Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conserving populations at the edge of their geographic range: the endangered Caspian red deer (Cervus elaphus maral) across protected areas of Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large ungulate populations around the world are declining, experience range loss or even go extinct. Ecological theory predicts that a species’ vulnerability is greater at the edges of its geographic range compared to its core. However, edge populations may still be successfully managed inside reserves when the drivers of declines are addressed with priority. Our aim was to evaluate the status of Caspian red deer in Iran and address the importance of law enforcement and landscape connectivity between reserves. Using systematic occurrence records and ranger-based censuses, we applied multiple methods to model the Caspian red deer’s distribution, quantify population trajectory metrics and predict landscape connectivity. Additionally, we ran generalized linear models in a Bayesian approach to assess the importance of ranger stations and connectivity on population abundance. We estimated the population at 747 (CI 95% 604–890) individuals being confined to 21 areas, reflecting a decline by 59% compared to an estimate in 1977 with declining trajectories in 98% of reserves. The number of ranger stations was the only factor correlating with its population abundance. Moreover, extirpation and range loss mostly occurred in the periphery of its Iranian distribution, and we detected five stepping stone areas in the center of the range. Our study suggests that under conditions of heavy poaching and competition with livestock, conservation urgently needs to focus on increased law enforcement and improvement of habitat quality to stop declines and prevent extinction of this large ungulate in Iran.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi M, Nezami Balouchi B, Jowkar H, Hemami MR, Fadakar D, Malakouti-Khah S, Ostrowski S (2017) Combining landscape suitability and habitat connectivity to conserve the last surviving population of cheetah in Asia. Divers Distrib 23(6):592–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhani H, Djamali M, Ghorbanalizadeh A, Ramezani E (2010) Plant biodiversity of Hyrcanian relict forests, N Iran: an overview of the flora, vegetation, palaeoecology and conservation. Pak J Bot 42(231):258

    Google Scholar 

  • Benítez-López A, Alkemade R, Schipper AM, Ingram DJ, Verweij PA, Eikelboom J, Huijbregts MA (2017) The impact of hunting on tropical mammal and bird populations. Science 356(180):183

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleyhl B, Arakelyan M, Askerov E, Bluhm H, Gavashelishvili A, Ghasabian M, Manvelyan K (2019) Assessing niche overlap between domestic and threatened wild sheep to identify conservation priority areas. Divers Distrib 25(1):129–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleyhl B, Baumann M, Griffiths P, Heidelberg A, Manvelyan K, Radeloff VC, Kuemmerle T (2017) Assessing landscape connectivity for large mammals in the Caucasus using Landsat 8. Remote Sens Environ 193(193):203

    Google Scholar 

  • Boakes EH, Isaac NJ, Fuller RA, Mace GM, McGowan PJ (2018) Examining the relationship between local extinction risk and position in range. Biol Conserv 32(1):229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitenmoser U, Askerov E, Soofi M, Breitenmoser-Würsten CH, Heidelberg A, Manvelyan K, Zazanashvili N (2017) Transboundary leopard conservation in the lesser Caucasus and the Alborz range. Cat News 65:24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, McRAE BH, Brookes A (2012) Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conserv Biol 26:7887

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G, Grice D, Barker R, Brown B (1988) The edge of the range. J Anim Ecol 771:785

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Ehrlic PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM (2015) Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 1(5):e1400253

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow R, Plumptre AJ, Alidria B, Nsubuga M, Driciru M, Rwetsiba A, Beale CM (2017) Improving law-enforcement effectiveness and efficiency in protected areas using ranger-collected monitoring data. Conserv Lett 10:572–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvishsefat AA (2006) Atlas of protected areas of Iran. University of Tehran, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskin JH, Pringle RM (2018) Warfare and wildlife declines in Africa’s protected areas. Nature 553(328):332

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marco JP, Corrêa Nóbrega C (2018) Evaluating collinearity effects on species distribution models: An approach based on virtual species simulation. PLoS ONE 13(9):e0202403

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Marco M, Boitani L, Mallon D, Hoffmann M, Iacucci A, Meijaard E, Rondinini C (2014) A retrospective evaluation of the global decline of carnivores and ungulates. Conserv Biol 28(1109):1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Minin E, Toivonen T (2015) Global protected area expansion: creating more than paper parks. Bioscience 65(637):638

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson BG, Roemer GW, McRae BH, Rundall JM (2013) Models of regional habitat quality and connectivity for pumas (Puma concolor) in the southwestern United States. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081898

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson BG, Albano ChM, Anantharaman R, Beier P, Fargione J, Graves TA, Theobald DM (2018) Circuit theory applications to connectivity science and conservation. Conserv Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF, Greenwood JJ (2001) Spatial patterns of range contraction in British breeding birds. Ibis 143(593):601

    Google Scholar 

  • DoE (2016) Geographic layer of Iran’s protected areas.

  • Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Leitão PJ (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36(27):46

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormann CF (2016) Overdispersion, and how to deal with it in R and JAGS. Accessed on November 2019 https://biometry.github.io/APES.

  • Duan RY, Kong XQ, Huang MY, Fan WY, Wang ZG (2014) The predictive performance and stability of six species distribution models. PLoS ONE 9(11):e112764

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S (2010) The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol Evol 1(330):342

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Daniel Kissling W (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth EJ, Ogurcak DE (2006) Biogeography and decline of rare plants in New England: historical evidence and contemporary monitoring. Ecol Appl 16(4):1327–1337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Firouz E (1976) Environmental and nature conservation in Iran. Environ Conserv 3(1):33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DO (2011) Trajectories from extinction: where are missing mammals rediscovered? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20(415):425

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Szabo JK (2018) Conservation and the 4 Rs, which are rescue, rehabilitation, release, and research. Conser Biol 32(1):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2014) Bayesian data analysis, vol 2. Chapman, Boca Raton FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoddousi A, Kh Hamidi A, Soofi M, Khorozyan I, Kiabi B, Waltert M (2016) Effects of ranger stations on predator and prey distribution and abundance in an I ranian steppe landscape. Anim Conserv 19(273):280

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoddousi A, Soofi M, Hamidi AK, Ashayeri S, Egli L, Ghoddousi S, Waltert M (2019) The decline of ungulate populations in Iranian protected areas calls for urgent action against poaching. Oryx 53(151):158

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Collins CD (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1(2):e1500052

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison XA (2014) Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ 2:e616

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld R, Haeck J (1982) The distribution of abundance. I Measurements J Biogeogr 303:316

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman MP, Hayward MW, Kelly MJ, Balkenhol N (2018) Enhancing conservation network design with graph-theory and a measure of protected area effectiveness: Refining wildlife corridors in Belize, Central America. Landsc Urban Plan 178:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini M, Farashi A, Khani A, Farhadinia MS (2019) Landscape connectivity for mammalian megafauna along the Iran-Turkmenistan-Afghanistan borderland. J Nat Conserv 52:125735

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachmann H (2008) Illegal wildlife use and protected area management in Ghana. Biol Conserv 141(1906):1918

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanda LL, Fuller TK, Sievert PR, Kellogg RL (2009) Seasonal source–sink dynamics at the edge of a species’ range. Ecology 90(1574):1585

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth K (1979) K, Nichols JD, Karanth KU, Hines JE, Christensen NL (2010) The shrinking ark: patterns of large mammal extinctions in India. Proc Biol Sci 277:1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley ATH, Beier P, Gagnon JW (2016) Estimating landscape resistance from habitat suitability: Effects of data source and nonlinearities. Landsc Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0387-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kery M, Royle JA (2016) Applied Hierarchical Modeling in Ecology Analysis of distribution, abundance and species richness in R and BUGS: Volume 1 Prelude and Static Models. Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi R, Hemami MR, Cushman SA (2018) Multispecies assessment of core areas and connectivity of desert carnivores in central Iran. Divers Distrib 24:193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiabi BH (1978) Ecology and management of Maral (Cervus elaphus maral) in northern Iran. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University

  • Kiabi BH, Ali Ghaemi R, Jahanshahi M, Sassani A (2004) Population status, biology and ecology of the Maral, Cervus elaphus maral, in Golestan National Park. Iran Zool Middle East 33(125):138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropil R, Smolko P, Garaj P (2015) Home range and migration patterns of male red deer Cervus elaphus in Western Carpathians. Eur J Wildl Res 61(63):72

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Useche DC, Rendeiro J, Kalka M, Bradshaw CJ, Sloan SP, Alvarez P (2012) Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489(290):294

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson CR, Hodgson JA, Wilson RJ, Richards SA (2014) Prevalence, thresholds and the performance of presence–absence models. Methods in Ecol and Evol 5(1):54–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1993) Range population abundance and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 8:409–413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Collen B, Fuller RA, Boakes EH (2010) Population and geographic range dynamics: implications for conservation planning. Bio Sci 365(1558):3743–3751

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateo-Sánchez MC, Balkenhol N, Cushman S, Pérez T, Domínguez A, Saura S (2015) A comparative framework to infer landscape effects on population genetic structure: Are habitat suitability models effective in explaining gene flow. Landscape Ecol 30(1405):1420

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell S, Fuller RA, Brooks TM, Watson JE (2016) Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature News 536:143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH (2007) COS 10–5: Predicting connectivity using circuit analysis: Theory and applications in conservation planning.

  • McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:27122724

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH, Shah VB (2009) Circuitscape user’s guide. The University of California, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills LS (2013) Conservation of Wildlife Populations: Demography, Genetics and Management, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills LS, Allendorf FW (1996) The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Conserv Biol 10(1509):1518

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JF, Mulindahabi F, Masozera MK, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Turikunkiko E, Oli MK (2018) Are ranger patrols effective in reducing poaching-related threats within protected areas? J Appl Ecol 55(99):107

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Sagheb-Talebi K, Thorn S (2017) Protect Iran’s ancient forest from logging. Science 355(919):919

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190(231):259

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ (2008) Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: a response to Peterson et al. (2007). Ecography 31:272–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31(161):175

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer M (2003) JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing.

  • Plumptre AJ, Fuller RA, Rwetsiba A, Wanyama F, Kujirakwinja D, Driciru M, Possingham HP (2014) Efficiently targeting resources to deter illegal activities in protected areas. J Appl Ecol 51(714):725

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Riggio J, Caro T (2017) Structural connectivity at a national scale: Wildlife corridors in Tanzania. PLoS ONE 12(11):e0187407

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ripple WJ, Newsome TM, Wolf C, Dirzo R, Everatt KT, Galetti M, Lindsey PA (2015) Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores. Sci Adv 1:e1400103

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roever CL, Van Aarde RJ, Leggett K (2013) Functional connectivity within conservation networks: Delineating corridors for African elephants. Biol Conserv 157(128):135

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagheb-Talebi K, Sajedi T, Pourhashemi M (2014) Forests of Iran: A Treasure from the Past, a Hope for the Future. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc Urban Plan 83:91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Rubio L (2010) A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography 33(523):537

    Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Torné J (2009) Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ model softw 24:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma LK, Mukherjee T, Saren PC, Chandra K (2019) Identifying suitable habitat and corridors for Indian Grey Wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) in Chotta Nagpur Plateau and Lower Gangetic Planes: A species with differential management needs. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0215019

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Soofi M et al (2018) Livestock grazing in protected areas and its effects on large mammals in the Hyrcanian forest. Iran Biol Conserv 217:377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Soofi M, Ghoddousi A, Hamidi AK, Ghasemi B, Egli L, Voinopol-Sassu AJ, Waltert M (2017a) Precision and reliability of indirect population assessments for the Caspian red deer Cervus elaphus maral. Wildlife Biology. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soofi M, Egli L, Ghoddousi A, Shokri S, Soufi M, Rabei K, Hosseini M (2017b) The populations status and distribution of Caspian red deer (maral) Cervus elaphus maral in Iran. DSG Newsletter: (29).

  • Trainor AM, Walters JR, Morris WF, Sexton J, Moody A (2013) Empirical estimation of dispersal resistance surfaces: a case study with red-cockaded woodpeckers. Landsc Ecol 28(4):755–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Treves AD et al (2005) Evaluating lethal control in the management of human-wildlife conflict. Conser Bio 9:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey ST, Crees JJ, Di Fonzo MM (2015) Historical data as a baseline for conservation: reconstructing long-term faunal extinction dynamics in Late Imperial–modern China. Proc Royal Soc 282:20151299

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloz SD (2009) Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. J Biogeogr 36(2290):2299

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe GL, Lawton JH, DavidsonWL, (1990) The impact of feral mink Mustela vison on water voles Arvicola terrestris in the North Yorkshire Moors National Park. Biol Conserv 51(49):62

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusefi GH, Faizolahi K, Darvish J, Safi K, Brito JC (2019) The species diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the terrestrial mammals of Iran. J mammal 100(1):55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackulic CB, Sanderson EW, Uriarte M (2011) Anthropogenic and environmental drivers of modern range loss in large mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sc 108(4024):4029

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziaei H (2008) A field guide to the mammals of Iran, 2nd edn. Iranian Wildlife Center, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN (2016) A protocol for conducting and presenting results of regression-type analyses. Methods Ecol Evol 7:636–645

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project would not have been possible without the support of local rangers and staff of three provincial offices of Department of Environment. We are thankful A. Ghoddousi for reviewing the earlier version of the manuscript. This project is implemented under the permits: No. 94/25664 (PhD project of Mah.S; 2014–2017) and No. 98/170/39717 (2019–2021; DAAD-PRIME project of Mah.S).

Funding

The work leading to this publication was supported by the PRIME programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) with funds from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) provided to Mah.S (2019–2021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SHSH, Mah.S, and ChRP conceived the ideas and designed methodology; Mah.S, Mob.S, MA, AJ, ATQ, KR, EH, HA, SHSH and ThZ, and participated actively in collecting the data; SHSH and Mah.S analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. MW, NB, ChRP, BZ, ThZ and BK contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication. The manuscript led by Mah.S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirko Shokri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1316 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shokri, S., Jafari, A., Rabei, K. et al. Conserving populations at the edge of their geographic range: the endangered Caspian red deer (Cervus elaphus maral) across protected areas of Iran. Biodivers Conserv 30, 85–105 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02077-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02077-4

Keywords

Navigation