Abstract
The development of road infrastructures causes the loss and fragmentation of natural habitats, structurally, due to the landscape reconfiguration, and functionally, due to the noise of vehicular traffic, in animals that communicate through sounds. We quantify the degree of disturbance in roads with different vehicular traffic intensity and to evaluate the choice of reproductive sites by anuran species. Between 2018 and 2020, 13 ponds associated to roads with medium-low (RP-30) and high levels of vehicular traffic (NR-A005) were sampled. For each site were surveyed variables of pond and surrounding habitat and records of ambient noise, characterized spectrally and temporally. The presence of anuran species and their relative abundance were measured. Significant differences were found between roads in all noise variables, being greater in the RN-A005, except for the average entropy that was higher for the RP-30. The specific richness and the average relative abundance were higher in the RP30 sites, which generally presented significantly lower noise levels; lower urbanization, more vegetated roadsides; greater distances and steep slopes from the roadway, reducing the spread of noise; presence, mainly, of rural environments on both roadsides contributing low additional levels of anthropic noise. Our results show that the structure of the noise profile and the degree to which noise is spread and perceived in the reproductive sites of anurans, depends on a set of variables specific to each habitat that should be considered when conducting studies that evaluate the responses of individuals to this type of contamination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arzabe C, Prado C (2006) Distinct architectures of subterranean nests in the genus Leptodactylus of the fuscus group (Anura, Leptodactylidae).Herpetol Rev23–26
Babini MS, Salas NE, Bionda C, Martino AL (2015) Implicaciones de la urbanización en la presencia, distribución y ecología reproductiva de la fauna de anuros de una ciudad del área central de Argentina. Rev Mex Biodivers 86:188–195. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.43684
Beebee TJ (2013) Effects of road mortality and mitigation measures on amphibian populations. Conserv Biol 27:657–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12063
Bee MA, Swanson EM (2007) Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise. Anim Behav 74:1765–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.019
Bionda C, Salas N, di Tada I (2006) Variación bioacústica en poblaciones de Physalaemus biligonigerus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) en Córdoba, Argentina. Rev Herpetol Esp 20:95–104.
Bionda C, Salas N, Caraffa E, Baraquet M, Martino A (2012) On abnormalities recorded in an urban population of Rhinella arenarum from central Argentina. Herpetol Notes 5:237–241
Boarman WI, Sazaki M (2006) A highway’s road-effect zone for desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii). J Arid Environ 65:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.06.020
Carr LW, Fahrig L (2001) Effect of road traffic on two amphibian species of differing vagility. Conserv Biol 15:1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041071.x
Castellano S, Giacoma C (1998) Stabilizing and directional female choice for male calls in the european green toad. Anim Behav 56:275–287. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0784
Charif RA, Waack AM, Strickman LM (2010) Raven Pro 1.4 User’s Manual. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Coffin AW (2007) From roadkill to road ecology: a review of the ecological effects of roads. J Transp Geogr 15:396–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.006
Cosentino BJ, Marsh DM, Jones KS et al (2014) Citizen science reveals widespread negative effects of roads on amphibian distributions. Biol Conserv 180:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.027
Couto AP, Ferreira E, Torres RT, Fonseca C (2017) Local and landscape drivers of pond-breeding amphibian diversity at the northern edge of the Mediterranean. Herpetologica 73:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-16-00020.1
Cunnington GM, Fahrig L (2010) Plasticity in the vocalizations of anurans in response to traffic noise. Acta Oecol 36:463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2010.06.002
Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.031
Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2017) InfoStat versión. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina
Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2009) Quantifying the road-effect zone: threshold effects of a motorway on anuran populations in Ontario, Canada. Ecol Soc 14
Fahrig L, Pedlar JH, Pope SE, Taylor PD, Wegner JF (1995) Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biol Conserv 73:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00102-V
Forman RT, Deblinger RD (2000) The ecological road-effect zone of a Massachusetts (USA) suburban highway. Conserv Biol 14:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99088.x
Francis CD, Barber JR (2013) A framework for understanding noise impacts on wildlife: an urgent conservation priority. Front Ecol Environ 11:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1890/120183
Gallardo JM (1974) Anfibios de los alrededores de Buenos Aires. EUDEBA, Buenos Aires
Geneletti D (2003) Biodiversity impact assessment of roads: an approach based on ecosystem rarity. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:343–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00099-9
Goodwin SH, Shriver WG (2011) Effects of traffic noise on occupancy patterns of forest birds. Conserv Biol 25:406–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01602.x
Goosem M (2007) Fragmentation impacts caused by roads through rainforests.Curr Sci1587–1595
Grenat PR, Pollo FE, Ferrero MA, Martino AL (2019) Differential and additive effects of natural biotic and anthropogenic noise on call properties of Odontophrynus americanus (Anura, Odontophryinidae): Implications for the conservation of anurans inhabiting noisy environments. Ecol Indic 99:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.014
Herrera-Montes MI, Aide TM (2011) Impacts of traffic noise on anuran and bird communities. Urban Ecosyst 14:415–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0158-7
Jaeger JA, Bowman J, Brennan J et al (2005) Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: an interactive model of road avoidance behavior. Ecol Model 185:329–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.015
Kaiser K, Devito J, Jones CG et al (2015) Effects of anthropogenic noise on endocrine and reproductive function in White’s treefrog, Litoria caerulea. Conserv Physiol 3:cou061. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cou061
Karraker NE, Gibbs JP, Vonesh JR (2008) Impacts of road deicing salt on the demography of vernal pool-breeding amphibians. Ecol Appl 18:724–734. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1644.1
León E, Peltzer PM, Lorenzon R, Lajmanovich RC, Beltzer AH (2019) Effect of traffic noise on Scinax nasicus advertisement call (Amphibia, Anura). Iheringia Série Zool 109. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019007
Lengagne T (2008) Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea. Biol Conserv 141:2023–2031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.017
Lourenço-de-Moraes R, Campos FS, Ferreira RB, Beard KH, Solé M, Llorente GA, Bastos RP (2020) Functional traits explain amphibian distribution in the brazilian Atlantic. For J Biogeogr 47:275–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13727
Madadi H, Moradi H, Soffianian A, Salmanmahiny A, Senn J, Geneletti D (2017) Degradation of natural habitats by roads: comparing land-take and noise effect zone. Environ. Impact Assess Rev 65:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.003
Maleki K, Hosseini SM (2011) Investigation of the effects of leaves, branches and canopies of trees on noise pollution reduction. J Environ Sci 5:13–21
Mazerolle MJ (2004) Amphibian road mortality in response to nightly variations in traffic intensity. Herpetologica 60:45–53.
Muñoz MI, Penna M (2016) Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows. J Comp Physiol A 202:473–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1093-0
Nelson DV, Klinck H, Carbaugh-Rutland A, Mathis CL, Morzillo AT, Garcia TS (2017) Calling at the highway: the spatiotemporal constraint of road noise on Pacific chorus frog communication. Ecol Evol 7:429–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2622
ONDaT: Observatorio Nacional de Datos de Transporte (2016) Centro Tecnológico de Transporte, Tránsito y Seguridad Vial - Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. http://ondat.fra.utn.edu.ar/
Parris KM, Velik-Lord M, North JM (2009) Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecol Soc 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02687-140125
Penna M, Márquez R (2007) Amplification and spectral modification of incoming vocalizations inside burrows of the frog Eupsophus roseus (Leptodactylidae). Bioacoustics 16:245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2007.9753580
Pereyra LC, Akmentins MS, Vaira M, Moreno CE (2018) Disentangling the multiple components of anuran diversity associated to different land-uses in Yungas forests, Argentina. Anim Conserv 21:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12406
Pereyra LC, Akmentins MS, Salica MJ, Quiroga MF, Moreno CE, Vaira M (2021) Tolerant and avoiders in an urban landscape: anuran species richness and functional groups responses in the Yungas’ forest of NW Argentina. Urban Ecosyst 24:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01025-y
Pinto FA, Clevenger AP, Grilo C (2020) Effects of roads on terrestrial vertebrate species in Latin America. Environ Impact Assess Rev 81:106337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106337
Rabin LA, McCowan B, Hooper SL, Owings DH (2003) Anthropogenic noise and its effect on animal communication: an interface between comparative psychology and conservation biology.Int J Comp Psychol16(2)
R Core Team (2017) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Reijnen R, Foppen R (1995) The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. IV. Influence of population size on the reduction of density close to a highway. J Appl Ecol 481–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404646
Roca IT, Desrochers L, Giacomazzo M et al (2016) Shifting song frequencies in response to anthropogenic noise: a meta-analysis on birds and anurans. Behav Ecol 27:1269–1274. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw060
Rytwinski T, Soanes K, Jaeger JA, Fahrig L, Findlay CS, Houlahan J, van der Ree R, van der Grift EA (2016) How effective is road mitigation at reducing road-kill? A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0166941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166941
Salas NE, Zavattieri MV, Di Tada IE, Martino AL, Bridarolli ME (1998) Bioacustical and etho-ecological features in amphibian communities of southern Córdoba province (Argentina). Cuad Herpet 12:37–48
Sayers IIC, Moreland C, Morgan H, Arévalo JE (2020) Efecto de corto plazo del ruido por tráfico sobre coros de aves en un bosque nuboso neotropical.Zeledonia23(2)
Schwartz JJ, Bee MA (2013) Anuran acoustic signal production in noisy environments. In: Brumm H (ed) Animal communication and noise. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 91–132
Semlitsch RD, Ryan T, Hamed K et al (2007) Salamander abundance along road edges and within abandoned logging roads in Appalachian forests. Conserv Biol 21:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00571.x
Simmons AM, Narins PM (2018) Effects of anthropogenic noise on amphibians and reptiles. In: Slabbekoorn H, Dooling RJ, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Effects of anthropogenic noise on animals. Springer, New York, pp 179–208
Slabbekoorn H (2004) Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two african forest types. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3727–3733. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1811121
Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS ONE 3:e4065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004065
Sun JW, Narins PM (2005) Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biol Conserv 121:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.017
Tennessen JB, Parks SE, Langkilde T (2014) Traffic noise causes physiological stress and impairs breeding migration behaviour in frogs. Conserv Physiol 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cou032
Tennessen JB, Parks SE, Swierk L et al (2018) Frogs adapt to physiologically costly anthropogenic noise. Proc R Soc Lond B 285:20182194. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2194
Troïanowski M, Mondy N, Dumet A, Arcanjo C, Lengagne T (2017) Effects of traffic noise on tree frog stress levels, immunity, and color signaling. Conserv Biol 31:1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12893
Van Renterghem T, Botteldooren D, Verheyen K (2012) Road traffic noise shielding by vegetation belts of limited depth. J Sound Vib 331:2404–2425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.006
Vargas-Salinas F, Cunnington GM, Amézquita A, Fahrig L (2014) Does traffic noise alter calling time in frogs and toads? A case study of anurans in eastern Ontario, Canada. Urban Ecosyst 17:945–953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183342
Vialidad Nacional, 2021. http://transito.vialidad.gob.ar:8080/SelCE_WEB/tmda.html. Accessed 15 November 2021
Warren PS, Katti M, Ermann M, Brazel A (2006) Urban bioacoustics: it’s not just noise. Anim Behav 71:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.07.014
Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–181
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Secretary of Research and Technology of National University of Río Cuarto (PPI 18/C475) and National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion FONCYT (BID-PICT 2533 − 2014; 2530 − 2019). The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of National University of Rio Cuarto – COEDI, UNRC (protocol code 241 − 21).
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Secretary of Research and Technology of National University of Río Cuarto (PPI 18/C475) and National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion FONCYT (BID-PICT 2533 − 2014; 2530 − 2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PG, MM and AM conceived the ideas and study. PG, MM, FP, MO and MB collected the data; PG and MM performed the acoustic analyzes. PG analyzed the data; AM directed the working group. All authors contributed critically to the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Communicated By David Hawksworth
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Grenat, P., Michelli, M., Pollo, F. et al. Traffic noise and breeding site characteristics influencing assemblage composition of anuran species associated to roads. Biodivers Conserv 32, 1931–1947 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02584-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02584-0