Introduction

In the North Atlantic and the North Sea seasonal variations in marine phytoplankton composition are well known, but annual variations in abundance have hardly been described, with only a few exceptions. Monitoring has been maintained for several decades close to British (Russell et al. 1971), Dutch (Cadée and Hegeman 1991), German (Hickel et al. 1996) research institutes, off Belgium between 1988 and 2000 (Breton et al. 2006). Observed changes in plankton have been related to shifts in ocean current patterns (Russell 1935, 1973; Lindley et al. 1990; Taylor et al. 1998; Reid et al. 2003) that are assumed to be governed by large-scale meteorological phenomena (Beaugrand et al. 2002; Edwards et al. 2002; Reid and Edwards 2001; Drinkwater et al. 2003; Leterme et al. 2005; Breton et al. 2006), to climate (Radach 1984; Seuront and Souissi 2001; Reid et al. 1998), or to increased coastal eutrophication (Richardson 1989, 1997; Greve et al. 1996), but the response of plankton to anthropogenic interference (Cadée and Hegeman 2002; Beaugrand 2004) has not always been demonstrated in a convincing way.

The Continuous Plankton Recorder survey is the longest-running monitoring programme in the North Atlantic and the North Sea, with a remarkably wide coverage (Fig. 1a), based on one standard sampling method (Glover 1967; Colebrook 1975; Warner and Hays 1995). Since the time series spans several decades, it has been tempting to interpret striking changes in abundance of the plankton caught on the nets (‘silks’) of Hardy’s recorders as the consequence of long-term environmental change because variations often took place simultaneously over very large areas (Colebrook and Robinson 1964; Edwards et al. 2002). Actually, it has often been taken for granted that hydroclimatic forcing in relation to global warming must have controlled the long- and short-term plankton variability. The northward shift in subtropical and temperate zooplankton groups and the gradual disappearance of cold-adapted copepod species in the eastern North Atlantic (Beaugrand et al. 2002) has indeed been quite conspicuous. However, trends in ocean water temperature, in the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation, or in the state of the North Atlantic oscillation and related hydrographical features (e.g., vertical stratification: Martin and Hall 1975; Fromentin and Planque 1996, Reid et al. 2001) could often only be related to the abundance of plankton components and transitions in taxonomic composition after sophisticated statistical treatment (Beaugrand et al. 2000, 2003; Beaugrand 2004) or on assumptions involving differential lags in the response of ecosystem components (Drinkwater et al. 2003; Kane 2005).

Fig. 1
figure 1

(a) Standard areas of the continuous plankton recorder survey. (b)Distribution of Phaeocystis colonies over the North Atlantic and the North Sea over the years 1948–2003. Annual variations: see Fig. 2

The Continuous Plankton Recorder survey has provided a tremendous data set on the occurrence of Phaeocystis sp. Phaeocystis was already known to vary as much as any other group of plankton in the North Atlantic (Owens et al. 1989) and the North Sea, in a way apparently independent of the phytoplankton in general or of other microalgal species groups such as dinoflagellates and diatoms (Gieskes and Kraay 1977a), for reasons not known at the time. We present here an overview of the occurrence of Phaeocystis throughout the North Atlantic. In our discussion we will focus on its presence in the North Sea, where it is most abundant. We offer an attempt to link occurrence to the pattern of long-term change in hydrographic events in the eastern North Atlantic. We end the presentation of our analysis by highlighting the biogeochemical implications of the long-term changes in the abundance of this species, which is known to affect profoundly the cycling and sea-to-air exchange of climate-relevant elements, especially carbon and sulphur, components in the greenhouse gases CO2 and dimethyl sulphide (DMS; see review by Schoemann et al. 2005).

Materials and methods

The Continuous Plankton Recorder

The Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) survey consists of a dense network of transects across the North Atlantic and the North Sea. Plankton recorders are towed on a monthly basis at a depth of 8–10 m from ships-of-oppportunity that travel at 10–18 knots. The sampling mechanism inside the recorders consists of a narrow band of filtering silk (mesh 270 μm) that is driven by an impeller at the rear of the recorder at a speed adjusted according to the speed of the ship. The silk catches particles entering the 12 mm2 aperture while it passes (at a rate of 10 cm per 10 nautical miles, 18.5 km) through the end of a wide tunnel behind the narrow opening in front. About 3 m3 of seawater is filtered every 18.5 km. Clogging of silks is an exception, but it happens.

Phaeocystis colonies are recorded visually as present or absent on lengths of 10 cm of silk (a sample). From this information a time series from all the CPR samples for a given region can be used to create maps of the frequency of occurrence (the percentage of samples with Phaeocystis presence). 0% means that for a given month not a single sample contained Phaeocystis, 100% that it was present (no matter how much) in every single sample taken in that month. Each section covered by the CPR constitutes a variable number of samples. Total coverage of a section is determined as an average of all percentages.

Details of the sampling procedure have been described by Warner and Hays (1995). Total phytoplankton biomas’ is assessed in four categories by comparing the colouration of the silks (mostly caused by algal pigments) with a colour chart. The colour values [Phytoplankton Colour index (PCI)] are related to chlorophyll concentration on the silks and in the field (Gieskes and Kraay 1977a; Batten et al. 2003).

Standard regions of the CPR survey are shown in Fig. 1a; each consists of smaller rectangles; rectangle ‘Ow’, located in the southeastern part of the Southern Bight of the North Sea just off The Netherlands where major rivers of the continent (Rhine, Scheldt) discharge, has received particular attention in the present study.

Rijkswaterstaat-RIKZ survey

The chlorophyll concentrations of the monitoring programme run by Rijkswaterstaat-RIKZ off The Netherlands since the early 1970s and analysed here (Fig. 4) have been measured by fluorometry and later by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). These data, also those of Rhine river discharge, are available free of charge to the public on the internet because Rijkswaterstaat is a government agency funded by taxes; waterbase is the keyword for access. Briefly, samples are taken near the surface; they are considered to be representative for the whole water column because normally Dutch coastal waters are mixed from the surface to bottom by tides and wind. Information on the frequency of sampling, the station network, numbers of samples taken, and other details of the sampling procedure are implicit in the data set that can be extracted by using waterbase. We have chosen section Noordwijk (N) of this programme because it starts just north of the Rhine outflow and samples taken there are likely to be influenced most by this river. The numbers (N2, N10, etc.) refer to the number of kilometers from the coast.

Data presentation

The monthly mean phytoplankton and Phaeocystis plots presented here (months versus years, 1948–2003) are so-called Hovmöller diagrams, two-dimensional (2D) plots are often used to display large amounts of data in a readily understandable way (Hovmöller 1949); the computing and statistical analysis has been presented by Leterme et al. (2005). In order to reveal anomalies in the trends in the North Sea more clearly, the Phytoplankton Colour index (PCI) (chlorophyll) and Phaeocystis colony percent frequency-of-occurrence data were also standardized to zero mean and unit variance in the North Sea survey regions D1, D2, C1 and C2 together (refered to herein as ‘the North Sea’), the cumulative sums method (Ibañez et al. 1993). The calculation consists of subtracting a reference value (here the mean of the series) from the data. The residuals are then successively added, forming a cumulative function. Cumulative sum plots have been introduced into the SAHFOS data set interpretation (Beaugrand et al. 2000) to summarise major changes and identify transitional periods in phytoplankton time series. The cumulative function results in the smoothing of high-frequency interannual variability and highlights changes in mean values along the time series.

Results

The distribution of Phaeocystis colonies over the North Sea and the North Atlantic (Fig. 1b) seems to support the notion of an ocean-wide species with peak abundance in spring everywhere (Fig. 2). The centre of abundance over the study period, spanning five decades, was restricted nearly entirely to the North Sea, with the southeastern part clearly being a hotspot. In the open and central Atlantic regions the long record suggests low (cf. Owens et al. 1989) but persistent occurrence (Fig. 2). Abundance was also low (but equally persistent) in the northern North Sea (regions C1 and C2) where Atlantic water flows in from the northwest and dominates the water budget. Low colony frequencies were seen (only until 1985) in the front between the North Atlantic current in the Irminger Sea and the East Greenland current, south of Greenland (Figs. 1b and 2); the season of highest occurrence was spring also there.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hovmöller diagrams (years 1948–2003 versus months) of Phaeocystis frequency in different regions of the North Sea and the Atlantic Ocean (see Fig. 1b for the location of the regions). Rectangle ‘Ow’ is the southeastern part of the Southern Bight of the North Sea, directly off the Netherlands. South and West Greenland corresponds to the regions A8, B7 and B8 (see Fig. 1). Western Atlantic regrouped regions E9, E10 and F10. Central Atlantic corresponds to regions E5 to E8 and D5 to D8

Annual variation of Phaeocystis colony abundance did not at all resemble the variation in phytoplankton biomass [the chlorophyll-related Phytoplankton Colour index (PCI)] anywhere, certainly not in the bloom period, i.e. the spring (see Fig. 3). Year–month plots of true chlorophyll concentrations, derived from the Dutch monitoring programme, in CPR rectangle ‘Ow’ (see Fig. 1b) are presented in Fig. 4. Notice the gradually earlier chlorophyll spring bloom over the monitoring period at all stations (2, 10, 20 and 70 km off the coast of Noordwijk, The Netherlands).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Hovmöller diagrams (years 1948–2003 versus months) of the Phytoplankton Colour index (PCI) in the North Sea. For region location see Fig. 1b. Rectangle ‘Ow’ is the southeastern part of the Southern Bight of the North Sea, directly off The Netherlands

Fig. 4
figure 4

Hovmöller diagrams of chlorophyll-a concentration on a section perpendicular to the Dutch coast starting from the city of Noordwijk (just north of the river Rhine outflow), at 2, 10, 20 and 70 km from the coast. Notice the gradual shift of the start of the vegetative season to an earlier date at all four stations

The Phytoplankton Colour (PCI) cumulative sum plot showed a (single) shift (Fig. 5) in the mid 1980s. This was very different from the two shifts in the Phaeocystis plot (mid 1960s and early 1990s, see Fig. 5), which shows again that Phaeocystis does not reflect the variation observed in phytoplankton biomass. Between 1970 and 1985, low phytoplankton abundance (PCI) in the North Sea coincided with a late spring bloom. This pattern is in contrast with a high frequency of occurrence of Phaeocystis and its long season of presence before 1955. After 1995 the Phaeocystis season was again longer, an observation confirmed by Breton et al. (2006) who described the Phaeocystis record since 1988 off the Belgian coast, and by the Phaeocystis record of Philippart, Cadeé and van Iperen (not published) that covers the period 1975–2006.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Hovmöller diagrams, years 1948–2003 versus months of the year of: (A) standard deviations of the phytoplankton colour index (PCI), (B) standard deviations of Phaeocystis occurrence frequency, data averaged over North Sea regions C1, C2, D1 and D2 (cf. Fig. 1a). and (C) cumulative sum (see “Materials and methods” section) plots of mean phytoplankton colour index (PCI, in gray) and Phaeocystis frequency of occurrence (black) for the same region

Discussion

The distribution map of Phaeocystis presented here can hardly be improved, not even by ocean colour remote sensing: the frequent cloud cover over the North Atlantic hinders satellite-borne observations, but not the CPR survey. Also, the pigment signature of Phaeocystis is not very specific (Antajan et al. 2004) so the absorption spectrum and therewith the light reflectance hardly differs from that of other fucoxanthin- and fucoxanthin-derivative-containing phytoplankton groups, frustrating remote distinction of this particular species group. Without the survey it would not have been possible to construct the detailed year–month diagrams spanning many decades; those of low but persistent Phaeocystis occurrence in spring far offshore in the mid-Atlantic regions (Fig. 2) and in the Atlantic water of the northern North Sea, in areas C1 and C2 (Fig. 2) are probably the most unexpected. Not only in neritic water but apparently also in the open Atlantic, far away from anthropogenic nutrient sources (eutrophication), environmental conditions are clearly quite suitable for lifecycle development from single cells to colonies (the only stage recorded during the CPR survey).

Even so, changes in eutrophication have often been invoked to explain variation in Phaeocystis abundance and length of the season of blooming and occurrence, but this interpretation has not been satisfactory in view of the restricted number of stations, often limited to just one (Hickel et al. 1996; Cadée and Hegeman 2002). Breton et al. (2006), who also used observations at a single station (off Belgium), drew attention to the influence of larger-scale phenomena, namely the North Atlantic Oscillation that governs climate. Much earlier, an analysis of CPR survey results obtained in the same area had revealed trends of Phaeocystis (Gieskes and Kraay 1977a) that did not simply follow the eutrophication trend (Philippart et al. 2000): a decrease of Phaeocystis frequency of occurrence in the 1960s and early 1970s, a period when anthropogenic nutrient input in the southeastern North Sea increased.

The higher frequency of occurrence and longer growing season of Phaeocystis before 1965, when eutrophication was still quite low (Philippart et al. 2000), is particularly striking (Figs. 2, 5). Actually, colony abundance was already reported to be extensive more than 80 years ago (Savage 1930). This also suggests that Phaeocystis abundance is not determined by anthropogenic nutrient input only. On the other hand, phytoplankton biomass in general has always suggested a direct relation with eutrophication (Cadée and Hegeman 2002). Also in our study a relationship can be established between chlorophyll concentrations measured off the Dutch coast (Fig. 4) and river run-off (not shown), which confirms previous findings by Schaub and Gieskes (1991); recently Breton et al. (2006) have also pointed out this link. Increased nutrient availability of North Sea coastal waters after high freshwater fluxes following periods of heavy rainfall (a response to the North Atlantic Oscillation, cf. Breton et al. 2006) in the catchment area of the continent’s rivers clearly sets the stage for phytoplankton abundance in the southeastern North Sea. Such a batch culture-like response to nutrient enrichment (light is apparently not limiting primary production here) can be observed to the present day (Fig. 4). It can readily be explained by nutrient flushed out from the agricultural lands along the continent’s rivers, and probably also resuspension of nutrient-rich bottom sediment when river flow is rapid after heavy downpours upstream; Schaub and Gieskes (1991) stated that phytoplankton biomass near the Dutch coast can be predicted on the basis of meteorological data on precipitation, which has now also been suggested for Belgian coastal waters by Breton et al. (2006). There is a suggestion of a gradual shift of the start of the growing season to an earlier date in the southern North Sea (Fig. 4). Whether or not this is the consequence of a slight but gradual warming of southern North Sea waters remains to be shown.

The Phaeocystis component of the phytoplankton is not necessarily related to river-induced eutrophication: long-term changes of Phaeocystis are quite different from those of the phytoplankton (as Phytoplankton Colour index PCI, i.e. chlorophyl, in the “Materials and methods” section) in general (Fig. 5). As we have seen above, environmental conditions in open ocean water, not necessarily those of coastal waters, promote colony development from single cells. Atlantic water inflow into the North Sea may therefore well be an important factor for the development of Phaeocystis in the southern North Sea, a suggestion made earlier for phytoplankton in general by De Jonge et al. (1996) and De Jonge (1997). The inflow of Atlantic water into the North Sea through the Dover Straits has unfortunately never been monitored over longer periods; it has usually been no more than deduced, e.g. from the potential induced in submarine cables by the water flow (Prandle 1978), most often by constructing hydrodynamic models that simulate currents on the basis of tides, wind stress over the North Sea and freshwater input (Salomon et al. 1993; Laane et al. 1996; Skogen and Søiland 1998; Siegismund 2001). Rather sudden changes in climate–ocean interactions that influenced regime shifts in North Sea ecosystem components took place in the late 1970s, late 1980s and late 1990s (Weijerman et al. 2005). The long-term changes in Phaeocystis described here (Fig. 5) do not correspond well with these regime shift periods, probably because both variability in the mix of nutrient sources in the southern North Sea and in the sampling route of the plankton recorders do not allow corresponding biological and hydrographical observations.

Phaeocystis has been reported to accumulate preferentially far offshore, not on the coast, in the southern North Sea in the 1920s (Savage 1930). Later, Gieskes and Kraay (1977b) also described preferential abundance offshore. According to Brunet et al. (1996) accumulation on French beaches of the British Channel is the effect of eastward transport of offshore Phaeocystis blooms, not of in situ growth. The line of increased abundance off the southern coasts of Greenland, in the region of the front between the extension of the North Atlantic current in the Irminger Sea and the East Greenland current (Fig. 1b), may be explained in these terms. In view of the current system the Phaeocystis distribution here suggests advection from the Denmark Straits or even from the west coast of Iceland (regions not covered by the CPR survey), where Phaeocystis has been reported to be abundant (Thordardottir and Astthorsson 1986; Stefansson and Olafsson 1991). The total absence of colonies since 1985 can be explained simply (albeit speculatively) by assuming a shift in the front to an area outside the plankton recorder routes.

Offshore accumulation of Phaeocystis along frontal zones as suggested here may well be a more general phenomenon; in the southern North Sea it would explain an apparent dependence on the inflow of Channel/Atlantic water through the Dover Straits, a source of nutrients in this region that can be more important than local river sources of nutrients (Radach and Lenhart 1995; Laane et al. 1996; De Jonge et al. 1996; De Jonge 1997). The high Phaeocystis abundance far off the Netherlands, all the way between Holland and England in 1925 and 1926 (Savage 1930), can be understood in this light. The Atlantic Ocean water mass entering the North Sea from the southeast forms a front with the coastal water off the coasts of Belgium and the Netherlands. Interestingly, part of the decrease of Phaeocystis abundance in the CPR record in the 1960s and 1970s may be explained by a change of the position of the front, in line with the suggested front shift south of Greenland that may have brought Phaeocystis out of the reach of the CPR survey in that region. In the southeastern North Sea the sampling route of the CPR survey has remained the same geographically while the coastal water/ocean water front has shifted up to 20 km eastward to shallow Dutch coastal waters since the gradual man-made closure of the estuaries in the south-estern Netherlands following the catastrophic storm surge of 1953 (J. de Kok and L. Villerius, Rijkswaterstaat-RIKZ, pers. comm.).

Wind forcing may of course broaden the Rhine plume considerably, especially when winds from the east persist (Gieskes 1974). Wind forcing, later often suggested to be a dominant factor in setting the stage for water mass distribution and flow in the North Sea (Salomon et al. 1993; Laane et al. 1996; Smith et al. 1996; Pingree 2005), is a parameter with a long-term measurement record at many meteorological stations along the coasts. Exploitation of such data to hindcast and predict large-scale current patterns would enhance and improve existing models to estimate inflow of Atlantic Water through the Dover Straits. These models currently produce contradictory results, and no trend has so far been revealed (Otto et al. 1990). Low phytoplankton abundance in the North Sea and a late spring bloom and changes in other ecosystem components between the mid 1970s and the late 1980s have been ascribed to a cold-water period considered to be the consequence of low Atlantic water inflow into the North Sea (Corten and van de Kamp 1992, 1996; Lindeboom et al. 1995; Taylor et al. 1998; Edwards et al. 2002; Weijerman et al. 2005). It is well known that biological responses may magnify changes in the physical or chemical environment, and the annual variation of Phaeocystis colony occurrence in the southeastern North Sea may well be an example of this concept.

Phaeocystis plays a key role in element fluxes relevant to climate (reviewed by Schoemann et al. 2005) and therefore the results presented here have implications for biogeochemical models of cycling of carbon and sulphur. Sea-to-air exchange of carbon dioxide (CO2) and dimethyl sulphide (DMS) has been calculated on the basis of measurements made during cruises in a single year. Manizzi et al. (2005) already issued a warning to prevent this practice. Thomas et al. (2004) presented CO2 fluxes in the southern North Sea based on measurements from August 2001 to May 2002 only. They concluded that coastal seas would take up 0.4 Pg C per year. In view of the large annual variation both in phytoplankton and in Phaeocystis abundance presented in this paper such extrapolations cannot be correct. Discrepancies noted by Thomas et al. (2004) with results obtained in the same area by Borges and Frankignoulle (2003) may well have been the consequence of differences in plankton activity between the years in which the cruises were carried out.