Abstract
Cattle ranchers are challenged to meet the needs of a growing population in an environmentally sustainable manner while also contributing to biodiversity conservation on rangelands. Incentive programs have been developed to encourage voluntary stewardship of endangered species on privately owned and managed lands. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of such programs from the perspective of the rancher. We interviewed cattle ranchers participating in a national program that supported voluntary stewardship initiatives to support the recovery of species at risk in southwest Saskatchewan, Canada. Out of 23 ranchers interviewed, 21 identified as having ranched their entire lives. Their insights provide expert opinion on species at risk conservation on privately managed agricultural lands. The data found that 100% of the interviewed ranchers were satisfied with the program they were involved in and felt that being in the program was beneficial to them. Through participation in this voluntary stewardship program, these ranchers actively conserved habitat for species at risk and were rewarded for their stewardship. Other significant findings were the value of having a local delivery agency for stewardship programs, and the need to educate the general public about the species at risk habitat stewardship that cattle ranchers provide. We conclude with eight recommendations for national program consideration to contribute to more effective and robust policy development regarding species at risk conservation on agricultural lands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Data source: South of the Divide Conservation Action Program Inc
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
There is no data to be deposited in a repository as our study used qualitative data. Currently, there is not an online space per se for the release and distribution of NVivo datasets, which are based on qualitative and mixed methods research. Part of the concern is that there are privacy issues with using raw qualitative data, which may be used to re-identify participants to the research.
References
Agriculture T, Bennett NJ, Whitty TS, Finkbeiner E, Pittman J, Bassett H, Gelcich S, Allison EH, College M, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Cowling A, Government of Alberta, Hanson T, Wiles GJ, Gaydos JK, Hayward MW, Herse MR, With KA et al (2018) A novel public–private partnership model for improving the listing of endangered species. J Appl Ecol 6(1):597–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2018.1443666
Barnes J, Dayer AA., Sketch M, Gramza A, Nocera T, Steinmetz A, Sorice MG (2019) Landowners and the Conservation Reserve Program: understanding motivations and needs to cultivate participation, retention, and ongoing stewardship behavior. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/88444
Brenner JC, Lavallato S, Cherry M, Hileman E (2013) Land Use Policy Land use determines interest in conservation easements among private landowners. Land Use Policy 35:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.006
Brown HCP (2019) Exploring rural landowners’ willingness to protect species at risk in Prince Edward Island. Can Geogr 63(2):312–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12516
Brunson MW, Huntsinger L (2014) Ranching as a conservation strategy: can old ranchers save the New West. Rangel Ecol Manag 61(2):137–147. https://doi.org/10.2111/07-063.1
Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, Strien AV, Jörn PW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Anna M, Csirke J, Davidson N, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN et al (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168
Clements HS, Cumming GS (2017) Positives and pathologies of natural resource management on private land-conservation areas. Conserv Biol 31(3):707–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12864
Dayer AA, Lutter SH, Sesser KA, Hickey CM, Gardali T (2018) Private landowner conservation behavior following participation in voluntary incentive programs: recommendations to facilitate behavioral persistence. Conserv Lett 11(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12394
Dotta G, Phalan B, Silva TW, Green R, Balmford A (2016) Assessing strategies to reconcile agriculture and bird conservation in the temperate grasslands of South America. Conserv Biol 30(3):618–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12635
Dreitz VJ, Stinson LT, Hahn BA, Tack JD, Lukacs PM (2017) A large-scale perspective for managing prairie avifauna assemblages across the western US: influences of habitat, land ownership and latitude. PeerJ 1:1–17. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2879
Environment and Climate Change Canada (2017) Action plan for multiple species at risk in Southwestern Saskatchewan: south of the divide. In: Species at risk act action plan series. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/eccc/CW69-21-49-2017-eng.pdf
Greiner R (2016) Factors influencing farmers’ participation in contractual biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment with northern Australian pastoralists. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 60(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12098
Hayward MW (2011) Using the IUCN Red List to determine effective conservation strategies. Biodivers Conserv 20(12):2563–2573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0091-3
