, Volume 127, Issue 2–3, pp 339–351 | Cite as

Limited variation in proportional contributions of auto- and heterotrophic soil respiration, despite large differences in vegetation structure and function in the Low Arctic

  • Sean M. P. Cahoon
  • Patrick F. Sullivan
  • Cassandra Gamm
  • Jeffrey M. Welker
  • David Eissenstat
  • Eric Post


Arctic ecosystems contain vast stores of soil carbon (C), yet our understanding of the factors controlling CO2 efflux from tundra soils remains poor. Partitioning soil respiration (R S) into heterotrophic (R H) and autotrophic (R A) sources can help elucidate the relative contributions from microbial breakdown of soil organic matter (SOM) and root and rhizospheric activities—two processes that can have contrasting effects on long-term soil C stocks. Using two techniques, we quantified the magnitudes, relative proportions and environmental drivers of R H and R A in four common arctic vegetation types in West Greenland. We employed a trenching method in large patches of Betula nana, Salix glauca, mixed-shrub (equal mix of Betula and Salix) and graminoids dominated by Poa spp. At a nearby location, we introduced 13CO2 to Betula- and graminoid-dominated plots. The difference in the autotrophic proportion (R A/R S) between methods was minimal, providing confidence that our more extensive trenching approach provided accurate estimates of R A and R H. Despite contrasting microclimate conditions, large differences in vegetation structure and wide variation in R S, there were minimal differences in mean R A/R S (0.40–0.48 across all vegetation types). Our results suggest that R A/R S may be more conservative than previously thought for low-productivity ecosystems. We suggest that partitioning R S into R A and R H may be a useful tool to identify ecosystems that have fallen out of equilibrium and may be poised to either gain or lose soil C.


Arctic Carbon 13C labeling Respiration partitioning 



Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation grant numbers PLR1107381 awarded to E. Post and D. Eissenstat and PLR1108425 awarded to P. Sullivan and J. Welker. We are grateful for field assistance from E. McKnight, C. Cairns, O. Niziolek, M. Holdrege, N. Izral, E. Samuel and J. Florence.

Supplementary material

10533_2016_184_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1389 kb)


  1. Andersen CP, Nikolov I, Nikolova P, Matyssek R, Häberle K-H (2005) Estimating “autotrophic” belowground respiration in spruce and beech forests: decreases following girdling. Eur J For Res 124:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr AG, Griffis TJ, Black TA, Lee X, Staebler RM, Fuentes JD, Chen Z, Morgenstern K (2002) Comparing the carbon budgets of boreal and temperate deciduous forest stands. Can J For Res 32:813–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billings WD, Peterson KM, Shaver GR, Trent AW (1977) Root growth, respiration, and carbon dioxide evolution in an arctic tundra soil. Arctic Apl Res 9:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Björkman MP, Morgner E, Björk RG, Cooper EJ, Elberling B, Klemedtsson L (2010) A comparison of annual and seasonal carbon dioxide effluxes between sub-Arctic Sweden and High-Arctic Svalbard. Polar Res 29:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blok D, Heijmans MMPD, Schaepman-Strub G, Kononov AV, Maximov TC, Berendse F (2010) Shrub expansion may reduce summer permafrost thaw in Siberian tundra. Glob Change Biol 16:1296–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A (2010) A global database of soil respiration data. Biogeosciences 7:1915–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST (2004) A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration? Glob Change Biol 10:1756–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahoon SMP, Sullivan PF, Post E (in press) Carbon and water relations of contrasting Arctic plants: implications for shrub expansion in West Greenland. EcosphereGoogle Scholar
  9. Cahoon SMP, Sullivan PF, Shaver GR, Welker JM, Post E (2012) Interactions among shrub cover and the soil microclimate may determine future Arctic carbon budgets. Ecol Lett 15:1415–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carbone MS, Czimczik CI, McDuffee KE, Trumbore SE (2007) Allocation and residence time of photosynthetic products in a boreal forest using a low-level 14C pulse-chase labeling technique. Glob Change Biol 13:466–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlyle JC, Ba Than U (1988) Abiotic controls of soil respiration beneath an eighteen-year-old Pinus radiata stand in south-eastern Australia. J Ecol 76:654–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapin III FS, Miller PC, Billings WD, Coyne PI (1980) Carbon and nutrient budgets and their control in coastal tundra. In: Brown J, Miller PC, Tieszen LL, Bunnell FL (eds) An Arctic Ecosystem: the Coastal Tundra at Barrow, Alaska.  Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc, Stroudsburg PA, pp. 458–482Google Scholar
  13. Christensen TR, Jonasson S, Michelsen A, Callaghan TV, Havström M (1998) Environmental controls on soil respiration in the Eurasian and Greenlandic Arctic. J Geophys Res 103:29015–29021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Glob Change Biol 4:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennis JG, Johnson PL (1970) Shoot and rhizome-root standing crops of tundra vegetation at Barrow, Alaska. Arct Antarct Alp Res 2:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dorrepaal E, Toet S, van Logtestjin RSP, Swart E, van de Weg MJ, Callaghan TV, Aerts R (2009) Carbon respiration from subsurface peat accelerated by climate warming in the subarctic. Nature 460:616–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehleringer JR, Buchmann N, Flanagan LB (2000) Carbon isotope ratios in belowground carbon cycle processes. Ecol Appl 10:412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elberling B (2007) Annual soil CO2 effluxes in the High Arctic: the role of snow thickness and vegetation type. Soil Biol Biochem 39:646–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Epron D, Farque L, Lucot E, Badot P-M (1999) Soil CO2 efflux in a beech forest: the contribution of root respiration. Ann For Sci 56:289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrews JA (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry 48:115–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hicks Pries CE, Schuur EAG, Crummer KG (2013) Thawing permafrost increases old soil and autotrophic respiration in tundra: partitioning ecosystem respiration using δ13C and ∆14C. Glob Change Biol 19:649–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hicks Pries CE, van Logtestjin RSP, Schuur EAG, Natali SM, Cornelissen JHC, Aerts R, Dorrepaal E (2015) Decadal warming causes a consistent and persistent shift from heterotrophic to autotrophic respiration in contrasting permafrost ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 21:4508–4519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hobbie SE (1996) Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaska tundra. Ecol Monogr 66:503–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Högberg P, Nordgren A, Buchman N, Taylor AFS, Ekblad A, Högberg MN et al (2001) Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature 411:789–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Illeris L, Christensen TR, Mastepanov M (2004) Moisture effects on temperature sensitivity of CO2 exchange in a subarctic heath ecosystem. Biogeochemistry 70:315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Janssens IA, Lankreijer H, Matteucci G, Kowalski AS, Buchmann N, Epron D et al (2001) Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Glob Change Biol 7:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaufman DS, Schneider DP, McKay NP, Ammann CM, Bradley RS, Briffa KR et al (2009) Recent warming reverses long-term arctic cooling. Science 325:1236–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuzyakov Y (2006) Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil Biol Biochem 38:425–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuzyakov Y, Gavrichkova O (2010) Time lag between photosynthesis and carbon dioxide efflux from soil: a review of mechanisms and controls. Glob Change Biol 16:3386–3406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Law BE, Ryan MG, Anthoni PM (1999) Seasonal and annual respiration of ponderosa pine ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 5:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Legendre P (2014) lmodel2: Model II Regression R package version 1.7-2.
  32. Lenth RV, Hervé M (2014) lsmeans: least-squares means. R package version 2.13.
