Abstract
The effects of land-use change on biodiversity can be idiosyncratic, varying not only across taxa and land-use type, but also between different levels and dimensions of diversity. Using a species-level phylogeny and morphological traits to build a functional dendrogram, we compared the phylogenetic and functional diversity and the trait composition of ant communities in five habitats (Forest, Savanna, Tree plantations, Pastures, and Soy fields), representing a gradient of land-use intensity in Brazil´s Cerrado. Results shown that ant communities in the most intensive land-use type (soy fields) presented the most distinct morphological trait composition. Furthermore, communities in the soy fields presented significantly lower levels of functional and phylogenetic alpha diversity as compared to the forest and savanna communities. There was evidence of functional and phylogenetic clustering in the soy field communities and of functional clustering in the pasture communities, whereas those in the remaining land uses presented a random functional and phylogenetic structure. In addition, we found evidence of biotic homogenization in the soy field communities, as the dissimilarity in the functional and phylogenetic composition between soy field sites was significantly smaller than the dissimilarity between forest or savanna sites. These results suggest that intensification of land use in the Cerrado affects multiple dimensions of ant diversity. The species found in the soy fields represented a nested subset of those found in most of the remaining land uses, and this has potential implications for the delivery of ant services to soybean farmers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1103400. DNA sequences, in FASTQ format, are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject ID: PRJNA927311).
References
Agavekar G, Agashe D, Economo EP (2019) Dimensions of ant diversity on a small tropical island. Ins Conserv Divers 12:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12326
Almeida RPS, Teresa FB, Camarota F, Izzo TJ, Silva RR, Andrade-Silva J, Arruda FV (2023) The role of morphological traits in predicting the functional ecology of arboreal and ground ants in the Cerrado-Amazon transition. Oecol 201:199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05304-7
Andersen NA, Vasconcelos HL (2022) Historical biogeography shapes functional ecology: inter-continental contrasts in responses of savanna ant communities to stress and disturbance. J Biogeogr 49:590–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14343
Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x
Borges FJA, de Siqueira Fortunato D, Loyola R (2021) Critical areas for retaining multiple dimensions of bird diversity in the Cerrado. Journ Nat Conserv 64:126079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126079
Brown WL (2000) Diversity of ants. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution, pp 45–79
Cadotte MW, Cardinale BJ, Oakley TH (2008) Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc Nat Acad Scien 105:17012–17017. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.080596210
Cadotte MW, Dinnage R, Tilman D (2012) Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability. Ecol 93:S223–S233. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0426.1
Carvalho RL, Vieira J, Melo C, Silva AM, Tolentino VC, Neves K, Vasconcelos HL (2022) Interactions between land use, taxonomic group and aspects and levels of diversity in a Brazilian savanna: implications for the use of bioindicators. J Appl Ecol 59:2642–2653. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14270
Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x
Chapman PM, Tobias JA, Edwards DP, Davies RG (2018) Contrasting impacts of land-use change on phylogenetic and functional diversity of tropical forest birds. J Appl Ecol 55:1604–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13073
Coyle JR, Halliday FW, Lopez BE, Palmquist KA, Wilfahrt PA, Hurlbert AH (2014) Using trait and phylogenetic diversity to evaluate the generality of the stress-dominance hypothesis in eastern north American tree communities. Ecography 37:814–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00473
De la Mora A, García-Ballinas JA, Philpott S (2015) Local, landscape, and diversity drivers of predation services provided by ants in a coffee landscape in Chiapas, Mexico. Agricul Ecosyst Environ 201:8391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.006
Del Toro I, Ribbons RR, Pelini SL (2012) The little things that run the world revisited: a review of ant mediated services and disservices. Myrm News 17:133–146
Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3
Feeley KJ, Silman MR (2010) Land-use and climate change effects on population size and extinction risk of Andean plants. Glob Chan Biol 16:3215–3222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02197.x
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Sci 309:570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
Frizzo TLM, Vasconcelos HL (2013) The role of scattered trees for ant conservation in an agriculturally dominated neotropical landscape. Biotropica 45:644–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12045
Gaëlle L, Loiseau N, Gaertner JC, Poggiale JC, Gaertner-Mazouni N (2020) Assessing functional diversity: the influence of the number of the functional traits. Theor Ecol 13:117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-019-00433
Gibb H, Parr CL (2013) Does structural complexity determine the morphology of assemblages? An experimental test on three continents. PLoS ONE 8:e64005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064005
