Abstract
Conservation planning requires information at adequate scales for decision-making and priority definition. Considering the importance of the Usumacinta river basin, we assessed the distribution of vertebrate richness (amphibians, birds and mammals), threatened species, and their representativeness in protected areas (PAs). We overlapped distribution polygons derived from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species over a 72 km2 grid of the watershed and overlapped the PAs. For the three groups we defined areas of high species richness and threatened species (hotspots), and defined three conservation targets (25, 50 and 75% of species richness of each group) and their representativeness in PAs. We found hotspots for birds and mammals, and high heterogeneity within the three groups. In total 81, 98 and 94% of amphibians, birds and mammals are present in at least in one PA, as well as 69, 78 and 53% of threatened amphibians, mammals and birds, respectively. Most of the high richness cells are not protected—only 26% of the 50% species richness cells and 10% of the 75% target cells. We highlight the need for complementing the PA system in the three countries comprising the study area (Mexico, Belize and Guatemala) in order to protect vertebrate diversity and reduce the growing threats to the basin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)/The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME) repository, [www.protectedplanet.net.], Bird species distribution maps of the world from BirdLife International, Handbook of the Birds of the World, [http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/requestdis] and the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2018 [www.iucnredlist.org].
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abellán P, Sánchez-Fernández D (2015) A gap analysis comparing the effectiveness of Natura 2000 and national protected area networks in representing European amphibians and reptiles. Biodivers Conserv 24:1377–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0862-3
Anderson C, Domschke C (2014) GIS Methods for Identifying Wintering Marine Bird Hotspots in the U.S. Salish Sea. University of Washington, Audubon, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Seattle, WA, pp. 1–50
Balmford A, Green MJB, Murray MG (1996) Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: I. Regional tests. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 263:1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0186
BirdLife International, Handbook of the Birds of the World (2019) Bird species distribution maps of the world. BirdLife International, Cambridge
Boitani L, Maiorano L, Baisero D, Falcucci A, Visconti P, Rondinini C (2011) What spatial data do we need to develop global mammal conservation strategies? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:2623–2632. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0117
Brum FT et al (2017) Global priorities for conservation across multiple dimensions of mammalian diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:7641–7646. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706461114
Buchanan GM, Donald PF, Butchart SH (2011) Identifying priority areas for conservation: a global assessment for forest-dependent birds. PLoS ONE 6:e29080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029080
Buisson L, Grenouillet G, Villeger S, Canal J, Laffaille P (2013) Toward a loss of functional diversity in stream fish assemblages under climate change. Glob Change Biol 19:387–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12056
Ceballos G (2007) Conservation priorities for mammals in megadiverse Mexico: the efficiency of reserve networks. Ecol Appl 17:569–578. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0134
Ceballos G, Rodríguez P, Medellín RA (1998) Assesing conservation priorities in megadiverse Mexico: mammalian diversity, endemicity and endangerment. Ecol Appl 8:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0008:ACPIMM]2.0.CO;2
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Soberón J, Salazar I, Fay JP (2005) Global mammal conservation: what must we manage? Science 309:603–607. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114015
Ceballos G, García A, Ehrlich PR (2010) The sixth extinction crisis loss of animal populations and species. J Cosmol 8:1821–1831
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, Garcia A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM (2015) Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 1:e1400253. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Dirzo R (2017) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E6089–E6096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Pacheco J, Valverde-Zúñiga N, Daily GC (2019) Conservation in human-dominated landscapes: lessons from the distribution of the Central American squirrel monkey. Biol Conserv 237:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.008
Chi Y, Wang J, Xi C, Qian T, Sheng C (2020) Spatial pattern of species richness among terrestrial mammals in China. Diversity. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12030096