Henderson AE, Davis SK (2014) Rangeland health assessment: a useful tool for linking range management and grassland bird conservation? Rangel Ecol Manag 67(1):88–98. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-12-00140.1
Henderson AE, Reed M, Davis SK (2014) Voluntary Stewardship and the Canadian species at risk act: exploring rancher willingness to support species at risk in the Canadian Prairies. Hum Dimens Wildl 19(1):17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2013.819595
Kamal S, Kocór M, Grodzińska-Jurczak M (2015) Conservation opportunity in biodiversity conservation on regulated private lands: factors influencing landowners’ attitude. Environ Sci Policy 54:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.023
McCune JL, Carlsson AM, Colla S, Davy C, Favaro B, Ford AT, Fraser KC, Martins EG (2017) Assessing public commitment to endangered species protection: a Canadian case study. Facets 2(1):178–194. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0054
Olive A, McCune JL (2017) Wonder, ignorance, and resistance: landowners and the stewardship of endangered species. J Rural Stud 49:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.014
Pimm SL, Alibhai S, Bergl R, Dehgan A, Giri C, Jewell Z, Joppa L, Kays R, Loarie S (2015) Emerging technologies to conserve biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 30(11):685–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.008
Pittman J (2019) The struggle for local autonomy in biodiversity conservation governance. J Environ Plan Manag 62(1):172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1511416
Ramsdell CP, Sorice MG, Dwyer AM (2016) Using financial incentives to motivate conservation of an at-risk species on private lands. Environ Conserv 43(1):34–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892915000302
Raymond CM, Lechner AM, Lockwood M, Carter O, Harris RMB, Gilfedder L (2015) Private land manager capacity to conserve threatened communities under climate change. J Environ Manag 159:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.048
Roche LM, Cutts BB, Derner JD, Lubell MN, Tate KW (2015) On-ranch grazing strategies: context for the rotational grazing dilemma. Rangel Ecol Manag 68(3):248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2015.03.011
Selinske MJ, Howard N, Fitzsimons JA, Hardy MJ, Smillie K, Forbes J, Tymms K, Knight AT (2019) Monitoring and evaluating the social and psychological dimensions that contribute to privately protected area program effectiveness. Biol Conserv 229:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.11.026
Tittensor DP, Walpole M, Hill SLL, Boyce DG, Britten GL, Burgess ND, Butchart SHM, Leadley PW, Regan EC, Alkemade R, Baumung R, Bellard C, Bouwman L, Bowles-newark NJ, Chenery AM, Cheung WWL (2014) A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346(6206):241–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7489(94)90078-7
Yeiser JM, Morgan JJ, Baxley DL, Chandler RB, Martin JA (2018) Private land conservation has landscape-scale benefits for wildlife in agroecosystems. J Appl Ecol 55(4):1930–1939. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13136
Yin RK (2014) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Zabala A, Pascual U, García-Barrios L (2017) Payments for pioneers? Revisiting the role of external rewards for sustainable innovation under heterogeneous motivations. Ecol Econ 135:234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.011
Zabel A (2019) Biodiversity-based payments on Swiss alpine pastures. Land Use Policy 81:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.035
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the ranchers who gave so generously of their time and insight in this study, as well as staff of the South of the Divide Conservation Action Program Inc. and the Saskatchewan Stock Growers Association. Finally, this research was supported by the MITACS Accelerate program.
Funding
This research was supported by the MITACS Accelerate program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Consent to participate
All people interviewed signed a consent form acknowledging that ‘By signing this document, you are assumed to have provided your consent for us to record and use the answers you have provided.’
Consent for publication
All people interviewed signed a consent form acknowledging that ‘The research report, for which the information collected will be used, will be published and will, therefore, be publicly available. However, the results of data analysis will report only aggregate results. Where individual responses are reported, names and other information that may identify an individual will not be used, so as to protect your privacy, unless otherwise agreed upon by the researcher and the participant.’
Ethical approval
Human Research Ethics Approval has been obtained from the University of British Columbia: H18-03648.
Additional information
Communicated by Mike Kevin Joy.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity appreciation and engagement.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reiter, D., Parrott, L. & Pittman, J. Species at risk habitat conservation on private land: the perspective of cattle ranchers. Biodivers Conserv 30, 2377–2393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02199-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02199-3