Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term trends and a risk analysis of cetacean entanglements and bycatch in fisheries gear in Australian waters

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessments of fisheries interactions with non-target species are crucial for quantifying anthropogenic threatening processes and informing management action. We perform the first multi-jurisdictional analysis of spatial and temporal trends, data gaps and risk assessment of cetacean interactions with fisheries gear for the entire Australian Exclusive Economic Zone. Bycatch and entanglement records dating from 1887 to 2016 were collected from across Australia (n = 1987). Since 2000 there has been a substantial increase in reported bycatch and entanglements and this is likely the result of improved monitoring or recording by some jurisdictions and fisheries as well as changing fishing effort, combined with continuing recovery of baleen whale populations after cessation of commercial whaling. A minimum of 27 cetacean species were recorded entangled, with over 30% of records involving interactions with threatened, vulnerable or endangered species. Three times the number of dolphins and toothed whales were recorded entangled compared to baleen whales. Inshore dolphins were assessed as most vulnerable to population decline as a result of entanglements, though humpback whales, common bottlenose dolphins, and short-beaked common dolphins were the most frequently caught. Only one-quarter of animals were reported to have survived entanglement, either through intervention or self-release from fishing gear. Spatial mapping of the records highlighted entanglement hotspots along the east and west coast of the continent, regions where high human population density, high fishing effort, and high density of migrating humpback whales all occur, augmented by high captures of dolphins in shark control gear along the east coast. Areas of few entanglements were more remote, highlighting substantial bias in entanglement reporting. Our gap analysis identified discrepancies in data quality and recording consistency both within and between jurisdictions. Disparities in the types of fisheries data provided for the analysis by different state agencies limited our ability to compile bycatch data in a representative and systematic way. This research highlights the need for improved standardised data recording and reporting by all agencies, and compulsory sharing of detailed fisheries interaction and effort data, as this would increase the value of entanglement and bycatch data as a conservation and management tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS (2011) Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): volume 5—remoteness structure (cat. no. 1270.0.55.005)

  • AFMA (2013) Status report for re-assessment for export approval under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999—Northern Prawn Fishery—October 2013

  • AFMA (2014) Shark gillnet bycatch and discarding workplan 2014–2106. Australian Fisheries Management Authority

  • AFMA Commonwealth Fisheries Marine Mammal Working Group (CFMMWG) Meeting No 2: Efficient & sustainable management of Commonwealth fish resources, p 21 (2017)

  • Atkin M (2014) Controversial plans to expand tasmanian salmon industry, environmentalists accuse farms of polluting ocean. Retrieved from ABC News website http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-30/controversial-plans-to-expandtasmanian-farmed-salmon-industry/5780140

  • Atkins S, Cantor M, Pillay N, Cliff G, Keith M, Parra GJ (2016) Net loss of endangered humpback dolphins: integrating residency, site fidelity, and bycatch in shark nets. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 555:249–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas of Living Australia (2014) http://www.ala.org.au/

  • Baulch S, Perry C (2014) Evaluating the impacts of marine debris on cetaceans. Mar Pollut Bull 80:210–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bejder L, Hodgson A, Loneragan N, Allen S (2012) Coastal dolphins in north-western Australia: the need for re-evaluation of species listings and short-comings in the Environmental Impact Assessment process. Pacific Conserv Biol 18:22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgmann K, Möller LM, Harcourt RG, Kemper CM, Beheregaray LB (2011) The use of carcasses for the analysis of cetacean population genetic structure: a comparative study in two dolphin species. PLoS ONE 6:e20103

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks L, Palmer C, Griffiths AD, Pollock KH (2017) Monitoring variation in small coastal dolphin populations: an example from Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia. Front Mar Sci 4:94

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryden M, Marsh H, Shaughnessy PD (1998) Dugongs, whales, dolphins and seals: a guide to the sea mammals of Australia. Allen & Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd BL et al (2014) Strandings as indicators of marine mammal biodiversity and human interactions off the coast of North Carolina. Fish Bull 112:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll E et al (2011) Population structure and individual movement of southern right whales around New Zealand and Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 432:257–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll EL et al (2015) Cultural traditions across a migratory network shape the genetic structure of southern right whales around Australia and New Zealand. Sci Rep 5:16182

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cassoff RM, Moore KM, McLellan WA, Barco SG, Rotstein DS, Moore MJ (2011) Lethal entanglement in baleen whales. Dis Aquat Org 96:175–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chatto R, Warneke RM (2000) Records of cetacean strandings in the Northern Territory of Australia. Beagle 16:163

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham PJ, Baker CS (2002) Modern Whaling. In: Perrin WF, Wursig B, Thewissen JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1328–1332

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham PJ, Young SB, Brownell RL (1999) Baleen whales: conservation issues and the status of the most endangered populations. Mamm Rev 29:37–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2017) Recovery Plan for Marine Turtles in Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton S, Peddemors V, Green M (eds) (2017) Shark meshing (Bather Protection) program 2016/17 annual performance report. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange

    Google Scholar 

  • Dans SL, Koen Alonso M, Pedraza SN, Crespo EA (2003) Incidental catch of dolphins in trawling fisheries off Patagonia, Argentina: can populations persist? Ecol Appl 13:754–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson AD et al (2012) Drivers and hotspots of extinction risk in marine mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:3395–3400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK, Thrush SF, Agardy MT, Hofman RJ (1995) Environmental effects of marine fishing. Aquat Conserv 5:205–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Derraik JG (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 44:842–852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher WJ, Chesson JMF, Sainsbury KJ, Hundloe T, Smith ADM, Whitworth B (2002) National ESD reporting framework for Australian Fisheries: the ‘How To’ Guide for Wild Capture Fisheries. FRDC Project 2000/145, Canberra

  • Fry G, Miller M (2013) Appendix 7. Northern Prawn Fishery, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsworthy SD, Page B, Shaughnessy PD, Linnane A (2010) Mitigating Seal Interactions in the SRLF and the Gillnet Sector SESSF in South Australia. Report to the Fisheries Research and Development Institute. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide SARDI Publication No F2009/000613-1 SARDI Research Report Series No 405

  • Green M, Ganassin C, Reid DD (2009) Report into the NSW shark meshing (Bather Protection) program. Fisheries Conservation and Aquaculture Branch, Orange

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom C, Coughran D (2012) Entanglements of baleen whales off the coast of Western Australia between 1982 and 2010: patterns of occurrence, outcomes and management responses. Pac Conserv Biol 18:203

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther TJ, Baird RW, Ford JK, Langelier KM, McAdie ML, Wishniowski SG, Cornish TE (1993) Cetacean strandings and entanglement in fishing gear on the west coast of Canada during 1992. International Whaling Commission Meeting Document SC/45/O

  • Guenther TJ, Baird RW, Bates RL, Willis PM, Hahn RL, Wischniowski SG (1995) Strandings and fishing gear entanglements of cetaceans off the west coast of Canada in 1994 International Whaling Commission Document SC/47/O

  • Hamer DJ, Ward TM, McGarvey R (2008) Measurement, management and mitigation of operational interactions between the South Australian Sardine Fishery and short-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Biol Conserv 141:2865–2878

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt R, Aurioles D, Sanchez J (1994) Entanglement of California sea lions at los islotes, Baja California Sur, México. Mar Mamm Sci 10:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt R, Pirotta V, Heller G, Peddemors V, Slip D (2014) A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales: an empirical test. Endanger Species Res 25:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood J (2000) Risk assessment and decision analysis in conservation. Biol Conserv 95:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood M, Hembree D (1987) Incidental catch of small cetaceans in the offshore gillnet fishery in Northern Australian Waters 1981–1985. Report of the International Whaling Commission, 37

  • Helidoniotis F, Koduah A, Nicol S (2017) Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery

  • How J et al (2015) Effectiveness of mitigation measures to reduce interactions between commercial fishing gear and whales. FRDC Project No 2013/03. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia

  • Hugo Centre (2014) Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia Plus 2011 (ARIA + 2011). Hugo Centre for Migration and Population Research, the University of Adelaide. Adelaide, South Australia

  • ICES (2017) Bycatch of small cetaceans and other marine animals–Review of national reports under Council Regulation (EC) No. 812/2004 and other information

  • IWC (2001) Report of the workshop on the comprehensive assessment of right whales: a worldwide comparison. International Whaling Commission. J Cetacean Res Manag Spec Issue 2:1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (2010) Report of the Workshop on Welfare Issues Associated with the Entanglement of Large Whales. IWC Document IWC/62/15

  • IWC (2016) Annex J: report of the working group on non-deliberate human-induced mortality of cetaceans. Report of the Scientific Committee. IWC/66/Rep01