Gibb H, Stoklosa J, Warton D, Brown A, Andrew N, Cunningham S (2015) Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages? Oecologia 177:519–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3101-9
Gossner MM, Lewinsohn TM, Kahl T, Grassein F, Boch S, Prati D, Allan E (2016) Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities. Nat 540:266–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20575
Graham SI, Kinnaird MF, O’Brien TG, Vagen T, Winowiecki LA, Young T, Young HS (2019) Effects of land-use change on community diversity and composition are highly variable among functional groups. Ecol Appl 29:e01973. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1973
Harmange C, Santos CC, Roque FO, Souza FL, Arvor D, Bonnet M, Vieira EM, Pays O (2023) The pivotal role of land cover around forest fragments for small-mammal communities in a neotropical savanna. Conserv Sci Pract 5:e13005. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13005
Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinform 26:1463–1464. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166
Kusuma YWC, Rembold K, Tjitrosoedirdjo SS, Kreft H (2018) Tropical rainforest conversion and land use intensification reduce understorey plant phylogenetic diversity. Journ Appl Ecol 55:2216–2226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13201
Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B (2014) FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0-12.1
Laste KCD, Durigan G, Andersen AN (2019) Biodiversity responses to land-use and restoration in a global biodiversity hotspot: ant assemblages in Brazilian Cerrado. Aust Ecol 44:313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12676
Lepš J, de Bello F (2023) Differences in trait–environment relationships: implications for community weighted means tests. J Ecol 111:2328–2341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14172
Machado AF, da Silva RJ, de Albuquerque Correa CM, da Silva RDSA, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Pereira MJB, Storck-Tonon D (2023) Severe simplification of the structure of dung beetle assemblages in neotropical soybean croplands regardless of the native vegetation domain. Agricul Ecosyst Environ 357:108654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108654
Maciel R, Braga RF, Carvalho RL, Louzada J, Slade EM (2023) Tropical savanna conversion to exotic pastures negatively affects taxonomic and functional diversity of dung beetle assemblages, but not dung removal. Ins Conserv Divers 16:588–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12656
Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K (2022) cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. R package version 2.1.4
Martello F, de Bello F, Morini M (2018) Homogenization and impoverishment of taxonomic and functional diversity of ants in Eucalyptus plantations. Sci Rep 8:3266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20823-1
McCune B, Mefford MJ (2018) PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 7.08
McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Tren Ecol Evol 14:450–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679
Monge O, Dullinger S, Fusani L, Schulze CH (2022) Taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic bird diversity response to coffee farming intensity along an elevational gradient in Costa Rica. Agric Ecosyst Environ 326:107801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107801
Neves K, Santos B, Schultz T, Gotzek D, Abreu RC, Durigan G, Vasconcelos HL (2023) Woody encroachment affects multiple dimensions of ant diversity in a neotropical savanna. Ins Conserv Div 16:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad12633
Newbold T, Scharlemann JPW, Butchart SHM, Sekercioglu CH, Alkemade R, Booth H, Purves DW (2012) Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sc 280:20122131–20122131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2131
Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Purvis A (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nat 520:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324
Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
Oliveira-Filho T, Ratter JA (2002) Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado biome. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (eds) The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University, New York, pp 91–120
Pacheco R, Camacho GP, Frizzo TL, Vasconcelos HL (2017) Effects of land-use changes on ecosystem services: decrease in ant predation in human‐dominated landscapes in central Brazil. Ent Experim Applic 162:302–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12542
Paradis E, Schliep K (2019) Ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses. R Bioinform 35:526–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633
Parente L, Nogueira S, Baumann L, Almeida C, Maurano L, Affonso AG, Ferreira L (2021) Quality assessment of the PRODES Cerrado deforestation data. Remot Sens Appl Soc Environ 21:100444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100444
Parr CL, Eggleton P, Davies AB, Evans TA, Holdsworth S (2016) Suppression of savanna ants alters invertebrate composition and influences key ecosystem processes. Ecol 97:1611–1617. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1713.1
Parr CL, Dunn RR, Sanders NJ, Weiser MD, Photakis M, Bishop TR, Fitzpatrick MC, Arnan X, Baccaro F, Brandão CRF, Chick L, Donoso DA, Fayle TM, Gómez C, Grossman B, Munyai TC, Pacheco R, Retana J, Robinson A, Sagata K, Silva RR, Tista M, Vasconcelos HL, Yates M, Gibb H (2017) GlobalAnts: a new database on the geography of ant traits (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ins Conserv Div 10:5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12211
Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758. https://https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x
Powers RP, Jetz W (2019) Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios. Nat Clim Chang 9:323–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0406-z
Prado-Júnior JA, Maravalhas JB, Tosta THA, Augusto SC, Araújo BB, Rosa TF, Vasconcelos HL (2020) Spatio-temporal changes in the structure of the ant, bee, and tree communities in the Brazilian cerrado. Oecol Aust 24:448–460. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2020.2402.15
Prevedello JA, Almeida-Gomes M, Lindenmayer DB (2018) The importance of scattered trees for biodiversity conservation: a global meta‐analysis. J Appl Ecol 55:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12943
Przybyszewski KR, Vicente RE, Ferreira JVA, Pereira MJB, Izzo TJ, Storck-Tonon D (2022) Legal reserves ensure alpha and beta ant diversity in highly modified agricultural landscapes. PECON 20:330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2022.08.001
Rabello AM, Parr CL, Queiroz ACM, Braga DL, Santiago GS, Ribas CR (2021) Taxonomic and functional approaches reveal different responses of ant assemblages to land-use changes. Bas Appl Ecol 54:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.04.001
Rausch LL, Gibbs HK, Schelly I, Brandão A Jr, Morton DC, Filho AC, Meyer D (2019) Soy expansion in Brazil’s Cerrado. Conserv Lett 12:e12671. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12671
Rurangwa ML, Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Matthews TJ, Niyigaba P, Wayman JP, Tobias JA, Whittaker RJ (2021) Effects of land‐use change on avian taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity in a tropical montane rainforest. Div Distrib 27:1732–1746. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13364
Salas-Lopez A, Violle C, Mallia L, Orivel J (2017) Land-use change effects on the taxonomic and morphological trait composition of ant communities in French Guiana. Ins Conserv Diver 11:162–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12248
Song XP, Hansen MC, Potapov P, Adusei B, Pickering J, Adami M, LimaA, Zalles V, Stehman SV, Di Bella CM, Conde MC, Copati EJ, Fernandes LB, Hernandez-Serna A, Jantz SM, Pickens AH, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A (2021) Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation. Nat Sustain 4:784–792. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00729-z
Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielborger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x
Tucker CM, Cadotte MW, Carvalho SB, Davies TJ, Ferrier S, Fritz SA, Grenyer R, Helmus MR, Jin LS, Mooers AO, Pavoine S, Purschke O, Redding DW, Rosauer DF, Winter M, Mazel F (2017) A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol Rev 92:698–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12252
Webb CO (2000) Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat 156:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1086/303378
Weideman EA, Slingsby JA, Thomson RL, Coetzee BTW (2019) Land cover change homogenizes functional and phylogenetic diversity within and among African savanna bird assemblages. Land Ecol 1:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00939-z
Wilker I, Lasmar CJ, Schmidt FA, Costa MMS, Almeida DDF, Dutra DBDS, Alves AL, Silva LL, Ribas CR (2023) Land-use change in the Amazon decreases ant diversity but increases ant‐mediated predation. Ins Conserv Div 16:379–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12632
Yates M, Andrew NR (2010) Comparison of ant community composition across different land-use types: assessing morphological traits with more common methods. Aust Journ Entom 50:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.2010.00795.x
Acknowledgements
We thank the Brazilian Council for Research and Scientific Development (CNPq grants 441225/2016-0 and 441142/2020-6 to H.L.V), and the Foundation for Research Support of the Minas Gerais State (Fapemig, APQ 04815-17 and 03372-21) for funding this research. R.L.C is currently supported by a FAPESP researcher fellowships (grants 2022/07381-9 and 2023/07920-0).
Funding
We thank the Brazilian Council for Research and Scientific Development (CNPq grants 441225/2016-0 and 441142/2020-6 to H.L.V), and the Foundation for Research Support of the Minas Gerais State (Fapemig, APQ 04815-17 and 03372-21) for funding this research. R.L.C is currently supported by a FAPESP researcher fellowships (grants 2022/07381-9 and 2023/07920-0).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Funding acquisition by HLV. Field work and data collection and preparation were performed by JV and RLC, data analysis by KCN, JV and HLV, taxonomic identification by JV and KCN, figure preparation by KCN. HLV wrote the first version and all authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Communicated by Jens Dauber.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Vasconcelos, H.L., Neves, K.C., Vieira, J. et al. Land use intensification has extensive effects on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of neotropical ant communities. Biodivers Conserv (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02866-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02866-1