Abstract
Bumble bees are declining worldwide, their vital ecosystem services are diminishing and underlying mechanisms are species specific and multifaceted. This has sparked an increase in long-term assessments of historical collections that provide valuable information about population trends and shifts in distributions. However, museums specimens also contain important ecological information, including rarely measured morphological traits. Trait-based assessments of museums specimens provide additional information on underlying mechanisms of population trends, by tracking changes over time. Here, we used museum specimens of four Bombus species, spanning a timeframe of 125 years to: (i) compare body size of declining and increasing species, (ii) assess intra-specific trends over the last century, and (iii) investigate shifts in geographical distribution over time. We found that declining Bombus species were larger than increasing ones. All four species were smaller in current time than a century ago. Intra-specific size declines were more pronounced for larger-bodied species. With our sampling, declining and increasing species showed an upward shift in elevation, and declining species showed an additional geographic shift in recent times as compared to historic records. Intra-specific body size declines may represent species adaptation to unfavorable environmental conditions, and may be a useful metric to complement traditional species vulnerability assessments. We highlight the utility of incorporating trait-based assessments into future studies investigating species declines.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9:968–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x
Arbetman MP, Gleiser G, Morales CL, Williams P, Aizen MA (2017) Global decline of bumblebees is phylogenetically structured and inversely related to species range size and pathogen incidence. Proc R Soc B. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0204
Barbosa WF, De Meyer L, Guedes RN, Smagghe G (2015) Lethal and sublethal effects of azadirachtin on the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ecotoxicology 24(1):130–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1365-9
Bartomeus I, Ascher JS, Gibbs J, Danforth BN, Wagner DL, Hedtke SM, Winfree R (2013) Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:4656–4660. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218503110
Bartomeus I, Stavert JR, Ward D, Aguado O (2018) Historical collections as a tool for assessing the global pollination crisis. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0389
Bernauer OM, Gaines-Day HR, Steffan SA (2015) Colonies of bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) produce fewer workers, less bee biomass, and have smaller mother queens following fungicide exposure. Insects 6:478–488. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6020478
Biesmeijer JC et al (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863
Bommarco R, Lundin O, Smith HG, Rundlof M (2012) Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden. Proc R Soc B 279:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0647
Breeze TD, Gallai N, Garibaldi LA, Li XS (2016) Economic measures of pollination services: shortcomings and future directions. Trends Ecol Evol 31:927–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.002
Brown MJ et al (2016) A horizon scan of future threats and opportunities for pollinators and pollination. PeerJ 4:e2249. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2249
Burkle LA, Marlin JC, Knight TM (2013) Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function. Science 339:1611–1615. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232728
Cameron SA, Hines HM, Williams PH (2007) A comprehensive phylogeny of the bumble bees (Bombus). Biol J Linn Soc 91:161–188
Cameron SA, Lozier JD, Strange JP, Koch JB, Cordes N, Solter LF, Griswold TL (2011) Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:662–667. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014743108
Cane JH (1987) Estimation of bee size using intertegular span (Apoidea). J Kansas Entomol Soc 60:145–147
CaraDonna PJ, Cunningham JL, Iler AM (2018) Experimental warming in the field delays phenology and reduces body mass, fat content and survival: implications for the persistence of a pollinator under climate change. Funct Ecol 32:2345–2356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13151
Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2010) Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 85:139–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00097.x
Colla SR, Packer L (2008) Evidence for decline in eastern North American bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), with special focus on Bombus affinis Cresson. Biodivers Conserv 17:1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9340-5
Colla SR, Otterstatter MC, Gegear RJ, Thomson JD (2006) Plight of the bumble bee: pathogen spillover from commercial to wild populations. Biol Conserv 129:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.013
Colla SR, Gadallah F, Richardson L, Wagner D, Gall L (2012) Assessing declines of North American bumble bees (Bombus spp.) using museum specimens. Biodivers Conserv 21:3585–3595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0383-2
Couvillon MJ, Dornhaus A (2010) Small worker bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) are hardier against starvation than their larger sisters. Insectes Soc 57:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0064-7
