Phosphorus release from the drying and reflooding of diverse shallow sediments
- 496 Downloads
Phosphorus (P) retention is an important ecosystem service provided by sediments and soils. However, when shallow aquatic sediments and poorly drained soils dry and re-flood, they can be a source, rather than a sink, of P. Using experimental drying and re-flooding in the laboratory, we assessed the resultant sediment–water P exchange in a biogeochemically diverse set of sediments from 16 sites in Michigan. The direction and magnitude of P exchange to pore waters and surface waters upon re-flooding varied among sediments. Different sediment properties were related to P release to pore water than to P release to overlying surface water, suggesting that different processes control two phases of sediment P release: mobilization from solid to dissolved forms in the sediment pore water; and movement of dissolved P from pore water into overlying surface water. We observed especially high P release in dried and re-flooded sediments with high amounts of loosely sorbed phosphate, suggesting that drained sediments with a legacy of high P loads will be most likely to release P and experience internal eutrophication when re-flooded. The differential responses of sediments suggest that aquatic ecosystem restoration and management for nutrient removal must be evaluated with site-specific knowledge of sediment and soil biogeochemistry.
KeywordsWater level fluctuations Wetland restoration Sediment Soil Phosphorus Iron
We are grateful to Henning S. Jensen and colleagues at the University of Southern Denmark for valuable advice on sequential phosphorus extraction techniques. Thanks to David Weed, Jen Pham, Laura Podzikowski, David Kinsman, Steve Robbins, Brandon Kovnat, Rob Davis, Paige Howell, David Costello, and Megan Lowenberg for lab and field support. Allen Burton and his lab at the University of Michigan provided protocols and logistical support for measuring acid volatile sulfides in sediments. Early drafts of this manuscript were improved by comments from Alan Steinman and R. Jan Stevenson. This research was funded by National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology grants 0743402, 0423627, 0910008 and 1027253.
- Allen HE, Fu G, Boothman W, et al (1991) Determination of acid volatile sulfides (AVS) and simultaneously extracted metals in sediment: draft analytical method for determination of acid volatile sulfide in sediment.US Environmental Protection Agency, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300Google Scholar
- Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2009) Treatment Wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Pinheiro JC, Bates D (2004) Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Pryor SC, Scavia D, Downer C et al (2014) Midwest (Chap 18). In: Melillo J, Richmond T, Yohe G (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. US Global Change Research Program, Washington, pp 418–440Google Scholar
- Reitzel K (2005) Separation of aluminum bound phosphate from iron bound phosphate in freshwater sediments by a sequential extraction procedure. In: 4th International Symposium on Phosphate in Sediments, BackhuysGoogle Scholar
- Roden EE, Edmonds JW (1997) Phosphate mobilization in iron-rich anaerobic sediments: microbial Fe(III) oxide reduction versus iron-sulfide formation. Arch Fur Hydrobiol 139:347–378Google Scholar
- Team RDC (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology: lake and river ecosystems, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar