Biogeochemistry

, Volume 89, Issue 1, pp 7–25 | Cite as

Pools and fluxes of carbon in three Norway spruce ecosystems along a climatic gradient in Sweden

  • Dan Berggren Kleja
  • Magnus Svensson
  • Hooshang Majdi
  • Per-Erik Jansson
  • Ola Langvall
  • Bo Bergkvist
  • Maj-Britt Johansson
  • Per Weslien
  • Laimi Truusb
  • Anders Lindroth
  • Göran I. Ågren
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated analysis of organic carbon (C) pools in soils and vegetation, within-ecosystem fluxes and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in three 40-year old Norway spruce stands along a north-south climatic gradient in Sweden, measured 2001–2004. A process-orientated ecosystem model (CoupModel), previously parameterised on a regional dataset, was used for the analysis. Pools of soil organic carbon (SOC) and tree growth rates were highest at the southernmost site (1.6 and 2.0-fold, respectively). Tree litter production (litterfall and root litter) was also highest in the south, with about half coming from fine roots (<1 mm) at all sites. However, when the litter input from the forest floor vegetation was included, the difference in total litter input rate between the sites almost disappeared (190–233 g C m−2 year−1). We propose that a higher N deposition and N availability in the south result in a slower turnover of soil organic matter than in the north. This effect seems to overshadow the effect of temperature. At the southern site, 19% of the total litter input to the O horizon was leached to the mineral soil as dissolved organic carbon, while at the two northern sites the corresponding figure was approx. 9%. The CoupModel accurately described general C cycling behaviour in these ecosystems, reproducing the differences between north and south. The simulated changes in SOC pools during the measurement period were small, ranging from −8 g C m−2 year−1 in the north to +9 g C m−2 year−1 in the south. In contrast, NEE and tree growth measurements at the northernmost site suggest that the soil lost about 90 g C m−2 year−1.

Keywords

Soil carbon Boreal ecosystems Climatic gradient CoupModel Root litter Dissolved organic carbon 

