Abstract
Even though aerobic methane-oxidation coupled to denitrification (AME-D) has been extensively studied, the exact estimation of CH4 utilization during this process still requires better understanding because effective utilization of CH4 is essential in denitrification performance, CH4 emission and economy. This study presents the effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) on CH4 utilization in an AME-D bioreactor. Stoichiometries for AME-D were newly established by using the energy balance and the thermodynamic electron equivalent model. The theoretically determined CH4 utilized/NO3− consumed (C/N) ratio from the stoichiometry was 2.0. However, the C/N ratios obtained from the experiment varied with increasing tendency as the HRT increased. Specifically, the C/N ratio increased from 1.38 to 2.85 when the HRT increased from 0.5 to 1.0 days, which placed the theoretical C/N ratio at the HRT between 0.5 and 1.0 days. The higher C/N ratio at the longer HRT was associated with a larger CH4 utilization by methanotrophs than denitrifiers. The results obtained in this study together with those obtained in previous studies clearly illustrated that a variety of conditions affect the utilization of CH4 which is essential for optimizing the AME-D process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alrashed W, Lee J, Park J, Rittmann BE, Tang Y, Neufeld JD, Lee HS (2018) Hypoxic methane oxidation coupled to denitrification in a membrane biofilm. Chem Eng J 348:745–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.202
AlSayed A, Fergala A, Khattab S, Eldyasti A (2018) Kinetics of type I methanotrophs mixed culture enriched from waste activated sludge. Biochem Eng J 132:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.01.003
Association American Public Health APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. APHA/AWWA/WEF, Washington
Benet RK, Steinberg LM, Chen W, Papoutsakis ET (2018) Engineering the bioconversion of methane and methanol to fuels and chemicals in native and synthetic methylotrophs. Curr Opin Biotechnol 50:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.11.010
Bouaifi M, Hebrard G, Bastoul D, Roustan M (2001) A comparative study of gas hold-up, bubble size, interfacial area and mass transfer coefficients in stirred gas–liquid reactors and bubble columns. Chem Eng Process 40:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(00)00129-X
Cao Q, Liu X, Ran Y, Li Z, Li D (2019) Methane oxidation coupled to denitrification under microaerobic and hypoxic conditions in leach bed bioreactors. Sci Total Environ 649:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.289
Chan ASK, Parkin TB (2000) Evaluation of potential inhibitors of methanogenesis and methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:11–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00071-7
Costa C, Dijkema C, Friedrich M, García-Encina P, Fernández-Polanco F, Stams AJM (2000) Denitrification with methane as electron donor in oxygen-limited bioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:754–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000337
Cuba RMF, Duarte ICD, Saavedra NK, Varesche MBA, Foresti E (2011) Denitrification coupled with methane anoxic oxidation and microbial community involved identification. Braz Arch Biol Techn 54(1):173–182. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132011000100022
Daelman MRJ, Van Eynde T, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Volcke EIP (2014) Effect of process design and operating parameters on aerobic methane oxidation in municipal WWTPs. Water Res 66(1):308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.034
Eisentraeger A, Klag P, Vansbotter B, Heymann E, Dott W (2001) Denitrification of groundwater with methane as sole hydrogen donor. Water Res 35(9):2261–2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00516-9
Houbron E, Torrijos M, Capdeville B (1999) An alternative use of biogas applied at the water denitrification. Water Sci Technol 40(8):115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00616-2
Kits KD, Klotz MG, Stein LY (2015) Methane oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction under hypoxia by the Gammaproteobacterium Methylomonas denitrificans sp. Nov. type strain FJG1. Env Microb 17(9):3219–3232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12772
Lee HJ, Bae JH, Cho KM (2001) Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in a mixed methanotrophic culture. Biotechnol Lett 23(12):935–941. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010566616907
Lee JW, Lee KH, Park KY, Maeng SK (2010) Hydrogenotrophic denitrification in a packed bed reactor: effects of hydrogen-to-water flow rate ratio. Bioresour Technol 101(11):3940–3946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.022
Lee KH, Choi OK, Song JH, Lee JW (2014) Membrane diffuser coupled bioreactor for methanotrophic denitrification under non-aerated condition: suggestion as a post-denitrification option. Environ Eng Res 19(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2014.19.1.075
Luo JH, Chen H, Yuan Z, Guo J (2018) Methane supported nitrate removal from groundwater in a membrane biofilm reactor. Water Res 132:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.064
McCarthy PL (2007) Thermodynamic electron equivalents model for bacterial yield prediction: modifications and comparative evaluations. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(2):377–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21250
Modin O, Fukushi K, Yamamoto K (2007) Denitrification with methane as external carbon source. Water Res 41(12):2726–2738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.053
Modin O, Fukushi K, Nakajima F, Yamamoto K (2008) Performance of a membrane biofilm reactor for denitrification with methane. Bioresour Technol 99(2):8054–8060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.042
Modin O, Fukushi K, Nakajima F, Yamamoto K (2010) Aerobic methane oxidation coupled to denitrification: kinetics and effect of oxygen supply. J Environ Eng-ASCE 136(2):211–219. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000134
Pelaz L, Gomez A, Letona A, Garralon G, Fdz-Polanco M (2018) Nitrogen removal in domestic wastewater. Effect of nitrate recycling and COD/N ratio. Chemosphere 212:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.052
Sánchez A, Rodríguez-Hernández L, Buntner D, Esteban-García A, Tejero I, Garrido JM (2016) Denitrification coupled with methane oxidation in a membrane bioreactor after methanogenic pre-treatment of wastewater. J Chem Technol Biot 91:2950–2958. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4913
Srinandan CS, Shah M, Patel B, Nerurkar AS (2011) Assessment of denitrifying bacterial composition in activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 102(20):9481–9489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.094
Sun FY, Dong WY, Shao MF, Lv XM, Li J, Peng LY, Wang HJ (2013) Aerobic methane oxidation coupled to denitrification in a membrane biofilm reactor: treatment performance and the effect of oxygen ventilation. Bioresour Technol 145:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.115
Templeton AS, Chu KH, Alvarez-Cohen L, Conrad ME (2006) Variable carbon isotope fractionation expressed by aerobic CH4-oxidizing bacteria. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70(7):1739–1752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.12.002
Thalasso F, Vallecillo A, García-Encina P, Polanco FFDZ (1997) The use of methane as a sole carbon source for wastewater denitrification. Water Res 31(1):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00228-X
Werner M, Kayser R (1991) Denitrification with biogas as external carbon source. Water Sci Technol 23(4–6):701–708. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1991.0520
Xin J-Y, Cui J-R, Niu J-Z, Hua S-F, Xia C-G, Li S-B, Zhu L-M (2004) Production of methanol from methane by methanotrophic bacteria. Biocatal Biotransform 22(3):225–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242420412331283305
Zhu J, Wang Q, Yuan M, Tan GYA, Sun F, Wang C, Wu W, Lee PH (2016) Microbiology and potential applications of aerobic methane oxidation coupled to denitrification (AME-D) process: a review. Water Res 90:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.020
Zhu J, Xu X, Yuan M, Wu H, Ma Z, Wu W (2017) Optimum O2: CH4 ratio promotes the synergy between aerobic methanotrophs and denitrifiers to enhance nitrogen removal. Front Microbiol 8:1112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01112
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from Korea University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, K., Choi, O.K., Kim, Y. et al. Methane utilization in aerobic methane oxidation coupled to denitrification (AME-D): theoretical estimation and effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT). Biodegradation 30, 101–112 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-019-09869-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-019-09869-8