, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 593–601 | Cite as

Rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil using the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Gordonia sp. S2RP-17

  • Sun Hwa Hong
  • HeeWook Ryu
  • Jaisoo KimEmail author
  • Kyung-Suk ChoEmail author
Original Paper


A plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) was isolated and identified as Gordonia sp. S2RP-17, which showed ACC deaminase and siderophore synthesizing activities. Its maximum specific growth rate was 0.54 ± 0.12 d−1 at 5,000 mg L−1 of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH), and its maximum diesel degradation rate was 2,434.0 ± 124.4 mg L−1 d−1 at 20,000 mg L−1 of TPH. The growth of Zea mays was significantly promoted by the inoculation of Gordonia sp. S2RP-17 in the diesel-contaminated soil. Measured TPH removal efficiencies by various means were 13% by natural attenuation, 84.5% by planting Zea mays, and 95.8% by the combination of Zea mays and Gordonia sp. S2RP-17. The S2RP-17 cell counts were maintained at 1 × 106 CFU g-soil−1 during the remediation period, although they slightly decreased from their initial numbers (2.94 × 107 CFU g-soil−1). These results indicate that rhizoremediation using both Zea mays and Gordonia sp. S2RP-17 is a promising strategy for enhancing remediation efficiency of diesel-contaminated soils.


Rhizoremediation Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Diesel-contaminated soil Gordonia sp. Zea mays 



This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (NRL program, R0A-2008-000-20044-0). It was also supported through the Advanced Environmental Biotechnology Research Center at Pohang University of Science and Technology (2009-0079504) and the Basic Research Program (R01-2005-000-10268-0) by the NRF, MEST.


  1. Arshad M, Saleem M, Hussain S (2007) Perspectives of bacterial ACC deaminase in phytoremediation. Trends Biotechnol 25:356–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deikman J (1997) Molecular mechanism of ethylene regulation of gene transcription. Plant Physiol 100:561–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dell’Amico E, Cavalca L, Andreoni V (2005) Analysis of rhizobacterial communities in perennial Graminaceae from polluted water meadow soil, and screening of metal-resistant, potentially plant growth-promoting bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 52:153–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Etsuko K, Tsukasa M, Shyoji M, Masahiko T (2006) Ryegrass enhancement of biodegradation in diesel-contaminated soil. Environ Exp Bot 55:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Franzetti A, Bestetti G, Caredda P, Colla LP, Tamburini E (2008) Surface-active compounds and their role in the access to hydrocarbons in Gordonia strains. Microbiol Ecol 63:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerhardt KE, Huang XD, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2009) Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: potential and challenges. Plant Sci 176:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glick BR (2003) Phytoremediation: synergistic use of plants and bacteria to clean up the environment. Biotechnol Adv 21:383–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Golubev SN, Schelud’ko AV, Muratova AY, Makarov OE, Turkovskaya OV (2009) Assessing the potential of rhizobacteria to survive under phenanthrene pollution. Water Air Soil Pollut 198:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gunther T, Dornberger U, Fritsche W (1996) Effects of ryegrass on biodegradation of hydrocarbons in soil. Chemosphere 33:203–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hong JH, Kim JS, Choi OK, Cho KS, Ryu HW (2005) Characterization of a diesel-degrading bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa IU5, isolated from oil-contaminated soil in Korea. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:381–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hristova KR, Lutenegger CM, Scow KM (2001) Detection and quantification of methyl tert-butyl ether-degrading strain PM1 by real-time TaqMan PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5154–5160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang XD, Yousef A, Jolanta G, Bernard GR, Bruce GM (2005) A multi-process phytoremediation system for decontamination of persistent total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) from soil. Microchem J 81:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson DL, Maguire KL, Anderson DR, McGrath SP (2004) Enhanced dissipation of chrysene in planted soil: the impact of a rhizobial inoculum. Soil Boil Biochem 36:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson DL, Anderson DR, McGrath SP (2005) Soil microbial response during the phytoremediation of a PAH contaminated soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37:2334–2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joo CS, Oh YS, Chung WJ (2001) Evaluation of bioremediation effectiveness by resolving rate-limiting parameters in diesel-contaminated soil. J Microbiol Biotechnol 11:607–613Google Scholar
  16. Kim J, Kang SH, Min KA, Cho KS, Lee IS (2006) Rhizosphere microbial activity during phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. J Environ Sci Health Part A–Toxic/Hazard Subst Environ Eng 41:2503–2516Google Scholar
  17. Kim J, Min KA, Cho KS, Lee IS (2007) Enhanced bioremediation and modified bacterial community structure by barnyard grass in diesel-contaminated soil. Environ Eng Res 12:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koo SY, Cho KS (2009) Isolation and characterization of a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Serratia sp. SY5. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:1431–1438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee EH, Cho KS, Ryu HW (2009) Application of quantitative real-time PCR for quantification of Rhodococcus sp. EH831 in a polyurethane biofilter. J Environ Biol 30:155–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin X, Li X, Li P, Li F, Zhang L, Zhou Q (2008) Evaluation of plant-microorganism synergy for their remediation of diesel fuel contaminated soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 81:19–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liste H, Felgentreu D (2006) Crop growth, culturable bacteria, and degradation of petrol hydrocarbons (PHCs) in a long-term contaminated field soil. Appl Soil Ecol 31:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu L, Li XW, Liu SJ, Liu ZP (2007) Isolation and identification of a PAHs-degrading strain Gordonia sp. He4 and its dynamics during bioremediation of phenanthrene polluted soil. Huan Jing Ke Xue 28:617–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Macek T, Mackova M, Kas J (2000) Exploitation of plants for the removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotechnol Adv 18:23–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin-Laurent F, Philippot L, Hallet S, Chaussod R, Germon JC, Soulas G, Catroux G (2001) DNA extraction from soils: old bias for new microbial diversity analysis methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2354–2359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNicoll DM, Baweja AS (1995) Bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils: an innovative, environmentally friendly technology. Technical Report, The National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program, Environment Canada, Ottawa, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  26. Nehl DB, Allen SJ, Brown JF (1996) Deleterious rhizosphere bacteria an intergrating perspective (review). Appl Soil Ecol 5:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman LA, Reynolds CM (2004) Phytodegradation of organic compounds. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmroth MRT, Pichtel J, Puhkka J (2002) Phytoremediation of subarctic soil contaminated with diesel fuel. Bioresour Technol 84:221–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pepper IL, Gerba CP, Brendecke JW (1995) Environmental microbiology: a laboratory manual. Academic Press Inc., New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Rahman KSM, Thahira-Rahman J, Lakshmanaperumalsamy P, Banat IM (2002) Towards efficient crude oil degradation by a mixed bacterial consortium. Bioresour Technol 85:257–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryu HW, Joo JH, An YJ, Cho KS (2006) Isolation and characterization of psychrotrophic and halotolerant Rhodococcus sp. YHLT-2. J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:605–612Google Scholar
  32. Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderphores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siciliano SD, Germida JJ (1997) Bacterial inoculants of forage grasses that enhance degradation of 2-chlorobenzoic acid in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1098–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tesar M, Reichenauer TG, Sessitsch A (2002) Bacterial rhizosphere populations of black poplar and herbal plants to be used for phytoremediation of diesel fuel. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1883–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Toshitomi KJ, Shann JR (2001) Corn (Zea mays) root exudates and their impact on 14C-pyrene mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1769–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weyens N, van der Lelie D, Safiyh T, Vangronsveld J (2009) Phytoremediation: plant-endophyte partnerships take the challenge. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:248–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wongsa P, Tanaka M, Ueno A, Hasanuzzaman M, Yumoto I (2004) Isolation and characterization of novel strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens possessing high efficiency to degrade gasoline, kerosene, diesel oil, and lubricating oil. Curr Microbiol 49:415–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhuang X, Chen J, Shim H, Bai Z (2007) New advances in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for bioremediation. Environ Int 33:406–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringEwha Womans UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringSoongsil UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Life ScienceKyonggi UniversitySuwon, Gyeonggi-doKorea

Personalised recommendations