References

  1. Ågren GI (2000) Temperature dependence of old soil organic matter. Ambio 29:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ågren GI, Hyvönen R (2003) Changes in carbon stores in Swedish forest soils due to increased biomass harvest and increased temperatures analysed with a semi-empirical model. For Ecol Manage 174:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ågren GI, Hyvönen R, Nilsson T (2007) Are Swedish forest soils sinks or sources for CO2 – model analyses based on forest inventory data. Biogeochemistry 82:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg B (2000) Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. For Ecol Manage 133:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg B, Ekbohm G, Johansson M-B, McClaugherty C, Rutigliano F, Virzo De Santo A (1996) Some foliar litter types have a maximum limit for decomposition – a synthesis of data from forest systems. Can J Bot 74:659–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg B, Johansson M-B, Tjarve I, Gaitnieks T, Rokjanis B, Beier C, Rothe A, Bolger T, Göttlein A, Gertsberger P (1999) Needle litterfall in a north European spruce forest transect. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Forest Soils, Reports in Forest Ecology and Forest Soils. Report 80, 54 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Berggren D, Bergkvist B, Johansson M-B, Langvall O, Majdi H, Melkerud P-A, Nilsson Å, Weslien P, Olsson M (2004) A Description of LUSTRAs Common Field Sites. Reports in Forest Ecology and Forest Soils. No 87. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. ISSN 0348-3398Google Scholar
  8. Bergh J, Linder S, Lundmark T, Elfving B (1999) The effect of water and nutrient availability on the productivity of Norway spruce in northern and southern Sweden. For Ecol Manage 119:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergh J, Freeman M, Sigurdsson B, Kellomäki S, Laitinen K, Niinistö S, Peltola H, Linder S (2003) Modelling the short-term effects of climatic change on the productivity of selected species in the Nordic countries. For Ecol Manage 183:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergh J, Linder S, Bergsgtröm J (2005) Potential production of Norway spruce in Sweden. For Ecol Manage 204:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callesen I, Liski J, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Olsson MT, Tau-Strand L, Vesterdal L, Westman CJ (2003) Soil carbon in Nordic well-drained forest soils – relationships with climate and texture class. Global Change Biol 9:358–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carriero MM, Sinsabaugh RL, Repert DA, Parkhurst DE (2000) Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology 81:2359–2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craine J, Tremmel D (1995) Improvements to the minirhizotron system. Bull Ecol Soc Am 76:234–235Google Scholar
  14. Eckersten H, Jansson P-E, Johnsson H (1998) SOILN model, ver. 9.2, User’s manual. Division of Hydrotechnics, Communications 98:6, Department of Soil Sciences, Swedish Agricultural University, Uppsala, 113 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Eliasson PE, McMurtrie RE, Pepper DA, Strömgren M, Linder S, Ågren GI (2005) The response of heterotrophic CO2 flux to soil warming. Global Change Biol 11:167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eusterhues K, Rumpel C, Kleber M, Kögel-Knabner I (2003) Stabilisation of soil organic matter by interactions with minerals as revealed by mineral dissolution and oxidative degradation. Org Geochem 34:1591–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang C, Smith P, Moncrieff JB, Smith JU (2005) Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature 433:57–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO (1990) FAO-Unesco soil map of the world. Revised legend. Soils bulletin 60, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Fröberg M, Berggren D, Bergkvist B, Bryant C, Mulder J (2006) Concentrations and fluxes of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in three Norway spruce stands along a climatic gradient in Sweden. Biogeochemistry 77:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaudinski JB, Trumbore SE, Davidson EA , Cook AC, Markewitz D, Richter DD (2001) The age of fine-root carbon in three forests of eastern United States measured by radiocarbon. Oecologia 129:420–429Google Scholar
  21. Giardina CP, Ryan MG (2000) Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature. Nature 404:858–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helmisaari H, Derome J, Nöjd P, Kukkola M (2007). Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands. Tree Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Högberg P, Nordgren A, Ågren GI (2002) Carbon allocation between tree root growth and root respiration in boreal pine forest. Oecologia 132:579–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jansson P-E, Halldin S (1979) Model for the annual water and heat flow in a layered soil. In: Halldin S (ed) Comparison of Forest and Energy Exchange Models. Int Soc For Ecol Model, Copenhagen, pp 145–163Google Scholar
  25. Jansson P-E, Karlberg L (2004) Coupled heat and mass transfer model for soil-plant-atmosphere systems. Royal Institute of Technology, Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering., Stockholm, Sweden, 435 pp (ftp://www.lwr.kth.se/CoupModel/ CoupModel.pdf)Google Scholar
  26. Johansson M-B, Grälls C (1989) Quantity, decomposition and nutrient dynamics in litterfall in some forest stands at Hålebäck, southern Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Forest Soils, Reports in Forest Ecology and Forest Soils, Report 62, 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Johansson M-B, Stendahl J, Eriksson E, Nilsson Å, Langvall O (2007) Tree species impact on soil organic carbon in Sweden. ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnsson H, Bergström L, Jansson P-E, Paustian K (1987) Simulated N dynamics and losses in a layered agricultural soil. Agric Ecosys Environ 18:333–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaiser K, Guggenberger G (2003) Mineral surfaces and soil organic matter. Eur J Soil Sci 54:219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalbitz K, Schmerwitz J, Schwesig D, Matzner E (2003) Biodegradation of soil-derived dissolved organic matter as related to its properties. Geoderma 113:273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karltun E (1995) Acidification of forest soils on glacial till in Sweden – soil chemical status and acidification processes in relation to environmental conditions. Report 4427. Swedish Environmental protection Agency. Solna, Sweden, 76 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Karltun E, Bain DC, Gustafsson J.P, Mannerkoski H, Murad E, Wagner U, Fraser AR, McHardy WJ, Starr M (2000) Surface reactivity of poorly-ordered minerals in podzol B horizons. Geoderma 265–288Google Scholar
  33. King AW, Post WM, Wullschleger SD (1997) The potential response of terrestrial carbon storage to changes in climate and atmospheric CO2. Climatic Change 35:199–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King JS, Albaugh TJ, Allen HL, Buford M, Strain BR, Dougherty P (2002) Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. New Phytol 154:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knorr W, Prentice IC, House JI, Holland EA (2005) Long-term sensitivity of soil organic carbon turnover to warming. Nature 433:298–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolari P, Pumpanen J, Kulmala L, Ilvesniemi H, Nikinmaa E, Grönholm T, Hari P (2006) Forest floor vegetation plays an important role in photosynthetic production of boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 221:241–248Google Scholar
  37. Lindroth A, Klemedtsson L, Grelle A, Weslien P, Langvall O (2007) Measurement of net ecosystem exchange, productivity and respiration in three spruce forests in Sweden shows unexpectedly large soil carbon losses. (this volume)Google Scholar
  38. Liski J, Westman CJ (1997) Carbon storage in forest soils of Finland. 1. Effect of thermoclimate. Biogeochemistry 36:239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luo Y (2003) Uncertainties in interpretation of isotope signals for estimation of fine root longevity: theoretical considerations. Global Change Biol 9:1118–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Majdi H (1996) Root sampling methods- applications and limitations of minirhizotron technique. Plant and Soil 185:225–258Google Scholar
  41. Majdi H, Andersson P (2005) Fine root production and turnover in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden: effects of nitrogen and water manipulation, Ecosystems 8:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Majdi H, Nylund J-EI, Ågren G (2007) Root respiration data and minirhizotron observations conflict with root turnover estimates from sequential soil coring (Scan. J. For. Res. (in press) Google Scholar
  43. Mälkönen E (1974) Annual primary production and nutrient cycle in some Scots pine stands. Commun Inst For Fenn 84:1–87Google Scholar
  44. Marklund LG (1988) Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden. Swed Univ Agri Sci Dept For Survey. Report 45, 73 pp [In Swedish with English summary]Google Scholar
  45. Matamala R, Gonzàlez-Meler MA, Jastrow JD, Norby RJ, Schlesinger WH (2003) Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestration potential. Science 21:1385–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Michalzik B, Kalbitz K, Park JH, Matzner E (2001) Fluxes and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen – a synthesis for temperate forests. Biogeochemistry 52:173–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Michalzik B, Tipping E, Mulder J, Gallardo Lancho JF, Matzner E, Bryant C, Clarke N, Lofts S, Vicente Esteban MA, (2003) Modelling the production and transport of dissolved organic carbon in forest soils. Biogeochemistry 66:241–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neff JC, Asner GP (2001) Dissolved organic carbon in terrestrial ecosystems: a synthesis and a model. Ecosystems 4:29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neff JC, Townsend AR, Gleixner G, Lehman SJ, Turnbull J, Bowman WD (2002) Variable effect of nitrogen additions on the stability and turnover of soil carbon. Nature 419:915–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Näsholm T, Ekblad A, Nordin A, Giesler R, Högberg M, Högberg P (1998) Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen. Nature 392:914–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Connell KEB, Gower ST, Norman JM (2003) Comparison of net primary production and light-use dynamics of two boreal black spruce forest communities. Ecosystems 6:236–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Olsson M, Erlandsson M, Nilsson T, Nilsson Å, Stendahl J (2007) Organic carbon in Swedish podsols and their relation to site factors.(this volume)Google Scholar
  53. Ostonen I, Lohmus K, Pajuste K (2005) Fine root biomass, production and its proportion of NPP in a fertile middle-aged Norway spruce forest: Comparison of soil core and ingrowth core methods. For Ecol Manage 212:264–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peltoniemi M, Mäkipää R, Liski J, Tamminen P (2004) Changes in soil carbon with stand age—an evaluation of a modeling method with empirical data. Global Change Biol 10:2078–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rasse DP, Rumpel C, Dignac M-F (2005) Is carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilization. Plant and Soil 269:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ratkowsky DA, Olley J, McMeekin Ta, Ball A (1982) Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. J Bacteriol 149:1–5Google Scholar
  57. Rühling Å, Tyler G (1970) Sorption and retention of heavy metals in the woodland moss Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) Br. et Sch. Oikos 21(1):92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwesig D, Kalbitz K, Matzner E (2003) Effects of aluminium on the mineralization rate of dissolved organic carbon derived from forest floors. Eur J Soil Sci 54:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simmons JA, Fernandez IJ, Briggs RD, Delaney MT (1996) Forest floor carbon pools and fluxes along a regional climate gradient in Maine, USA. For Ecol Manage 84:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skogsdata (2003) Aktuella uppgifter om de svenska skogarna från Riksskogstaxeringen. SLU, Inst. för skoglig resurshushållning och geomatik 114 pp [In Swedish]Google Scholar
  61. Svensson M, Jansson P-E, Berggren Kleja D (2007) Soil C in spruce forest ecosystems in Sweden – modelling current pools and trends using different assumptions on N supply. Manuscript (this volume)Google Scholar
  62. Tamminen P, Starr M (1994) Bulk density of forested mineral soils. Silva Fennica 28:53–60Google Scholar
  63. Tamm CO (1991) Nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems, questions of productivity, vegetational changes, and ecosystem stability. Ecol Stud 81, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 115 ppGoogle Scholar
  64. Tyler G, Gullstrand C, Holmquist K-E, Kjellstrand A-M (1973) Primary production and distribution of organic matter and metal elements in two heath ecosystems. J Ecol 61:251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo M, Lauber C (2004) Nitrogen deposition modifies soil carbon storage through changes in microbial enzyme activity. Ecol Appl 14:1172–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Viro PJ (1952) Kivisyyden Määrittämisestä (On the determination of stoniness.) Summary Comm Inst For Fenn 40:1–19Google Scholar
  67. Zech W, Guggenberger G (1996) Organic matter dynamics in forest soils of temperate and tropical ecosystems. In: Piccolo A (ed) Humic Substances in Terrestrial Ecosystems, pp 101–170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Berggren Kleja
    • 1
  • Magnus Svensson
    • 2
  • Hooshang Majdi
    • 3
  • Per-Erik Jansson
    • 2
  • Ola Langvall
    • 4
  • Bo Bergkvist
    • 5
  • Maj-Britt Johansson
    • 6
  • Per Weslien
    • 7
  • Laimi Truusb
    • 8
  • Anders Lindroth
    • 9
  • Göran I. Ågren
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Soil SciencesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Land and Water Resources EngineeringRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  4. 4.Asa Experimental Forest and Research StationSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesLammhultSweden
  5. 5.Department of EcologyUniversity of LundLundSweden
  6. 6.Department of Forest SoilsSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  7. 7.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesGöteborg UniversityGoteborgSweden
  8. 8.Institute of EcologyTallin UniversityTallinEstonia
  9. 9.Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem AnalysisLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations