6
  • Terry Loecke
    • 7
  • Jonathan Morrison
    • 8
  • Sheila F. Murphy
    • 9
  • Philippe Vidon
    • 10
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaBrandonCanada
  3. 3.University of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.St. Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  5. 5.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  6. 6.University of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  7. 7.University of KansasLawrenceUSA
  8. 8.U.S. Geological SurveyEast HartfordUSA
  9. 9.U.S. Geological SurveyBoulderUSA
  10. 10.SUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations