Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An assessment of the implementation of the EU policy for conservation varieties from 2009 to 2023 and its relationship to Geographical Indications

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the EU policy for conservation varieties has a history of more than a decade, there is little relevant academic literature. Geographical Indications (GIs) have an important role to play in preserving plant varieties. This paper assesses the implementation of the EU policy for conservation varieties from 2009 to 2023 and examines the relationship between conservation varieties and GIs. Data from the Common Catalogue of Varieties and the e-ambrosia database are used. According to the findings of the study, although the number of conservation varieties keeps increasing, it remains marginal when compared to the total number of varieties found in the Common Catalogue of Varieties. Different types of maintainers exist while the registration fee and the interpretation of the notion of region of origin differ among EU Member States. As far as GIs are concerned, few use conservation varieties as enforceable rules. However, as both GIs and conservation varieties increase in numbers their relationship will strengthen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  • Batten L, Plana Casado MJ, van Zeben J (2021) Decoding seed quality: a comparative analysis of seed marketing law in the EU and the United States. Agronomy 11:2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocci R (2009) Seed legislation and agrobiodiversity: conservation varieties. J Agric Environ Int Dev 103(1/2):31–49. https://doi.org/10.12895/jaeid.20091/2.23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocci R, Chable V, Kastler G, Louwaars N (2012) Farm seed opportunities, recommendations for on-farm conservation in Europe. In: Maxted N, Dulloo ME, Ford-Lloyd BV, Frese L, Iriondo J, Pinheiro de Carvalho MAA (eds) Agrobiodiversity conservation. Securing the diversity of crop wild relatives and landraces. CABI, Oxfordshire, p 137–141

  • Commission Directive (2008) 2008/62/EC of 20 June 2008 providing for certain derogations for acceptance of agricultural landraces and varieties which are naturally adapted to the local and regional conditions and threatened by genetic erosion and for marketing of seed and seed potatoes of those landraces and varieties. OJ L 162(06):13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Directive 2009/145/EC of 26 (2009) November 2009 providing for certain derogations, for acceptance of vegetable landraces and varieties which have been traditionally grown in particular localities and regions and are threatened by genetic erosion and of vegetable varieties with no intrinsic value for commercial crop production but developed for growing under particular conditions and for marketing of seed of those landraces and varieties. OJ L 312(11):44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Plant Variety Office (2021) Guidelines on variety denominations with explanatory notes on article 63 of Council Regulation (EC) 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights. Community Plant Variety Office

  • Consulting VVA, International A, Wageningen UR, CBS-KNAW BLE-IBV (2016) Preparatory action on EU plant and animal genetic resources. Final report. European Union

  • Delphine M-V (2008) From plant variety definition to geographical indication protection: a search for the link between Basmati rice and India/Pakistan. J World Intellect Prop. 11(4):321–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00341.x

  • European Economic and Social Committee (2022) Opinion on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/787 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, European Economic and Social Committee

  • European Commission (2023b) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of plant reproductive material in the Union, amending Regulations (EU) 2016/2031, 2017/625 and 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 2002/53/EC, 2002/54/EC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC, 2002/57/EC, 2008/72/EC and 2008/90/EC (Regulation on plant reproductive material). Document COM: 2023:414:FIN, European Commission

  • European Commission (2023a) Commission staff working document. Impact assessment report accompanying the documents Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of plant reproductive material in the Union, amending Regulations (EU) 2016/2031, 2017/625 and 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 2002/53/EC, 2002/54/EC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC, 2002/57/EC, 2008/72/EC and 2008/90 (Regulation on plant reproductive material) and Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of forest reproductive material in the Union, amending Regulations (EU) 2016/2031 and 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Council Directive 1999/105/EC (Regulation on forest reproductive material), European Commission

  • European Commission, Haines R, Smith E, Kantor EV (2023) Study supporting the impact assessment of the revision of the plant and forest reproductive material legislation: final report. Publications Office of the European Union

  • European Commission (2013) A fitness check of the food chain: state of play and next steps. Commission Staff Working Document, European Commission

  • European Commission (2017) Summary report of the Standing Committee on plants, animals, food and feed. European Commission, DG Health and Food Safety

  • European Commission (2020a) EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. European Commission

  • European Commission (2020b) Farm to fork strategy for a fair healthy and environmentally –friendly food system. European Commission

  • European Commission (2021) Study on the Union’s options to update the existing legislation on the production and marketing of plant reproductive material. Commission Staff Working Document, European Commission

  • European Commission, Ecorys, Metis, Agrosynergy (2023) Mapping and analysis of CAP strategic plans. Assessment of joint efforts for 2023–2027. European Commission

  • ICF (2021) Data gathering and analysis to support a Commission study on the Union’s options to update the existing legislation on the production and marketing of plant reproductive material. DG for Health and Food Safety, European Commission

  • Kastler G, Moy A-C (2013) The European Union Directive on conservation varieties and its incompatibility with on-farm management of plant genetic resources. In: de Boef WS, Subedi A, Peroni N, Thijssen M, O’Keeffe E (eds) Community Biodiversity Management. Promoting resilience and the conservation of plant genetic resources. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson Guerra J (2010) Geographical indications, in situ conservation and traditional knowledge, vol 3. ISTSD Policy Brief

  • Lorenzetti F, Negri V (2009) The European seed legislation on conservation varieties. In Vetelainen, M., Negri, V., Maxted, N. (eds) European landraces: on-farm conservation, management and use. Biodiversity technical bulletin No 15, Rome, Italy: 287–295

  • Raggi L, Caproni L, Negri V (2021) Landrace added value and accessibility in Europe: what a collection of case studies tells us. Biodivers Conserv 30:1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02130-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raggi L, Pacicco LC, Caproni L, Alvarez-Muniz C, Annamaa K, Barata AM, Batir-Rusu. D, Diez MJ, Heinonen M, Holubec V, Kell S, Kutnjak H, Maierhofer H, Poulsen G, Prohens J, Ralli P, Rocha F, Rubio Teso ML, Sandru D, Santamaria P, Sensen S, Shoemark O, Soler S, Strajeru S, Thormann I, Weibull J, Maxted N, Negri V (2022) Analysis of landrace cultivation in Europe: a means to support in situ conservation of crop diversity. Biol Conserv 267:109460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamaria P, Ronchi L (2016) Varietà Da conservazione in Italia: lo stato dell’arte per le specie orticole. Italus Hortus 23(2):29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Santamaria P, Signore A (2021) How has the consistency of the common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species changed in the last ten years? Sci Hortic 277(5):109805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spataro G, Negri V (2013) The European seed legislation on conservation varieties: focus, implementation, present and future impact on landrace on farm conservation. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:2421–2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-0009-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakoufaris H, Gocci A (2023) Geographical indications and sustainable development: an assessment of four categories of products from the fruit and vegetable sector of the EU. Food Rev Int 39(9):7112–7125. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2022.2143519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winge T (2015) Seed legislation in Europe and crop genetic diversity. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 1–64

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Anne Burchett for providing valuable feedback and editing.

Funding

Not available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Directorate of Agricultural Economy and Veterinary of Imathia, Gorgopotamou 7, Veria, GR-59132, Greece

    Hristos Vakoufaris

Authors
  1. Hristos Vakoufaris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.V. wrote the manuscript text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hristos Vakoufaris.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniel Sanchez Mata.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vakoufaris, H. An assessment of the implementation of the EU policy for conservation varieties from 2009 to 2023 and its relationship to Geographical Indications. Biodivers Conserv (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02930-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02930-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation