Abstract
During the last century, afforestation and intensification of sheep grazing in the British uplands have led to widespread declines in globally rare heather moorland. We quantified changes in heather cover over 70 years in relation to changes in sheep grazing on Langholm Moor, and examined the impact on red grouse, a gamebird inhabiting heather moorland. Between 1948 and 2009, when grazed heavily by sheep, heather-dominated vegetation declined from 53 to 14% cover. Large-scale sheep reductions from 2011 then allowed increase of heather-dominated vegetation cover to 18% by 2015. However, changes in heather cover were associated with changes in grouse abundance only where heather-dominated cover was reduced below thresholds of 27% (95% CL 18–36%; pre-breeding) and 17% (95% CL 13–20%; post-breeding). The number of grouse shot between 1951 and 1992 remained high where 37–65% of dominant heather cover was retained, but then declined between 1992 and 1996 following increased predation by raptors, leading to the cessation of shooting. Subsequently, grouse densities fluctuated in relation to periodic management by gamekeepers (1992–1999 and 2008–2016), but heather loss continued possibly until 2011, and predation in this context prevented sustained increases sufficient for ‘driven’ shooting. Grouse shooting provides an economic incentive to maintain and restore heather moorland. On Langholm Moor, however, afforestation in the surrounding landscape and isolation from other heather moors may have led to a grouse population less well buffered against growing predation pressure, especially outside keepered periods. As grouse shooting could not be restored, the future management of the moor remains uncertain.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Aebischer NJ (2019) Fifty-year trends in UK hunting bags of birds and mammals, and calibrated estimation of national bag size, using GWCT’s National Gamebag census. Eur J Wildl Res 65:64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-019-1299-x
Amar A, Grant M, Buchanan G, Sim I, Wilson J, Pearce-Higgins JW, Redpath S (2011) Exploring the relationships between wader declines and current land-use in the British uplands. Bird Study 58:13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2010.513412
Amar A, Court IR, Davison M, Downing S, Grimshaw T, Pickford T, Raw D (2012) Linking nest histories, remotely sensed land use data and wildlife crime records to explore the impact of grouse moor management on peregrine falcon populations. Biol Conserv 145:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.014
Averis ABG, Averis AM (1997) Langholm-Newcastleton Hills heather condition survey. Scottish Natural Heritage contract report L000014
Averis AM, Averis ABG, Birks HJB, Horsfield D, Thompson DBA, Yeo MJM (2004) An illustrated guide to British upland vegetation. JNCC, Exeter
Baines D (1996) The implications of grazing and predator management on the habitats and breeding success of black grouse Tetrao tetrix. J Appl Ecol 33:54–62
Baines D, Richardson M (2013) Hen harriers on a Scottish grouse moor: multiple factors predict breeding density and productivity. J Appl Ecol 50:1397–1405. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12154
Baines D, Warren P, Calladine J (2002) Spatial and temporal differences in the abundance of black grouse and other moorland birds in relation to reductions in sheep grazing. Asp Appl Biol 67:245–252
Calladine J, Baines D, Warren P (2002) Effects of reduced grazing on population density and breeding success of black grouse in northern England. J Appl Ecol 39:772–780. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00753.x
Baines D, Redpath SM, Richardson M, Thirgood SJ (2008) The direct and indirect effects of predation by hen harriers Circus cyaneus on trends in breeding birds on a Scottish grouse moor. Ibis 150:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00848.x
Cattadori IM, Haydon DT, Thirgood SJ, Hudson PJ (2003) Are indirect measures of abundance a useful index of population density? The case of red grouse harvesting. Oikos 100:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12072.x
Clarke JL, Welch D, Gordon IJ (1995) The influence of vegetation pattern on the grazing of heather moorland by red deer and sheep. II. The impact on heather. J Appl Ecol 32:177–186. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404427
Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, van Bommel FPJ (2006) Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.007
Douglas DJT, Bellamy PE, Stephen LS, Pearce-Higgins JW, Wilson JD, Grant MC (2014) Upland land use predicts population decline in a globally near-threatened wader. J Appl Ecol 51:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12167
Elkington T, Dayton N, Jackson DL, Strachan IM (2001) National vegetation classification: field guide to mires and heaths. JNCC, Peterborough
Elston DA, Spezia L, Baines D, Redpath SM (2014) Working with stakeholders to reduce conflict—modelling the impact of varying hen harrier Circus cyaneus densities on red grouse Lagopus lagopus populations. J Appl Ecol 51:1236–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12315
ESRI (2018) ArcGIS desktop 10.6. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands
Etheridge B, Summers RW, Green RE (1997) The effects of illegal killing and destruction of nests by humans on the population dynamics of the hen harrier Circus cyaneus in Scotland. J Appl Ecol 34:1081–1105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2405296
Forestry Commission Scotland (2013) Climate change programme. Forestry Commission Scotland, Edinburgh
Francksen RM, Aebischer NJ, Ludwig SC, Baines D, Whittingham MJ (2019) Measures of predator diet alone may underestimate the collective impact on prey: common buzzard Buteo buteo consumption of economically important red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica. PLoS ONE 14(e0221404):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221404