Fauser-Misslin A, Sadd BM, Neumann P, Sandrock C, Osborne J (2014) Influence of combined pesticide and parasite exposure on bumblebee colony traits in the laboratory. J Appl Ecol 51(2):450–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12188
Foster DR (1992) Land-use history (1730-1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. J Ecol 80:753–771
Foster DJ, Cartar RV (2011) Wing wear affects wing use and choice of floral density in foraging bumble bees. Behav Ecol 22:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq160
Gerhardt F, Foster DR (2002) Physiographical and historical effects on forest vegetation in central New England, USA. J Biogeogr 29:1421–1437
Gerloff CU, Ottmer BK, Schmid-Hempel P (2003) Effects of inbreeding on immune response and body size in a social insect, Bombus terrestris. Funct Ecol 17:582–589
Goulson D, Sparrow K (2009) Evidence for competition between honeybees and bumblebees; effects on bumblebee worker size. J Insect Conserv 13:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9140-y
Goulson D, Peat J, Stout JC, Tucker J, Darvill B, Derwent LC, Hughes WO (2002) Can allothism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency. Anim Behav 64:123–130
Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008) Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol 53:191–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454
Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botias C, Rotheray EL (2015) Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255957
Grixti JC, Wong LT, Cameron SA, Favret C (2009) Decline of bumble bees (Bombus) in the North American Midwest. Biol Conserv 142:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.027
Harder LD (1982) Measurement and estimation of functional proboscis length in bumblebees (Hymeoptera, Apidae). Can J Zool 60:1073–1079. https://doi.org/10.1139/z82-148
Hatfield R, Jepsen S, Richardson L, Colla S (2014) Bombus ternarius. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014:e.T44937988A69005644
Hatfield R, Jepsen S, Thorp R, Richardson L, Colla S (2015a) Bombus terricola. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015:e.T44937505A46440206
Hatfield R, Jepsen S, Thorp R, Richardson L, Colla S (2015b) Bombus vagans, Half-black Bumblebee. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015:e.T44938024A46440316
Helm BR, Rinehart JP, Yocum GD, Greenlee KJ, Bowsher JH (2017) Metamorphosis is induced by food absence rather than a critical weight in the solitary bee, Osmia lignaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:10924–10929. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703008114
Herrmann JD, Haddad NM, Levey DJ (2018) Mean body size predicts colony performance in the common eastern bumble bee (Bombus impatiens). Ecological Entomology 43:458–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12517
Horton R et al (2014) Ch. 16: Northeast. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third National Climate Assessment. US Global Change Research Program, Washington
Jacobson M, Tucker EM, Mathiasson ME, Rehan SM (2018) Decline of bumble bees in northeastern North America, with special focus on Bombus terricola. Biol Conserv 217:437–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.026
Kerr JT et al (2015) Climate change impacts on bumblebees converge across continents. Science 349:177–180. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa7031
Kleijn D, Raemakers I (2008) A retrospective analysis of pollen host plant use by stable and declining bumble bee species. Ecology 89:1811–1823. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1275.1
Kleijn D et al (2015) Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nat Commun 6:7414. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8414
Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B 274:303–313. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
Kosior A, Celary W, Olejniczak P, Fijal J, Król W, Solarz W, Plonka P (2007) The decline of the bumble bees and cuckoo bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombini) of Western and Central Europe. Oryx 41:79–88
Larsen TH, Williams NM, Kremen C (2005) Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8:538–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00749.x
Mathiasson ME, Rehan SM (2019) Status changes in the wild bees of north-eastern North America over 125 years revealed through museum specimens. Insect Conserv Divers. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12347
Moure JS (1965) Some new species of euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 38:266–277
Mueller UG, Wolf-Mueller B (1993) A method for estimating the age of bees: age-dependent wing wear and coloration in the wool-carder bee Anthidium manicatum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). J Insect Behav 6:529–537
Müller A, Diener S, Schnyder S, Stutz K, Sedivy C, Dorn S (2006) Quantitative pollen requirements of solitary bees: implications for bee conservation and the evolution of bee-flower relationships. Biol Conserv 130:604–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.023
Oliveira MO, Freitas BM, Scheper J, Kleijn D (2016) Size and sex-dependent shrinkage of dutch bees during one-and-a-half centuries of land-use change. PLoS ONE 11:e0148983. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148983
O’Neill KM, Delphia CM, Pitts-Singer TL (2015) Seasonal trends in the condition of nesting females of a solitary bee: wing wear, lipid content, and oocyte size. PeerJ 3:e930. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.930
