Skip to main content

Multiple values of isolated and clusters of Ficus tree species protected by Betsileo farmers in rural landscapes in Madagascar: implications for biodiversity conservation

Abstract

In Madagascar, biodiversity, local livelihoods and agroecosystems are increasingly threatened. It is critical to understand and support local social–ecological systems that sustain livelihoods and value biodiversity. This study investigates why Betsileo communities in Ambendrana and Sahabe protect isolated individuals and clusters of Ficus species in their rural landscapes. Ficus trees have multiple values and sustain webs of ecological interactions that favor biodiversity. We show that spontaneous seedlings of Ficus are protected and that people also actively propagate Ficus by stem cuttings. Their multiple values and uses and the distribution patterns of each species, are linked to social–ecological dynamics and to the historical construction of local landscapes. Both past and present uses associated with each Ficus species define how they are protected. Different sets of practices associated with each species are governed by both material and symbolic considerations. Ficus reflexa, a boundary marker of zebu corrals, has a symbolic role in protecting humans and livestock and checks erosion; F. lutea is a marker of residences of ancient noble classes and F. tiliifolia is a remnant of swidden agriculture and a marker of the memory of ancestors, but its numbers are shrinking. Ficus trees are protected but there is no strict taboo against cutting them when they hinder crop production. Their potential role for biodiversity conservation is linked to these social–ecological dynamics. Based on these findings, we propose some rules of thumb for developing collaborative approaches which consider synergies between local and scientific knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. The Merina is the dominant cultural group that lives in the northern part of the Highlands in Antananarivo and in the surroundings of what came to be the capital city of the country.

References

  • Aumeeruddy Y, Bakels J (1994) Management of a sacred forest in the Kerinci valley, Central Sumatra: an example of conservation of biological diversity and its cultural basis. JATBA 31(2):39–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y (2003) Conflits de pouvoir et de représentations à l'interface des sociétés et des aires protégées : le cas du Parc National Kerinci Seblat en Indonésie. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 278:77–91. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2003.278.a20180

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y (2013) Savoirs locaux et biodiversité: interactions sociétés et aires protégées Etudes comparatives: Indonésie, Népal, Pakistan et France. In: Juhé-Beaulaton D, Cormier-Salem M-C, Robert P, Roussel B (eds) Effervescence patrimoniale au Sud. Entre Nature et Sociétés. IRD Editions, Marseille, pp 55–75

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Hmimsa Y (2019) Fig and olive domestication in the Rif, Northern Morocco. Entangled human and tree lives and history. In: Stepanoff C, Vigne J-D (eds) Hybrid communities: biosocial approaches to domestication and other transspecies relationships. Routledge, London, pp 179–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Michon G (2018) Agroforestry. In: Callan H (ed) The international encyclopedia of anthropology. Wiley: London. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111892439.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Moukhli M, Haouane H, Khadari B (2017) Ongoing domestication and diversification in grafted olive-oleaster agroecosystems in Northern Morocco. Reg Environ Change 17:1315–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1143-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Rafidison V, Kjellberg F, Hossaert-McKey M (2018) Sacred hills of Imerina and the voyage of Ficus lutea Vahl (Amontana) in Madagascar. Acta Oecologica 90:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2018.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl260

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beaujard Ph (2009) La place et les pratiques des devins-guérisseurs dans le Sud-Est de Madagascar. In: Nativel D, Rajaonah FV (eds) Madagascar revisitée. En voyage avec Françoise Raison-Jourde, Karthala Paris, pp 259–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking sociological and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc-Pamard C (1986) Dialoguer avec le paysage ou comment l’espace écologique est vu et pratiqué par les communautés rurales des Hautes Terres malgaches. In: Ghatelin Y, Riou G (eds) Milieux et paysages. Masson, Paris, pp 17–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc-Pamard C, Fauroux E (2004) L'illusion participative, exemples ouest-malgaches. Revue Autrepart 3(31):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc-Pamard C, Rakoto Ramiarantsoa H (2007) Normes environnementales, transferts de gestion et recompositions territoriales en pays betsileo (Madagascar). La gestion contractualisée des forêts. Natures Sciences Sociétés 15:253–268. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2007055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc-Pamard C, Ralaivita M (2004) Ambendrana, un territoire d’entre deux: conversion et conservation de la forêt (Corridor Betsileo, Madagascar) Fianarantsoa, IRD/CNRE. CNRS/EHESS/CEAF Unpublished report

  • Burrows J, Burrows S (2003) Figs of Southern and South Central Africa. Umdaun Press, Hatfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrière SM (2002) Orphan trees of the forest. Why do Ntumu farmers of southern Cameroon protect trees in their swidden fields? J Ethnobiol 22(1):133–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrière SM, Andrianotahiananahary H, Ranaivoarivelo N, Randriamalala J (2005) Savoirs et usages des recrus post-agricoles du pays Betsileo : valorisation d’une biodiversité oubliée à Madagascar. VertigO : la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement. https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/3047. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.3047

  • Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, et al (2016) Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(6):1462–1465. https://www.pnas.org/content/113/6/1462.full

  • Dalecky A, Kerdelhue C, Johnson S, Razafindratsita VR, Grassi C, Razafiarimalala AC, Overdorff DJ, Rasplus J-Y (2003) Moraceae, Ficus and associated fauna. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP (eds) The natural history of Madagascar. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 322–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, van Oudenhoven APE, van der Plaat F, Schröter M, Lavorel S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew S, Erpul G, Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science 359(6373):270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diver S, Vaughan M, Baker-Médard M, Lukacs H (2019) Recognizing “reciprocal relations” to restore community access to land and water. Int J Commons 13(1): 400–429. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois H (1938) Monographie des Betsileos. Institut d’ethnologie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dury S (1991) Ethnobotanical approach to Ficus in northern Cameroon, Master’s Dissertation UNESCO/Man and the Biosphere Program, Paris.

  • Eden H, Cottee-Jones W, Bajpai O, Chaudary lB, Whittaker WR (2015) Isolated Ficus trees deliver dual conservation and development benefits in a rural landscape. Ambio 44:678–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0645-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen R (1996) The cognitive geometry of nature: a contextual approach. In: Descola P, Palsson G (eds) Nature and society. Anthropological perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 103–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Llamazares A, López-Baucells A, Rocha R, Andriamitandrina SFM, Andriatafika ZE, Burgas D, Temba EM, Torrent L, Cabeza M (2018) Are sacred caves still safe havens for the endemic bats of Madagascar? Oryx 52:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg C (1986) Classifications populaires des plantes et modes de connaissances? In: Tassy P (ed) L’ordre et la diversité du vivant. Quel Statut scientifique pour les classifications biologiques? Fondation Diderot, Fayard, Paris

  • Ganzhorn JU, Wilmé L, Mercier J-L (2014) Explaining Madagascar's biodiversity. In: Scales IR (ed) Conservation and environnemental management in Madagascar. Earthscan Routledge, New York, pp 17–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Giambrone NSJ (1973) Teto anivon’ny riaka. Centre de formation pédagogique. 5ème edition, Ambozontany, Fianarantsoa

  • Goodman SM, Benstead JP (2003) The natural history of Madagascar. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London, pp 58–1490

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SM, Ganzhorn JU (1997) Rarity of figs (Ficus) on Madagascar and its relationship to a depauperate frugivore community. Revue d’Ecologie Terre et Vie 52:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SM, Razafindratsita VR (2001) Inventaire biologique du Parc national Ranomafana et du couloir forestier qui relie au Parc national d’Andringitra. CIDST, Antananarivo-Madagascar

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB (1978) Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper J (2003) Memories of ancestry in the forests of Madagascar. In: Stewart PJ, Strathern A (eds) A landscape memory and history. Anthropological perspectives. Pluto Press, London, pp 89–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RD, Shanahan M (2005) Seventy-seven ways to be a fig: an overview of adiverse assemblage offigs in Borneo. In: Roubik DW, Sakai S, HamidKarim AA (eds) Pollination ecology and the rain forest. Springer, New York, pp 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JPG, Ratsimbazafy J, Ratsifandrihamanana AN, Watson JEM, Andrianandrasana HT, Cabeza M et al (2019) Last chance for Madagascar’s biodiversity. Nat Sustain 2:350–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0288-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg F, Jousselin E, Hossaert-McKey M, Rasplus JY (2005) Biology, ecology and evolution of fig-pollinating wasps (Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae). In: Raman A, Schaefer CW, Withers TM (eds) Biology, ecology, and evolution of gall-inducing arthropods. Science Publishers, Plymouth, pp 539–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg F, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Benoit L, Carrière SM, Hossaert-McKey M, Rakouth B, Edmond R, Rabevohitra R, Rafidison V (2010) Corridor de végétation et conservation d’un groupe clé de voute de la biodiversité, le cas des Ficus et des communautés associées, Rencontre ECOFOR

  • Kottak CP (1977) The process of state formation in Madagascar. Am Ethnol 4:136–155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/643527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull CA, Carrière SM, Moreau S, Rakoto Ramiarantsoa H, Blanc-Pamard C, Tassin J (2013) Melting pots of biodiversity: tropical smallholder farm landscapes as guarantors of sustainability. Environ Environ https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2013.765307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kun A, Obourny B, Diekmann U (2009) Intermediate landscape disturbance maximizes metapopulation density. Landscape Ecol 24:1341–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9386-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunwari R, Bussmann RW (2006) Ficus (Fig) species in Nepal: a review of diversity and indigenous uses. Lyonia 11:85–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning AD, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Scattered trees are keystone structures: implications for conservation. Biol Cons 132:311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning P, Loos J, Barnes AD, Battary P (2019) Transferring biodiversity-ecosystem function research to the management of ‘real-world’ ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2019.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marie CN, Sibelet N, Dulcire M, Rafalimaro M, Danthu P, Carrière SM (2009) Taking into account local practices and indigenous knowledge in an emergency conservation context in Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv 18:2759–2777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9672-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin E, Ratsimisetra L, Laloë F, Carrière SM (2009) Conservation value for birds of traditionally managed isolated trees in an agricultural landscape of Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv 18:2719–2742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9671-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell WJ, Sweeney SP (2005) Challenges of forest governance in Madagascar. Geogr J 171:223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00162.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora C, Sale PF (2011) Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434:251–266. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau S (2002) Les gens de la lisière. La forêt, l’arbre et la construction d’une civilisation paysanne Sud Betsileo, Madagascar. Dissertation, Universty of Paris X

  • Nazarea DV (1999) Cultural memory and biodiversity. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman RAA, van Rijk J (1991) Diagnosis of the temperament of tropical rain forest trees. In: Gomez-Pompa W, Hadley M (eds) Rainforest regeneration and management. MAB series 6, UNESCO and Parthenon Books, Carnford, pp 21–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M et al (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26–27:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2010) The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Social Sci 107(13):5786–5791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905455107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafidison VM (2013) Ethnobiologie et écologie des Ficus des terroirs Betsileo et du corridor Ranomafana—Andringitra (Madagascar). Dissertation University Antananarivo

  • Rafidison VM, Rabevohitra R, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Hossaert-McKey M, Rasplus JY, Kjellberg F (2011) Notes taxonomiques et identification des Ficus malgaches. Acta Bot Gallica 158(4):453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2011.10516287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafidison V, Rakotoanadahy B, Rakototomaro JF, Rafanomezantsoa E, Rasabo E, Rakotozafy R., Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y (2016) Pratiques et connaissances naturalistes des communautés Betsileo: lisière du corridor forestier Andringitra-Ranomafana, Madagascar. In: Roué M, Césard N, Adou Yao YC, Oteng-Yeboah (ed) Knowing our lands and resources.Indigenous and local knowledge of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Africa, UNESCO, Paris, pp 96–107 https://climatefrontlines.org/sites/default/files/ipbes/IPBES_in_Africa_2015.pdf

  • Raherisoanjato D (1984) Origines et évolution du royaume de l’Arindrano jusqu’au 19ème siècle. Contribution à l’histoire régionale de Madagascar. Travaux et document n° XXII. Musée d’art et d’archéologie. Université de Madagascar, Antananarivo

  • Rakoto Ramiarantsoa H, Blanc-Pamard C, Andriantseheno D, Ramamonjy H (2014) Des territoires et des contrats au service de l’environnement. Le Lalangina, sur le versant ouest du COFAV (corridor forestier Ambositra Vondrozo) à Madagascar. Eur J Geogr. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.26511. https://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/26511

  • Renard D, Tilman D (2019) National food production stabilized by crop diversity. Nature 571(7764):257–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1316-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rival L (1998) Trees, from symbols of life and regeneration to political artefacts. In: Rival L (ed) The social life of trees: anthropological perspectives on tree symbolism. Berg, New York, pp 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan M, Samson SO, Compton SG, Corlett R (2001) Fig-eating by vertebrate frugivores: a global review. Biol Rev 76:529–572. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793101005760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanoff C, Vigne J-D (2019) Hybrid communities: biosocial approaches to domestication and other transspecies relationships. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengö M, Brondizio ES, Elmqvist T, Malmer P, Spierenburg M (2014) Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. Ambio 43(5):579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waeber PO, Wilmé L, Ramamonjisoa B, Garcia C, Rakotomalala D (2015) Rabemananjara ZH (2015) Dry forests in Madagascar: neglected and under pressure. Int For Rev 17:127–148. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815815834822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter A, Sam C (1999) Fruits d’Océanie. IRD Editions, Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward C, Stringer LC, Holmes G (2018) Protected area co-management and perceived livelihood impacts. J Environ Manage 228:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Wilson A (2013) Figs as a global spiritual and material resource for humans. Human Ecol 41:459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9582-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by GIP Ecofor (Groupement d'Intérêt Public pour les écosystèmes forestiers). Funding to support the first author’s stay in France was obtained from the Service Culturel de la Coopération Française of the French Embassy in Antananarivo. The Centre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology (CEFE UMR 5175), CNRS in Montpellier hosted the first author and helped with data analysis and identification of Ficus species. We are grateful to the communities of Ambendrana and Sahabe for their willingness to participate in the interviews. We especially thank our guides Mr. Rajean Marie, Mr. Rakotomaro, Mr. Ramily and Mr. Roger for following us during our field studies and for accepting to participate in a workshop of the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) in Antananarivo (25–27 January 2016). We are grateful to Mr Dominique Hervé (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) for local logistical support and to Mr Vonjison Rakotoarimanana for his support in data analysis. We heartfully thank Professor Doyle Mckey for his multiple comments on the manuscript and for having accepted to read the last version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yildiz Aumeeruddy-Thomas.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniel Sanchez Mata.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rafidison, V.M., Rakouth, B., Carrière, S.M. et al. Multiple values of isolated and clusters of Ficus tree species protected by Betsileo farmers in rural landscapes in Madagascar: implications for biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 29, 1027–1058 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01924-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01924-3

Keywords

  • Ficus
  • Madagascar
  • Isolated and clustered trees
  • Rural landscapes
  • Traditional practices
  • Collaborative approaches
  • Forest corridor
  • Biodiversity