Fuller RJ, Gough SJ (1999) Changes in sheep numbers in Britain: implications for bird populations. Biol Conserv 91:73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00039-7
Fuller RM, Groom GB, Jones AR (1994) The land gover map of great Britain: an automated classification of landsat thematic mapper data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60:553–562
Gimingham CH (1972) Ecology of heathlands. Chapman and Hall, London
Haines-Young R (2009) Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy 26:S178–S186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.009
Hester AJ, Baillie GJ (1998) Spatial and temporal patterns of heather use by sheep and red deer within natural heather/grass mosaics. J Appl Ecol 35:772–784. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.355348.x
Holden J et al (2007) Environmental change in moorland landscapes. Earth-Sci Rev 82:75–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.01.003
Hudson DJ (1966) Fitting segmented curves whose join points have to be estimated. J Am Stat Assoc 61:1097–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1966.10482198
Hudson PJ (1992) Grouse in space and time. The population of a managed gamebird. Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge
Hudson PJ, Newborn D (1995) Red grouse and moorland management. Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge
Hulme PD, Merrell BG, Torvell L, Fisher JM, Small JL, Pakeman RJ (2002) Rehabilitation of degraded Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull-dominated wet heath by controlled sheep grazing. Biol Conserv 107:351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00073-3
Jenkins D, Watson A, Miller GR (1963) Population studies on red grouse, Lagopus lagopus scoticus (Lath.) in North-East Scotland. J Anim Ecol 32:317–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2598
Ludwig SC, Roos S, Bubb D, Baines D (2017) Long-term trends in abundance and breeding success of red grouse and hen harriers in relation to changing management of a Scottish grouse moor. Wildl Biol. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00246
Ludwig SC, Aebischer NJ, Bubb D, Richardson M, Roos S, Wilson JD, Baines D (2018a) Population responses of red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica to expansion of heather Calluna vulgaris cover on a Scottish grouse moor. Avian Conserv Ecol 13(2):14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01306-130214
Ludwig SC, Aebischer NJ, Bubb D, Roos S, Baines D (2018b) Survival of chicks and adults explains variation in population growth in a recovering red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica population. Wildl Biol. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00430
Ludwig SC, Roos S, Baines D (2019) Responses of breeding waders to restoration of grouse management on a moor in South-West Scotland. J Ornithol 160:789–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01667-6
Ludwig SC, Roos S, Rollie CJ, Baines D (2020) Long-term changes in the abundance and breeding success of raptors and raven in periods of varying management of a Scottish grouse moor. Avian Conserv Ecol 15(1):21. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01568-150121
Mackey EC, Shewry MC, Tudor GJ (1980s) Land cover change: Scotland from the 1940s to the 1980s. The Stationary Office, Edinburgh
Miller GR, Jenkins D, Watson A (1966) Heather performance and red grouse populations. I. Visual estimates of heather performance. J Appl Ecol 3:313–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2401255
Murgatroyd M, Redpath SM, Murphy SG, Douglas DJT, Saunders R, Amar A (2019) Patterns of satellite tagged hen harrier disappearances suggest widespread illegal killing on British grouse moors. Nat Commun 10:1094. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09044-w
Nature Conservancy Council, Countryside Commission for Scotland (1991) National countryside monitoring scheme Scotland: borders. Countryside Commission for Scotland and Nature Conservancy Council, Perth
New LF, Buckland ST, Redpath S, Matthiopoulos J (2012) Modelling the impact of hen harrier management measures on a red grouse population in the UK. Oikos 121:1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19958.x
Pakeman RJ, Hulme PD, Torvell L, Fisher JM (2003) Rehabilitation of degraded dry heather [Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull] moorland by controlled sheep grazing. Biol Conserv 114:389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00067-3
Pearce-Higgins JW, Grant MC (2006) Relationships between bird abundance and the composition and structure of moorland vegetation. Bird Study 53:112–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650609461424
Pringle H, Wilson M, Calladine J, Siriwardena G (2019) Associations between gamebird releases and generalist predators. J Appl Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13451
Redpath SM, Thirgood SJ (1997) Birds of prey and red grouse. Stationery Office, London
Redpath SM, Thirgood SJ (1999) Numerical and functional responses in generalist predators: hen harriers and peregrines on Scottish grouse moors. J Anim Ecol 68:879–892. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00340.x
Reed MS et al (2009) The future of the uplands. Land Use Policy 26:S204–S216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.013
Robertson PA, Park KJ, Barton AF (2001) Loss of heather Calluna vulgaris moorland in the Scottish uplands: the role of red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus management. Wildl Biol 7:11–16