Owen RE (1988) Body size variation and optimal body size of bumble bee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can Entomol 120:19–27. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent12019-1
Persson AS, Smith HG (2011) Bumblebee colonies produce larger foragers in complex landscapes. Basic Appl Ecol 12:695–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2011.10.002
Ploquin EF, Herrera JM, Obeso JR (2013) Bumblebee community homogenization after uphill shifts in montane areas of northern Spain. Oecologia 173:1649–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2731-7
Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
R Development CoreTeam (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3–900051–07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/. R version 3.4.2
Radmacher S, Strohm E (2009) Factors affecting offspring body size in the solitary bee Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Apidologie 41:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009064
Rehan SM, Richards MH (2010) Nesting biology and subsociality in Ceratina calcarata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can Entomol 142:65–74. https://doi.org/10.4039/n09-056
Roulston TH, Cane JH (2002) The effect of pollen protein concentration on body size in the sweat bee Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Apiformes). Evol Ecol 16:49–65
Rust RW (1991) Size-weight relationships in Osmia lignaria propinqua Cresson (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 64:174–178
Scheper J et al (2014) Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in the Netherlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:17552–17557. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412973111
Schweiger O et al (2010) Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 85:777–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00125.x
Sirois-Delisle C, Kerr JT (2018) Climate change-driven range losses among bumblebee species are poised to accelerate. Sci Rep 8:14464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32665-y
Sunday JM, Bates AE, Dulvy NK (2012) Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat Clim Change 2:686–690. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1539
Tepedino VJ, Thompson R, Torchio PF (1984) Heritability for size in the megachilid bee Osmia propinqua Cresson. Apidologie 15:83–88
Tucker EM, Rehan SM (2016) Wild bee pollination networks in northern New England. J Insect Conserv 20:325–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9870-1
Tucker EM, Rehan SM (2017a) High elevation refugia for Bombus terricola (Hymenoptera: Apidae) conservation and wild bees of the White Mountain National Forest. J Insect Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iew093
Tucker EM, Rehan SM (2017b) Wild bee community assemblages across agricultural landscapes. J Agric Urban Entomol 33:77–104. https://doi.org/10.3954/1523-5475-33.1.77
Tucker EM, Rehan SM (2018) Farming for bees: annual variation in pollinator populations across agricultural landscapes. Agric For Entomol 20:541–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12287
U.S. Census Bureau (2012) United States Summary: 2010 Census of Population and Housing CPH-2-1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Williams PH (1998) An annotated checklist of bumble bees with an analysis of patterns of description (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini). Bull Nat Hist Mus (Entomology) 67:79–152
Williams P, Colla S, Xie Z (2009) Bumblebee vulnerability: common correlates of winners and losers across three continents. Conserv Biol 23:931–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01176.x
Williams NM, Crone EE, TaH Roulston, Minckley RL, Packer L, Potts SG (2010) Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biol Conserv 143:2280–2291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024
Williams PH, Thorp RW, Richardson LL, Colla SR (2014) The bumble bees of North America: an identification guide. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Winfree R, Aguilar R, Vazquez DP, LeBuhn G, Aizen MA (2009) A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90:2068–2076. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1245.1
Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, DeAngelo B, Doherty S, Hayhoe K, Horton R, Kossin JP, Taylor PC, Waple AM, Weaver CP (2017) In: Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, Dokken DJ, Stewart BC, Maycock TK (eds) Executive summary of the climate science special report: fourth National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effect models and extensions in R, 1st edn. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Dusty Durant, Stephanie Gardner, Elizabeth Haas, Molly Jacobson, Minna Mathiasson, István Mikó, Katherine Odanaka, Erika Tucker and Jacob Withee for specimen collection, processing, identification and data basing. This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project 1004515, the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research, Pollinator Health Fund grant number 549038.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by David Hawksworth.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nooten, S.S., Rehan, S.M. Historical changes in bumble bee body size and range shift of declining species. Biodivers Conserv 29, 451–467 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01893-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01893-7
Keywords
- Bombus
- Body size
- Long-term data
- Historic status assessments
- Museum collections
- Range shifts