Cleasby IR, Owen E, Wilson LJ, Bolton M (2018) Combining habitat modelling and hotspot analysis to reveal the location of high density seabird areas across the UK. RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire
de la Maza J, Carabias J (2011) Usumacinta: bases para una política de sustentabilidad ambiental. Instituto mexicano de Tecnología del Agua – Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos A.C., Mexico city, Mexico
Di Minin E et al (2016) Global priorities for national carnivore conservation under land use change. Sci Rep 6:23814. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23814
Environmental Systems Research Institute (2016) ArcGIS 10.5. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, USA
Forero-Medina G, Joppa L (2010) Representation of global and national conservation priorities by Colombia’s Protected Area Network. PLoS ONE 5:e13210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013210
García A (2006) Using ecological niche modelling to identify diversity hotspots for the herpetofauna of Pacific lowlands and adjacent interior valleys of Mexico. Biol Conserv 130:25–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.030
Gauthier P, Debussche M, Thompson JD (2010) Regional priority setting for rare species based on a method combining three criteria. Biol Conserv 143:1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.032
Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24:189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
González-Maya JF, Víquez-R LR, Belant JL, Ceballos G (2015) Effectiveness of protected areas for representing species and populations of terrestrial mammals in Costa Rica. PLoS ONE 10:e0124480. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124480
González-Maya JF, Arias-Alzate A, Granados-Peña R, Mancera-Rodríguez NJ, Ceballos G (2016a) Environmental determinants and spatial mismatch of mammal diversity measures in Colombia. Anim Biodivers Conserv 39:77–87
González-Maya JF, Víquez-R LR, Arias-Alzate A, Belant JL, Ceballos G (2016b) Spatial patterns of species richness and functional diversity in Costa Rican terrestrial mammals: implications for conservation. Divers Distrib 22:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12373
González-Maya JF, Martinez-Meyer E, Medellin R, Ceballos G (2017) Distribution of mammal functional diversity in the Neotropical realm: Influence of land-use and extinction risk. PLoS ONE 12:e0175931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175931
Grenyer R et al (2006) Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature 444:93–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05237
IUCN (2012) IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Glan
IUCN (2018) IUCN red list of threatened species. International Union for Conservation of Nature. www.iucnredlist.org. accessed 2 Nov 2018
Jenkins CN, Giri C (2008) Protection of mammal diversity in Central America. Conserv Biol 22:1037–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00974.x
Jolon Morales M (2005) Recopilación de información sobre la biodiversidad en Guatemala. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Protegidas, Guatemala, guatemala
Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M, Legakis A, Vokou D, Lebrun P (2004) Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 120:471–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.020
Kauffer EF (2010) Migraciones y agua en la frontera entre México, Guatemala y Belice: aproximaciones en torno a una relación multiforme. Revista LiminaR Estudios Sociales y Humanísticos 8:29–45
Knight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv Biol 22:610–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00914.x
Koleff P et al. (2009) Identificación de prioridades y análisis de vacíos y omisiones en la conservación de la biodiversidad de México. In. Comisión Nacional de Biodiversidad, México DF, pp 651–718
Lamoreux JF, Morrison JC, Ricketts TH, Olson DM, Dinerstein E, McKnight MW, Shugart HH (2006) Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature 440:212–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04291
Llorente-Bousquets J, Ocegued S (2008) Estado del conocimiento de la biota. In: Sarukhán J (ed) Capital natural de México, vol I. Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad, vol I. Comisión Nacional de Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico city, pp 283–322
Loarie SR, Duffy PB, Hamilton H, Asner GP, Field CB, Ackerly DD (2009) The velocity of climate change. Nature 462:1052–1055. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08649
Maestri R, Patterson BD (2016) Patterns of species richness and turnover for the South American rodent fauna. PLoS ONE 11:e0151895. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151895
Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012251
Martínez-Meyer E, Sosa-Escalante JE, Álvarez Noguera F (2014) El estudio de la biodiversidad en México: ¿una ruta con dirección? Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.43248
Martin-Regalado CN, Briones-Salas M, Lavariega MC, Moreno CE (2019) Spatial incongruence in the species richness and functional diversity of cricetid rodents. PLoS ONE 14:e0217154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217154
McInnes L et al (2013) Do global diversity patterns of vertebrates reflect those of monocots? PLoS ONE 8:e56979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056979
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Negret PJ, Di-Marco M, Sonter LJ, Rhodes J, Possingham HP, Maron M (2020) Effects of spatial autocorrelation and sampling design on estimates of protected area effectiveness. Conserv Biol 34:1452–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13522
Oberprieler SK, Andersen AN, Gillespie GR, Einoder LD (2019) Vertebrates are poor umbrellas for invertebrates: cross-taxon congruence in an Australian tropical savanna. Ecosphere 10:e02755. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2755
Olson D, Dinerstein E (2002) The global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 89:199–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/3298564
Ortega-Baes P, Godínez-Alvarez H (2005) Global diversity and conservation priorities in the Cactaceae. Biodivers Conserv 15:817–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-1461-x
Pacifici M et al (2020) Global correlates of range contractions and expansions in terrestrial mammals. Nat Commun 11:2840. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16684-w
Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.300
Peeters A et al (2015) Getis–Ord’s hot- and cold-spot statistics as a basis for multivariate spatial clustering of orchard tree data. Comput Electron Agric 111:140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.12.011
Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG (2016) Bird conservation and biodiversity research in Mexico: status and priorities. J Field Ornithol 87:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12146
Rodrigues AS et al (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02422
Roll U et al (2017) The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1677–1682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0332-2
Rosati L, Marignani M, Blasi C (2008) A gap analysis comparing Natura 2000 vs National Protected Area network with potential natural vegetation. Commun Ecol 9:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.2.3
Sarkar S, Sánchez-Cordero V, Londoño MC, Fuller T (2008) Systematic conservation assessment for the Mesoamerica, Chocó, and Tropical Andes biodiversity hotspots: a preliminary analysis. Biodivers Conserv 18:1793–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9559-1
Schipper J et al (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322:225–230. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165115
Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science (new York, NY) 306:1783–1786. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103538
UNEP, IUCN (2018) Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)/The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME). UNEP, IUCN, Gland, Suiza
Vaca RA, Rodiles-Hernandez R, Ochoa-Gaona S, Taylor-Aquino NE, Obregon-Viloria R, Diaz-Garcia DA, Navarrete-Gutierrez DA (2018) Evaluating and supporting conservation action in agricultural landscapes of the Usumacinta River Basin. J Environ Manage 230:392–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.055
Wilson KA et al (2010) Conserving biodiversity in production landscapes. Ecol Appl 20:1721–1732. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1051.1
Xu H et al (2008) Biodiversity congruence and conservation strategies: a national test. Bioscience 58:632–639. https://doi.org/10.1641/b580710
Yañez-Aranciba A, Day JW, Currie-Alder B (2009) Functioning of the Grijalva-Usumacinta River Delta, Mexico challenges for coastal management. Ocean Yearbook 23:473–501. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116001-90000205
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Centro del Cambio Global y la Sustentabilidad en el Sureste AC, and was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) and Gobierno del Estado de Tabasco through the project TAB-2012-C28-194316. We deeply thank R. Loyola (q.e.p.d.) and J. Carabias for allowing the development of the project and their suggestions to improve the manuscript. Special thanks to the editor and reviewers for their comments, which significantly improved the manuscript, and to Brett Butler for a thorough revision of language and grammar, improving final versions of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) and Gobierno del Estado de Tabasco through project TAB-2012-C28-194316.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity protection and reserves.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González-Maya, J.F., Hurtado-Moreno, A.P. & Escobedo-Galván, A.H. Biodiverse river basins: assessing coverage of protected areas for terrestrial vertebrates. Biodivers Conserv 30, 3151–3166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02240-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02240-5