  33. Litton CM, Ryan MG, Knight DH, Stahl PD (2003) Soil-surface carbon dioxide efflux and microbial biomass in relation to tree density 13 years after a stand replacing fire in a lodgepole pine ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 9:680–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McConnell NA, Turetsky MR, McGuire AD, Kane ES, Wadrop MP, Harden JW (2013) Controls on ecosystem and root respiration across a permafrost and wetland gradient in interior Alaska. Environ Res Lett 8:045029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGuire AD, Christensen TR, Hayes D, Heroult A, Euskirchen E, Kimball JS et al (2012) An assessment of the carbon balance of Arctic tundra: comparisons among observations, process models, and atmospheric inversions. Biogeosciences 9:3185–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Musselman RC, Massman WJ, Frank JM, Korfmacher JL (2005) The temporal dynamics of carbon dioxide under snow in a high elevation Rocky Mountain subalpine forest and meadow. Arct Antarct Alp Res 37:527–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nadelhoffer K, Giblin AE, Shaver GR, Laundre JA (1991) Effects of temperature and substrate quality on element mineralization in six arctic soils. Ecology 72:242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakatsubo T, Bekku Y, Koizumi H (1998) Respiration of the belowground parts of vascular plants: its contribution to total soil respiration on a successional glacier foreland in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Polar Res 17:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ngao J, Longdoz B, Granier A, Epron D (2007) Estimation of autotrophic and heterotrophic components of soil respiration by trenching is sensitive to corrections for root decomposition and changes in soil water content. Plant Soil 301:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pataki DE, Ehleringer JR, Flanagan LB, Yakir D, Bowling DR, Still CJ et al (2003) The application and interpretation of Keeling plots in terrestrial carbon cycle research. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. doi: 10.1029/2001GB001850 Google Scholar
  41. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2001) Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia 127:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2015) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-120.>
  43. Post E, Pederson C (2008) Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:12353–12358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  45. Rey A, Pegoraro E, Tedeschi V, De Parri I, Jarvis PG, Velentini R (2002) Annual variation in soil respiration and its components in a coppice oak forest in Central Italy. Glob Change Biol 8:851–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Mitchell MJ, Hartley AE et al (2001) A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schimel D (2013) Climate and ecosystems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  48. Schimel JP, Gulledge JM, Clein-Curley JS, Lindstrom JE, Braddock JF (1999) Moisture effects on microbial activity and community structure in decomposing birch litter in the Alaskan taiga. Soil Biol Biochem 31:831–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schlesinger WH (1997) The global carbon cycle. In: Schlesinger WH (ed) Biogeochemistry: an anlysis of global change, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 358–382Google Scholar
  50. Segal AD, Sullivan PF (2014) Identifying the sources and uncertainties of ecosystem respiration in Arctic tussock tundra. Biogeochemistry 121:489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Subke J-A, Inglima I, Cotrufo F (2006) Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO2 efflux partitioning: a metaanalytical review. Glob Change Biol 12:921–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Subke J-A, Vallack HW, Magnusson T, Keel SG, Metcalfe DB, Högberg P, Ineson P (2009) Short-term dynamics of abiotic and biotic soil 13CO2 effluxes after in situ 13CO2 pulse labelling of a boreal pine forest. New Phytol 183:349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Subke J-A, Heinemeyer A, Vallack HW, Leronni V, Baxter R, Ineson P (2012) Fast assimilate turnover revealed by in situ 13CO2 pulse-labelling in Subarctic tundra. Polar Biol 35:1209–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sullivan PF, Arens SJT, Sveinbjörnsson B, Welker JM (2010) Modeling the seasonality of belowground respiration along an elevation gradient in the western Chugach Mountains, Alaska. Biogeochemistry 101:61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sveinbjörnsson B, Oechel WC (1981) Controls on CO2 exchange in two Polytrichum moss species. Field studies on the tundra near Barrow, Alaska. Oikos 36:114–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tarnocai C, Canadell JG, Schuur EAG, Kuhry P, Mazhitova G, Zimov S (2009) Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Global Biogeochem Cycle. doi: 10.1029/2008GB003327 Google Scholar
  57. Trumbore S (2006) Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems—recent progress and challenges. Glob Change Biol 12:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vargas R, Carbone MS, Reichstein M, Baldocchi DD (2011) Frontiers and challenges in soil respiration research: from measurements to model-data integration. Biogeochemistry 102:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vogel JG, Valentine DW (2005) Small root exclusion collars provide reasonable estimates of root respiration when measured during the growing season of installation. Can J For Res 35:2112–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walker DA et al (2005) The circumpolar arctic vegetation map. J Veg Sci 16:267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wardle DA (2002) Communities and ecosystems—linking the aboveground and belowground components. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  62. Warren JM, Iversen CM, Garten CT Jr, Norby RJ, Childs J, Brice D et al (2014) Timing and magnitude of C partitioning through a young loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stand using 13C labeling and shade treatments. Tree Phys 32:799–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yuste JC, Janssens IA, Carrara A, Ceulemans R (2004) Annual Q10 of soil respiration reflects plant phenological patterns as well as temperature sensitivity. Glob Change Biol 10:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean M. P. Cahoon
    • 1
  • Patrick F. Sullivan
    • 2
  • Cassandra Gamm
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jeffrey M. Welker
    • 3
  • David Eissenstat
    • 4
  • Eric Post
    • 1
  1. 1.The Polar Center and Department of BiologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Environment and Natural Resources InstituteUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA
  4. 4.Department of Ecosystem Science and ManagementPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations