Biodegradation

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 39–50 | Cite as

Bench-scale biodegradation tests to assess natural attenuation potential of 1,4-dioxane at three sites in California

  • Mengyan Li
  • E. Tess Van Orden
  • David J. DeVries
  • Zhong Xiong
  • Rob Hinchee
  • Pedro J. Alvarez
Original Paper

Abstract

1,4-Dioxane (dioxane) is relatively recalcitrant to biodegradation, and its physicochemical properties preclude effective removal from contaminated groundwater by volatilization or adsorption. Through this microcosm study, we assessed the biodegradation potential of dioxane for three sites in California. Groundwater and sediment samples were collected at various locations at each site, including the presumed source zone, middle and leading edge of the plume. A total of 16 monitoring wells were sampled to prepare the microcosms. Biodegradation of dioxane was observed in 12 of 16 microcosms mimicking natural attenuation within 28 weeks. Rates varied from as high as 3,449 ± 459 µg/L/week in source-zone microcosms to a low of 0.3 ± 0.1 µg/L/week in microcosms with trace level of dioxane (<10 µg/L as initial concentration). The microcosms were spiked with 14C-labeled dioxane to assess the fate of dioxane. Biological oxidizer-liquid scintillation analysis of bound residue infers that 14C-dioxane was assimilated into cell material only in microcosms exhibiting significant dioxane biodegradation. Mineralization was also observed per 14CO2 recovery (up to 44 % of the amount degraded in 28 weeks of incubation). Degradation and mineralization activity significantly decreased with increasing distance from the contaminant source area (p < 0.05), possibly due to less acclimation. Furthermore, both respiked and repeated microcosms prepared with source-zone samples from Site 1 confirmed relatively rapid dioxane degradation (i.e., 100 % removal by 20 weeks). These results show that indigenous microorganisms capable of degrading dioxane are present at these three sites, and suggest that monitored natural attenuation should be considered as a remedial response.

Keywords

1,4-Dioxane Natural attenuation Bioremediation Mineralization Microcosms 

References

  1. Aelion CM, Dobbins DC, Pfaender FK (1989) Adaptation of aquifer microbial communities to the biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds—influence of substrate concentration and preexposure. Environ Toxicol Chem 8(1):75–86. doi:10.1897/1552-8618(1989)8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez PJ, Illman WA (2006) Bioremediation and natural attenuation: process fundamentals and mathematical models. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson RH, Anderson JK, Bower PA (2012) Co-occurrence of 1,4-dioxane with trichloroethylene in chlorinated solvent groundwater plumes at US Air Force installations: fact or fiction. Integr Environ Assess Manag 8(4):731–737. doi:10.1002/ieam.1306 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreozzi R, Caprio V, Insola A, Marotta R (1999) Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for water purification and recovery. Catal Today 53(1):51–59. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00102-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckles DM, Chen W, Hughes JB (2007) Bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons sequestered in sediment: microbial study and model prediction. Environ Toxicol Chem 26(5):878–883. doi:10.1897/06-410R.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brode J, Fotouhi F, Kolon S (2005) Ultraviolet and hydrogen peroxide treatment removes 1,4-dioxane from multiple aquifers. Technology News and Trends. http://www.clu-in.org/products/newsltrs/tnandt/view.cfm?issue=0105.cfm. Accessed 27 Sept 2014
  7. Chiang SYD, Mora R, Diguiseppi WH, Davis G, Sublette K, Gedalanga P, Mahendra S (2012) Characterizing the intrinsic bioremediation potential of 1,4-dioxane and trichloroethene using innovative environmental diagnostic tools. J Environ Monit 14(9):2317–2326. doi:10.1039/C2em30358b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronk G (2008) Case study comparison of multiple activation methods for sodium persulfate ISCO treatment. In: Sixth international conference on remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds, Monterey. Battelle Press, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  9. DiGuiseppi W, Whitesides C (2007) Treatment options for remediation of 1,4-dioxane in groundwater. Environ Eng Appl Res Pract 2:1–7Google Scholar
  10. Dombrowski PM, Weir BA, Kelly KM, Brown J (2010) Fast-track remedial design of full-scale ISCO application using pilot scale testing and field screening parameters. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference on soils, sediments, water and energy, 2010Google Scholar
  11. Doucette WJ, Wheeler BR, Chard JK, Bugbee B, Naylor CG, Carbone JP, Sims RC (2005) Uptake of nonylphenol and nonylphenol ethoxylates by crested wheatgrass. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(11):2965–2972. doi:10.1897/05-171r.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epa US (2006) treatment technologies for 1,4-dioxane: fundamentals and field applications. EPA, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  13. EPA US (2010) http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0326.htm. Accessed 27 Sept 2014
  14. EPA US (2013) The third unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR 3): data summary. EPA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Houston KS, Horst J, Wroblewski G (2009) Focused in-situ chemical oxidation of chlorinated VOCs and 1,4-dioxane using sodium persulfate in fine-grained soils. Pollution Engineering. http://www.pollutionengineering.com/articles/88033. Accessed 27 Sept 2014
  16. Huling SG, Pivetz BE (2006) In-situ chemical oxidation. Washington DC, EPAGoogle Scholar
  17. IARC (1999) Monograph on 1,4-Dioxane. International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim YH, Engesser KH, Kim SJ (2007) Physiological, numerical and molecular characterization of alkyl ether-utilizing rhodococci. Environ Microbiol 9(6):1497–1510. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01269.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leahy JG, Colwell RR (1990) Microbial-degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiol Rev 54(3):305–315PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Li D, Fortner JD, Johnson DR, Chen C, Li QL, Alvarez PJJ (2010a) Bioaccumulation of C-14(60) by the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environ Sci Technol 44(23):9170–9175. doi:10.1021/Es1024405 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Fiorenza S, Chatham JR, Mahendra S, Alvarez PJJ (2010b) 1,4-Dioxane biodegradation at low temperatures in Arctic groundwater samples. Water Res 44(9):2894–2900. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li M, Conlon P, Fiorenza S, Vitale RJ, Alvarez PJJ (2011) Rapid analysis of 1,4-dioxane in groundwater by frozen micro-extraction with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Ground Water Monit R 31(4):70–76. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2011.01350.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li M, Mathieu J, Liu Y, Van Orden ET, Yang Y, Fiorenza S, Alvarez PJJ (2013a) The abundance of tetrahydrofuran/dioxane monooxygenase genes (thmA/dxmA) and 1,4-dioxane degradation activity are significantly correlated at various impacted aquifers. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1(1):122–127. doi:10.1021/ez400176h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li M, Mathieu J, Yang Y, Fiorenza S, Deng Y, He Z, Zhou J, Alvarez PJJ (2013b) Widespread distribution of soluble di-iron monooxygenase (SDIMO) genes in arctic groundwater impacted by 1,4-dioxane. Environ Sci Technol 47(17):9950–9958. doi:10.1021/es402228x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macdonald JA (2000) Peer reviewed: evaluating natural attenuation for groundwater cleanup. Environ Sci Technol 34(15):346A–353A. doi:10.1021/es003359w PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mahendra S, Alvarez-Cohen L (2006) Kinetics of 1,4-dioxane biodegradation by monooxygenase-expressing bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 40(17):5435–5442. doi:10.1021/Es060714v PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahendra S, Petzold CJ, Baidoo EE, Keasling JD, Alvarez-Cohen L (2007) Identification of the intermediates of in vivo oxidation of 1,4-dioxane by monooxygenase-containing bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 41(21):7330–7336. doi:10.1021/Es0705745 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller CM, Valentine RL, Roehl ME, Alvarez PJJ (1996) Chemical and microbiological assessment of pendimethalin-contaminated soil after treatment with Fenton’s reagent. Water Res 30(11):2579–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohr T, Stickney J, DiGuiseppi W (2010) Environmental investigation and remediation: 1,4-dioxane and other solvent stabilizers. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parales RE, Adamus JE, White N, May HD (1994) Degradation of 1,4-dioxane by an Actinomycete in pure culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 60(12):4527–4530PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sales CM, Grostern A, Parales JV, Parales RE, Alvarez-Cohen L (2013) Oxidation of the cyclic ethers 1,4-dioxane and tetrahydrofuran by a monooxygenase in two Pseudonocardia species. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(24):7702–7708. doi:10.1128/Aem.02418-13 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwarzenbach R, Gschwend P, Imboden D (2003) Environmental organic chemistry. WileyGoogle Scholar
  33. Sei K, Kakinoki T, Inoue D, Soda S, Fujita M, Ike M (2010) Evaluation of the biodegradation potential of 1,4-dioxane in river, soil and activated sludge samples. Biodegradation 21(4):585–591. doi:10.1007/s10532-010-9326-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thiemer B, Andreesen JR, Schrader T (2003) Cloning and characterization of a gene cluster involved in tetrahydrofuran degradation in Pseudonocardia sp strain K1. Arch Microbiol 179(4):266–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vainberg S, McClay K, Masuda H, Root D, Condee C, Zylstra GJ, Steffan RJ (2006) Biodegradation of ether pollutants by Pseudonocardia sp strain ENV478. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(8):5218–5224PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang HY, Ye QF, Yue L, Yu ZY, Han AL, Yang ZM, Lu L (2009) Kinetics of extractable residue, bound residue and mineralization of a novel herbicide, ZJ0273, in aerobic soils. Chemosphere 76(8):1036–1040. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.051 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang Y, Li M, Michels C, Moreira-Soares H, Alvarez PJ (2014) Differential sensitivity of nitrifying bacteria to silver nanoparticles in activated sludge. Environ Toxicol Chem. doi:10.1002/etc.2678 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mengyan Li
    • 1
  • E. Tess Van Orden
    • 1
  • David J. DeVries
    • 2
  • Zhong Xiong
    • 2
  • Rob Hinchee
    • 3
  • Pedro J. Alvarez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, Inc.IrvineUSA
  3. 3.Integrated Science & Technology, Inc.PanaceaUSA

Personalised recommendations