  • Jackson J et al (2015) Southern Hemisphere humpback whale comprehensive assessment—a synthesis and summary: 2005–2015 (received). Paper SC/66a/SH03 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee

  • Jaiteh VF, Allen SJ, Meeuwig JJ, Loneragan NR (2013) Subsurface behavior of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) interacting with fish trawl nets in northwestern Australia: implications for bycatch mitigation. Mar Mamm Sci 29:E266–E281

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Salvador G, John K, Robbins J, Kraus S, Landry S, Clapham P (2005) Fishing gear involved in entanglements of right and humpback whales. Mar Mamm Sci 21:635–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper C, Coughran D, Warneke R, Pirzl R, Watson M, Gales R, Gibbs S (2008) Southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) mortalities and human interactions in Australia, 1950–2006. J Cetacean Res Manag 10:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick JB, Kriwoken LK, Styger J (2017) The reverse precautionary principle: science, the environment and the salmon aquaculture industry in Macquarie Harbour, Tasmania, Australia. Pac Conserv Biol 25:26–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood J, Bennett P, Jepson P, Kuiken T, Simpson V, Baker J (1997) Entanglement in fishing gear and other causes of death in cetaceans stranded on the coasts of England and Wales. Vet Rec 141:94–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton AR, Hamilton PK, Marx MK, Pettis HM, Kraus SD (2012) Monitoring North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena glacialis entanglement rates: a 30 yr retrospective. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 466:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus SD et al (2005) North Atlantic right whales in crisis. Science 309:561–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laist DW (1997) Impacts of marine debris: entanglement of marine life in marine debris including a comprehensive list of species with entanglement and ingestion records. Marine Debris. Springer, New York, pp 99–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaper R (2016) Review of methods used to reduce risks of large whale entanglements. SC/66b/HIM07

  • Leaper R, Cooke J, Trathan P, Reid K, Rowntree V, Payne R (2006) Global climate drives southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) population dynamics. Biol Lett 2:289–292

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lewison RL, Crowder LB, Read AJ, Freeman SA (2004) Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends Ecol Evol 19:598–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnane A, McLeay L, McGarvey R, Jones A (2017) Industry-supported sampling underpins temporal management policy change in a commercial rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) fishery. J Shellfish Res 36:511–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd HB, Ross GA (2015) Long-term trends in cetacean incidents in New South Wales, Australia. Aust Zool 37:492–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle JM, Stark KE, Tracey SR (2014) 2012–13 survey of recreational fishing in Tasmania. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzuca L, Atkinson S, Nitta E (1998) Deaths and entanglements of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, in the main Hawaiian Islands, 1972–1996

  • Meager JJ, Sumpton WD (2016) Bycatch and strandings programs as ecological indicators for data-limited cetaceans. Ecol Ind 60:987–995

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore A et al. (2015) Developing robust and cost-effective methods for estimating the national recreational catch of Southern Bluefin Tuna in Australia

  • Moore MJ, Van der Hoop JM (2012) The painful side of trap and fixed net fisheries: chronic entanglement of large whales. J Mar Biol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/230653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JE, Wallace BP, Lewison RL, Žydelis R, Cox TM, Crowder LB (2009) A review of marine mammal, sea turtle and seabird bycatch in USA fisheries and the role of policy in shaping management. Mar Policy 33:435–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore J et al (2013) Evaluating sustainability of fisheries bycatch mortality for marine megafauna: a review of conservation reference points for data-limited populations. Environ Conserv 40:329–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RA, Worm B (2003) Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423:280–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature01610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Marine Fisheries Service (2016) U.S. National Bycatch Report First Edition Update 2. US Department of Commerce

  • Australian Marine Mammal Centre (2016) National Marine Mammal Data Portal. https://data.marinemammals.gov.au/. Accessed ​8 Sep 2016

  • Nemiroff L, Wimmer T, Daoust P-Y, McAlpine DF (2010) Cetacean strandings in the Canadian Maritime provinces, 1990–2008. Can Field-Nat 124:32–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitta ET, Henderson JR (1993) A review of interactions between Hawaii’s fisheries and protected species. Mar Fisheries Rev 55:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2016) 2016 West Coast entanglement summary. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

  • Noad MJ, Dunlop RA, Bennett LHK (2016) Abundance estimates of the east Australian humpback whale population (BSE1): 2015 survey update. Progress report to the International Whaling Commission SC/66b/SH/21:1:10

  • Noad MJ, Dunlop RA, Paton D, