Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative study of the nitrification characteristics of two different nitrifier immobilization methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodegradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research investigated the nitrification characteristics of two different immobilization methods: nitrifier encapsulation in polyethylene glycol (PEG) gel pellets and nitrifier biofilm attachment on elastic plastic filler. The two carriers were placed in identical reactors. They reached a maximum nitrification rate of 39 and 25 mgN/L·h 30 days after start-up. The results showed that the nitrification efficiency in the PEG reactor was higher than in the biofilm reactor under the same conditions. Variations in temperature decreased the nitrification rate by approximately 55% in the PEG reactor from 28 to 8°C, while 74.2% in the biofilm reactor. When the COD loading rate was increased to 0.8 kg/m3 day, the nitrification efficiency in the biofilm reactor dropped sharply to 23%, and that of PEG reactor remained over 80%. PEG pellets with a high nitrification rate under all conditions showed promise as an immobilization medium, and are likely to be utilized in the nitrification of high-strength ammonia and COD wastewater during long-term operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeling U, Seyfried CF (1992) Anaerobic–aerobic treatment of high-strength ammonium wastewater nitrogen removal. Water Sci Technol 26(3):1007–1015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anthonisen AC, Loehr RC, Prakasam TBS, Srinath EG (1976) Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J Water Pollut Control Fed 48(5):835–852

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antonina M, Sakairi C, Yasuda K, Matsumura M (1996) Nitrogen removal in seawater using nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria immobilized in porous cellulose carrier. Water Sci Technol 34(7–8):267–274

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Publishers Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Asano H, Myoga H, Asano M, Toyao M (1992) A study of nitrification utilizing whole micro-organisms immobilized by the PVA-freezing method. Water Sci Technol 26(3):1037–1046

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bock E, Koops HP, Harns H (1986) Cell biology of nitrifying bacteria. In: Prosser JI (ed) Nitrification. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 17–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindle K, Stephenson T (1996) Nitrification in a bubbleless oxygen mass transfer membrane bioreactor. Water Sci Technol 34(9):261–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao GM, Zhao QX, Sun XB, Zhang T (2002) Characterization of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria coimmobilized in PVA and kinetics model of biological nitrogen removal by coimmobilized cells. Enzyme Microb Technol 30(1):49–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SL, Ling J, Blancheton JP (2006a) Nitrification kinetics of biofilm as affected by water quality factors. Aquac Eng 34:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZQ, Wen QX, Wang JL, Li F (2006b) Simultaneous removal of carbon and nitrogen from municipal-type synthetic wastewater using net-like rotating biological contactor (NRBC). Process Biochem 41(12):2468–2472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto N, Sumino T (1998) Wastewater treatment using activated sludge entrapped in polyethylene glycol prepolymer. J Ferment Bioeng 86(4):424–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isaka K, Yoshie S, Sumino T, Inamori Y, Tsuneda S (2007) Nitrification of landfill leachate using immobilized nitrifying bacteria at low temperatures. Biochem Eng J 37(1):49–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamstra A, Van der Heul JW, Nijhof M (1998) Performance and optimization of trickling filters on eel farms. Aquac Eng 17:175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SK, Kong I, Lee BH, Kang L, Lee MG, Suh KH (2000) Removal of ammonium-N from a recirculation aquacultural system using an immobilized nitrifier. Aquac Eng 21:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenen EJTM, dos Santos VAP, Grolle KCF, Tramper J, Wijffels RH (1996) Characteristics of and selection criteria for support materials for cell immobilization in wastewater treatment. Water Res 30(12):2985–2996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leenen EJTM, van Boxtel AMGA, Englund G, Tramper J, Wijffels RH (1997) Reduced temperature sensitivity of immobilized Nitrobacter agilis cells caused by diffusion limitation. Enzyme Microb Technol 20(8):573–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ling J, Chen SL (2005) Impact of organic carbon on nitrification performance of different biofilters. Aquac Eng 33:150–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Montràs A, Pyke B, Boon N, Gòdia M, Mergeay M, Hendrickx L, Pérez J (2008) Distribution of Nitrosomonas europaea and Nitrobacter winogradskyi in an autotrophic biofilm reactor as depicted by molecular analyses and mathematical modelling. Water Res 42:1700–1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morita M, Kudo N, Uemoto H, Watanabe A, Shinozaki H (2007) Protective effect of immobilized ammonia oxidizers and phenol-degrading bacteria on nitrification in ammonia- and phenol containing wastewater. Eng Life Sci 7:587–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pruden A, Sedran M, Suidan M, Venosa A (2003) Biodegradation of MTBE and BTEX in an aerobic fluidized bed reactor. Water Sci Technol 47(9):123–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao XL, Zhang ZJ, Chen QX, Chen YJ (2008) Nitrification characteristics of PEG immobilized activated sludge at high ammonia and COD loading rates. Desalination 222:340–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rittmann BE, McCarty PL (2001) Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 470

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostron WM, Stuckey DC, Young AA (2001) Nitrification of high strength ammonia wastewaters: comparative study of immobilisation media. Water Res 35(5):1169–1178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rother E, Cornel P, Ante A, Kleinert P, Brambach R (2002) Comparison of combined and separated biological aerated filter (BAF) performance for pre-denitrifcation/nitrification of municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 46(4–5):149–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka K, Nakao M, Mori N, Emori H, Sumino T, Nakamura Y (1994) Application of immobilized nitrifiers gel to removal of high ammonium nitrogen. Water Sci Technol 29(9):241–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Ginkel CG, KChAM Luyben, Klapwijk A (1983) Characterisation of Nitrosomonas europaea immobilised in calcium alginate. Enzyme Microb Technol 5(4):297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang RC, Wen XH, Qian Y (2005) Influence of carrier concentration on the performance and microbial characteristics of a suspended carrier biofilm reactor. Process Biochem 40(9):2992–3001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesman U (1994) Biological nitrogen removal from wastewater. In: Fiechter A (ed) Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, vol 51. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu SM, Chen SL (2002) The impact of temperature on nitrification rate in fixed film biofilters. Aquac Eng 26:221–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Hitachi Plant Engineering and Construction Co., Ltd for supplying the PEG pellets and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhirong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Z., Zhang, Z., Li, J. et al. Comparative study of the nitrification characteristics of two different nitrifier immobilization methods. Biodegradation 20, 859–865 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-009-9273-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-009-9273-z

Keywords

Navigation