Abstract
A field study was carried out to monitor the effect of application of molasses based distillery effluent on yields of sugarcane and soil properties. The treatments consisted of main plots: control (I0), first pre-sowing irrigation with undiluted effluent (I1), one irrigation with effluent: tube-well water (1:3) at tillering stage (I2), two irrigations with effluent: tube-well water (1:4) at tillering and 30 d after tillering stage (I3). The subplots either received no fertilizer application (F0) or had 50 % of recommended dose (50 kg N, 60 kg P2O5 and 40 kg K2O ha−1 as basal dose (F1) with top dressing of 50 kg N ha−1 at tillering and in June before the onset of monsoon. Nitrogen to the ratoon crops was applied in three equal splits. Application of 50 % recommended fertilizer dose increased the cumulative cane yields under different effluent treatments. Use of distillery effluent irrespective of the method of application significantly increased the cumulative yields of sugarcane over no application of effluent significantly at p ≤ 0.05. After the harvest of second ratoon crop, no significant effect of different treatments was noted on soil pH, electrical conductance and exchangeable Na. Significantly higher build-up of organic C in surface soil was noted under I2 treatment in comparison to I0 treatment at p ≤ 0.05. With no fertilizer application, both I1 and I2 significantly increased accumulation of alkaline KMnO4 hydrolysable N in 30–45 cm layer in comparison to I0F0 at p ≤ 0.05. In comparison to I0, use of I2 increased the content of Olsen’s P significantly (p ≤ 0.05) in 30–45 and 45–60 cm layers while I3 increased it significantly at p ≤ 0.05 in 0–15 and 45–60 cm layers. Use of distillery effluent as pre-sowing or standing crop irrigation increased ammonium acetate extractable K in surface and sub-surface layers significantly in comparison to I0 at p ≤ 0.05. Thus, use of distillery effluent in sugarcane crop as pre-sown or standing crop irrigation had no adverse impact on soil reaction or electrical conductivity and could save at least fifty percent of basal NPK application with significantly higher cumulative millable cane yields of main crop and two subsequent ratoons.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biswas AK, Mohanty M, Hati KM, Misra AK (2009) Distillery effluents effect on soil organic carbon and aggregate stability of a Vertisol in India. Soil Tillage Res 104:241–246
Cochran WG, Cox GM (1959) Experimental Designs. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York
Gopal H, Kayalvizhi C, Baskar M, Subash Chandra Bose M, Sivanandham M (2001) Effect of distillery effluent on changes in soil properties, microbial population, yield and quality of sugarcane in sandy soils. In: Proc 63rd annual convention of the sugar technologists’ association of India, Jaipur, India, 25–27 Aug 2001 pp C52–C58
Hati KM, Biswas AK, Badyopadhyay KK, Misra AK (2007) Soil properties and crop yields on a vertisol in India with application of distillery effluent. Soil Tillage Res 92:60–68
Joshi HC (1999) Bio-energy potential of distillery effluent. Bio Energy News 3:10–15
Joshi HC, Pathak H, Chaudhary A, Kalra N (1996) Distillery effluent as a source of plant nutrients: prospects and problems. Fert News 41:41–47
Kumar V, Wati L, FitzGibbon F, Nigan P, Banat IM, Singh D, Marchant R (1997) Bioremediation and decolorization of anaerobically digested distillery spent wash. Biotechnol Lett 19:311–313
Mahimairaja S, Bolan NS (2004) Problems and prospects of agricultural use of distillery spentwash in India. 3rd Australian New Zealand Soils Conference, University of Sydney, Australia 5–9 Dec 2004 Published on CDROM. Website www.regional.org.au/au/asssi/
Morlat R, Chaussod R (2008) Long-term additions of organic amendments in a Loire Valley vineyard I. Effects on properties of a calcareous sandy soil. Am J Enol Vitic 59:353–363
Page AL, Miller RH, Kenney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis-Part 2 (ed) No. 9 Agronomy Series ASA-SSSA Publisher, Madison
Pandey RA, Malhotra A, Tankhiwale S, Pande S, Pathe PP, Kaul SN (2003) Treatment of biologically treated distillery effluent—a case study. Int J Environ Study 60:263–275
Pathak H, Joshi HC, Chaudhary A, Kalra N, Dwivedi MK (1999) Soil amendment with distillery effluent for wheat and rice cultivation. Water Air Soil Pollut 113:133–140
Ramana S, Biswas AK, Singh AB, Yadava RBR (2002) Relative efficacy of different distillery effluents on growth, nitrogen fixation and yield of groundnut. Biores Technol 81:117–121
Spencer GL, Meade GP (1955) Cane sugar handbook. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York
Subash Chandra Bose M, Gopal H, Basker M, Kavalizhi C, Sivanandham M (2002) Utilization of distillery effluent in coastal sandy soil to improve soil fertility and yield of sugarcane. In: 17th World Congress of Soil Science, 14–21 August 2002, Thailand p 1980
Suganya K, Rajannan G (2009) Effect of onetime post-sown and pre-sown application of distillery spentwash on the growth and yield of maize crop. Bot Res Intl 2:288–294
Tewari PK, Batra VS, Balakrishnan M (2007) Water management initiatives in sugarcane molasses based distilleries in India. Res Conserv Recycl. 52:351–367
Uppal J (2004) Water utilization and effluent treatment in the Indian alcohol industry-an-overview. In: Liquid Assests, Proceedings Indo-EU workshop on promoting efficient water use in agro-based industries. TERI Press, new Delhi, pp 13–19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, P.C., Singh, R.K., Srivastava, P. et al. Utilization of molasses based distillery effluent for fertigation of sugarcane. Biodegradation 23, 897–905 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-012-9582-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-012-9582-5