Robertson GS, Aebischer NJ, Baines D (2017a) Using harvesting data to examine temporal and regional variation in red grouse abundance in the British uplands. Wildl Biol. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00276
Robertson GS, Newborn D, Richardson M, Baines D (2017b) Does rotational heather burning increase red grouse abundance and breeding success on moors in northern England? Wildl Biol. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00227
Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J Appl Ecol 39:157–176. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x
Roos S, Smart J, Gibbons DW, Wilson JD (2018) A review of predation as a limiting factor for bird populations in mesopredator-rich landscapes: a case study of the UK. Biol Rev 93:1915–1937. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12426
Rowland CS, Morton RD, Carrasco L, McShane G, O’Neil AW, Wood CM (2017) Land cover map 2015 (1 km percentage target class, GB). NERC Environmental Information Data Centre, Atlanta
Scottish Government (2019) Scotland's forestry strategy 2019–2029. The Scottish Government, Edinburgh
Scottish Natural Heritage (1992) National countryside monitoring scheme, Scotland: dumfries and galloway. Scottish Natural Heritage, Perth
Smith AA, Redpath SM, Campbell ST, Thirgood SJ (2001) Meadow pipits, red grouse and the habitat characteristics of managed grouse moors. J Appl Ecol 38:390–400. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00601.x
Sotherton N, Tapper S, Smith A (2009) Hen harriers and red grouse: economic aspects of red grouse shooting and the implications for moorland conservation. J Appl Ecol 46:955–960. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01688.x
Stevenson AC, Thompson DBA (1993) Long-term changes in the extent of heather moorland in upland Britain and Ireland: palaeoecological evidence for the importance of grazing. The Holocene 3:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/095968369300300108
Thirgood SJ, Redpath SM, Haydon DT, Rothery P, Newton I, Hudson PJ (2000a) Habitat loss and raptor predation: disentangling long- and short-term causes of red grouse declines. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:651–656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1051
Thirgood SJ, Redpath SM, Rothery P, Aebischer NJ (2000b) Raptor predation and population limitation in red grouse. J Anim Ecol 69:504–516. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00413.x
Thompson DBA, MacDonald AJ, Marsden JH, Galbraith CA (1995) Upland heather moorland in Great Britain: a review of international importance, vegetation change and some objectives for nature conservation. Biol Conserv 71:163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00043-P
Thomson S (2011) Response from the hills: business as usual or a turning point?. SAC Rural Policy Centre, Edinburgh
Thomson S, McMorran R, Glass J (2018) Socioeconomic and biodiversity impacts of driven grouse moors in Scotland. Part 1: socio-economic impacts of driven grouse moors in Scotland. Report to Scottish Government. https://sefari.scot/document/socio-economic-and-biodiversity-impacts-of-driven-grouse-moors-in-scotland-part-1-socio. Accessed 31 Jan 2020
Usher MB, Thompson DBA (1993) Variation in the upland heathlands of Great Britain: conservation importance. Biol Conserv 66:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(93)90136-O
Valkama J, Currie D, Korpimäki E (1999) Differences in the intensity of nest predation in the curlew Numenius arquata: a consequence of land use and predator densities? Ecoscience 6:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1999.11682552
Warren P, Baines D (2007) Dispersal distances of juvenile radiotagged red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus on moors in northern England. Ibis 149:758–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00705.x
Warren P, Baines D (2011) Evaluation of the distance sampling technique to survey red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus on moors in northern England. Wildl Biol 17:135–142. https://doi.org/10.2981/10-085
Watson A, Moss R (2008) Grouse. Collins, London
Webb NR (1998) The traditional management of European heathlands. J Appl Ecol 35:987–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00020.x
White PJC, Warren P, Baines D (2013) Forest expansion in Scotland and its potential effects on black grouse Tetrao tetrix conservation. For Ecol Manage 308:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.038
Wilson JD et al (2014) Modelling edge effects of mature forest plantations on peatland waders informs landscape-scale conservation. J Appl Ecol 51:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12173
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted as part of the Langholm Moor Demonstration Project (2008–2017), funded by the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT), Scottish Natural Heritage, Buccleuch Estates, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and Natural England. We thank Buccleuch Estates for access and support throughout the study. GWCT provided data for ground vegetation surveys in 1997, 2007 and 2018 (including measurements of peat depth). We are grateful to J. Ewald, N. Kingdon, K. Lawson and S. Skinner for GIS assistance and preparation of the historic aerial photographs, and H. Weald for help with evaluation of these photographs. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Kevin Edwards.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ludwig, S.C., Aebischer, N.J., Richardson, M. et al. Differential responses of heather and red grouse to long-term spatio-temporal variation in sheep grazing. Biodivers Conserv 29, 2689–2710 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01994-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01994-8
Keywords
- Land-use conflicts
- Heather moorland
- Habitat restoration
- Gamebird management