Biogeochemistry

, Volume 127, Issue 2–3, pp 323–338 | Cite as

Rapid wood decay and nutrient mineralization in an old-growth bottomland hardwood forest

  • Matthew C. Ricker
  • B. Graeme Lockaby
  • Gavin D. Blosser
  • William H. Conner
Article

Abstract

Downed woody debris is an important component of the forest floor, responsible for long-term storage of nutrients in many ecosystems. In large floodplain forests of the southeastern United States, wood loads are relatively low, suggesting these landscapes may promote rapid decomposition and nutrient turnover rates. The goals of this study were to identify the major factors responsible for wood decomposition and associated nutrient dynamics in an old-growth floodplain forest at Congaree National Park, South Carolina (USA). In situ decomposition and nutrient dynamics were quantified for 700 days (April 2011–March 2013) using wood from a common overstory species, red maple (Acer rubrum L.). During the study period, regional drought conditions allowed red imported fire ant (RIFA, Solenopsis invicta Buren) colonization and infestation of the study wood after 183 days in the field. Carbon (C) content decreased throughout the study, indicating net mineralization was occurring year-round. Invertebrate activity contributed to extremely fast decomposition rates (mean k 0.650 ± 0.02 year−1) and wood turnover times (mean 4.79 ± 0.15 years). In contrast to C, wood nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content increased following RIFA infestation, displaying net nutrient immobilization. The rapid turnover rates measured at CONG indicate that the C storage function of woody debris may be diminished, but availability of mineralized N and P may also have increased the importance of wood stocks to support forest net primary productivity.

Keywords

Wood decomposition Old-growth forest Floodplain biogeochemistry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for field and laboratory assistance provided by Robin Governo, Andrew Parsons, Robert Price, Lauren Behnke, Nate Click, Meg Bloodworth, Catherine Justice, Theresa Thom, Cliff Hupp, Ed Schenk, Frank Henning, and David Shelley. We also would like to thank Joey Shaw and Yucheng Feng who helped improve draft versions of this manuscript. Funding and support for this research was provided by the United States Geological Survey, the United States National Park Service, and the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture under project number SC-1700424. Technical Contribution No. 6408 of the Clemson University Experiment Station.

Supplementary material

10533_2016_183_MOESM1_ESM.docx (5.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 5331 kb)

