Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Chiu WT, Ho YS (2021) Bibliometrics of latin american research on COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic: the main trends. Revista de Biología Tropical 69(4):1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v69i4.48189
Escudero A, Iriondo JM, Torres ME (2003) Spatial analysis of genetic diversity as a tool for plant conservation. Biol Conserv 113(3):351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00122-8
Fu HZ, Ho YS (2015) Top cited articles in thermodynamic research. J Eng Thermophys 24(1):68–85. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1810232815010075
Fu HZ, Wang MH, Ho YS (2012) The most frequently cited adsorption research articles in the science citation index (expanded). J Coll Interfac Sci 379(1):148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.04.051
Ho YS (2019a) Managerial areas of construction and demolition waste: A scientometric review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health,15, 2350. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101837
Ho YS (2019b) Comments on the reply to the Rebuttal to: Zhu, Jin, & He ‘On evolutionary economic geography: A literature review using bibliometric analysis’, European Planning Studies, vol. 27, pp 639–660. Eur Plan Stud 27:1241–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1613037
Montalvo AM, Williams SL, Rice KJ, Buchmann SL, Cory C, Handel SN, Nabhan GP, Primack R, Robichaux RH (1997) Restoration biology: a population biology perspective. Restor Ecol 5(4):277–290. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00542.x
Somoza-Fernández M, Rodríguez-Gairín JM, Urbano C (2018) Journal coverage of the emerging sources citation index. Learn Publ 31:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1160
Xu J, Xiao PN, Li TT, Wang ZX (2022) Research progress on endangered plants: a bibliometric analysis. Biodivers Conserv 31(4):1125–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02392-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y-SH: Writing—reviewing and editing; M-HW: Writing—reviewing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Daniel Sanchez Mata.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, YS., Wang, MH. Rebuttal to: Xu et al. (2022) ‘Research progress on endangered plants: A bibliometric analysis’, Biodivers. Conserv. vol. 31, pp 1125–1147. Biodivers Conserv 32, 4525–4527 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02714-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02714-8