Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The successive trend of vegetation confirms the removal of non-indigenous woody species as an insufficient restoration action

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive woody species can substantially affect their environment and communities, enhancing the interest in conservation management. Non-indigenous dwarf pine (Pinus mugo) in the treeline ecotone of the Eastern High Sudetes Mountains and its experimental removal is the model example. We asked how species composition and diversity develop after it is clearcut, and what are the main drivers leading to alpine grasslands restoration. On the study site (Jeseníky Mts., the Czech Republic), three distinct habitats were distinguished: plots after clearcut, alpine grasslands, and dwarf pine plantation. Plant species composition was assessed by means of phytosociological relevés together with selected plant traits and environmental factors. We compared temporal trends in species number, diversity, and plant traits among the habitats. Species richness and diversity has increased since the dwarf pine was clearcut. This trend was the same for all three types of habitats studied, although they were significantly different in spatial compositional heterogeneity and species structure. Species composition among study habitats differed and went through its own successive trend of community development during time as the consequence of species turnover. We revealed that light-demanding plant species preferring low nitrogen concentrations were associated with the successional trend after the dwarf pine was clearcut. Dwarf pine removal creates conditions for alpine grassland restoration, but restoration can take a long time because of the environmental conditions, dwarf pine legacy, and plant traits that determine the succession direction. We recommend implementing adaptive management with long-term monitoring followed by actions to correct the desired state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by project of Palacky University in Olomouc IGA_PrF_2020_020. This project was also funded by the Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences (RVO 67985939).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MZ and MB, conceived and planned the experiment design, and collected data. MZ wrote the manuscript with support from JS. JC carried out the laboratory analyses. JS processed the experimental data, performed the analysis, and designed the figures. MB supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslav Zeidler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare there are any conflicts of interests that could have influenced the reporting of the experimental data or conclusions in the article.

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniel Sanchez Mata.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1434 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeidler, M., Šipoš, J., Banaš, M. et al. The successive trend of vegetation confirms the removal of non-indigenous woody species as an insufficient restoration action. Biodivers Conserv 30, 699–717 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02113-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02113-x

Keywords

Navigation