References

  1. Adams CT (1986) Agricultural and medical impact of the imported fire ants. In: Lofgren CS, Vander Meer RK (eds) Fire ants and leaf-cutting ants, biology and management. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 48–57Google Scholar
  2. Allen CR, Epperson DM, Garmestani AS (2004) Red imported fire ant impacts on wildlife: a decade of research. Am Midl Nat 152:88–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks WA, Adams CT, Lofgren CS (1991) Damage to young citrus trees by red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Econ Entomol 84:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastow JL, Preisser EL, Strong DR (2008) Wood decomposition following a perennial lupine die-off: a 3-year litterbag study. Ecosystems 11:442–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bedford BL, Walbridge MR, Aldous A (1999) Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80:2151–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bender MR, Wood CW (2003) Influence of red imported fire ants on greenhouse gas emissions from a Piedmont Plateau pasture. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 34:1873–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg B, McClaugherty C (2008) Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bocock KL (1964) Changes in the amounts of dry matter, nitrogen, carbon and energy in decomposing woodland leaf litter in relation to the activities of soil fauna. J Ecol 52:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braccia A, Batzer DP (2008) Breakdown and invertebrate colonization of dead wood in wetland, upland, and river habitats. Can J For Res 38:2697–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buxton RD (1981) Termites and the turnover of dead wood in an arid tropical environment. Oecologia 51:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambers JQ, Higuchi N, Schimel JP, Ferreira LV, Melack JM (2000) Decomposition and carbon cycling of dead trees in tropical forests of the central Amazon. Oecologia 122:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chueng N, Brown S (1995) Decomposition of silver maple (Acer saccharinum L.) woody debris in a central Illinois bottomland forest. Wetlands 15:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark DB, Clark DA, Brown S, Oberbauer SF, Veldkamp E (2002) Stocks and flows of coarse woody debris across a tropical rain forest nutrient and topography gradient. For Ecol Manag 164:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Currie WS, Yanai RD, Piatek KB, Prescott CE, Goodale CL (2002) Processes affecting carbon storage in the forest floor and in downed woody debris. In: Kimble JM et al (eds) The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 135–157Google Scholar
  15. Day FP (1982) Litter decomposition rates in the seasonally flooded Great Dismal Swamp. Ecology 63:670–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Day FP (1983) Effects of flooding on leaf litter decomposition in microcosms. Oecologia 56:180–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delaney M, Brown S, Lugo AE, Torres-Lezama A, Quintero NB (1998) The quantity and turnover of dead wood in permanent forest plots in six life zones of Venezuela. Biotropica 30:2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis Part 1, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 383–411Google Scholar
  19. Green WP, Pettry DE, Switzer RE (1998) Impact of imported fire ants on the texture and fertility of Mississippi soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:447–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green WP, Pettry DE, Switzer RE (1999) Structure and hydrology of mounds of the imported fire ants in the southeastern United States. Geoderma 93:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harmon ME, Hua C (1991) Coarse woody debris dynamics in two old-growth ecosystems. Bioscience 41:604–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K Jr, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  25. Koch P (1985) Utilization of hardwoods growing on southern pine sites. Forest service agricultural handbook number 605. Government Printing Office, Washington DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lafleur B, Hooper-Bui LM, Mumma EP, Geaghan JP (2005) Soil fertility and plant growth in soils from forests and plantations: effect of invasive imported fire ants Solenopsis invicta (Buren). Pedobiologia 49:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laiho R, Prescott CE (2004) Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis. Can J For Res 34:763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lockaby BG, Adams JC (1985) Pedoturbation of a forest soil by fire ants. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:220–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mattson KG, Swank WT, Waide JB (1987) Decomposition of woody debris in a regenerating, clear-cut forest in the southern Appalachians. Can J For Res 17:712–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morrison LW (2002) Long-term impacts of an arthropod-community invasion by imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Ecology 83:2337–2345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller RN (2003) Landscape patterns of change in coarse woody debris accumulation in an old-growth deciduous forest on the Cumberland Plateau, southeastern Kentucky. Can J For Res 33:763–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Polit JI, Brown S (1996) Mass and nutrient content of dead wood in a central Illinois floodplain forest. Wetlands 16:488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pregitzer KS, Euskirchen EN (2004) Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Glob Change Biol 10:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Putz FE, Sharitz RR (1991) Hurricane damage to old-growth forest in Congaree Swamp National Monument, South Carolina, USA. Can J For Res 21:1765–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rice MD, Lockaby BG, Stanturf JA, Keeland BJ (1997) Woody debris decomposition in the Atchafalaya River Basin of Louisiana following hurricane disturbance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1264–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schilling EB, Lockaby BG (2005) Microsite influence on productivity and nutrient circulation within two southeastern floodplain forests. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1185–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Soil Survey Laboratory Staff (2004) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil survey investigation report 42 version 4.0. Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Soil Survey Staff (2013) Web soil survey: Soil data mart. NRCS, Washington DC. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed 18 July 2013
  41. Taylor BR, Parkinson D, Parsons WFJ (1989) Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test. Ecology 70:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tyrrell LE, Crow TR (1994) Dynamics of dead wood in old-growth hemlock-hardwood forests of northern Wisconsin and northern Michigan. Can J For Res 24:1672–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1968) Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid detergent fiber with permanganate. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 51:780–785Google Scholar
  44. Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waddell KL (2002) Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple attributes in extensive resource inventories. Ecol Ind 1:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Warren RJ II, Bradford MA (2012) Ant colonization and coarse woody debris decomposition in temperate forests. Insectes Sociaux 59:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilder SM, Holway DA, Suarez AV, LeBrun EG, Eubanks MD (2011) Intercontinental differences in resource use reveal the importance of mutualisms in fire ant invasions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:20639–20644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wohl E (2013) Floodplains and wood. Earth Sci Rev 123:194–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wohl E, Polvi LE, Cadol D (2011) Wood distribution along streams draining old-growth floodplain forests in Congaree National Park, South Carolina, USA. Geomorphology 126:108–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woodall C, Williams MS (2005) Sampling protocol, estimation, and analysis procedures for down woody materials indicator of the FIA program. General technical report NC-256, North Central Research Station. USDA-Forest Service, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang D, Hui D, Luo Y, Zhou G (2008) Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol 1:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew C. Ricker
    • 1
  • B. Graeme Lockaby
    • 2
  • Gavin D. Blosser
    • 3
  • William H. Conner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental, Geographical, and Geological SciencesBloomsburg University of PennsylvaniaBloomsburgUSA
  2. 2.School of Forestry and Wildlife SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  3. 3.Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest ScienceClemson UniversityGeorgetownUSA

Personalised recommendations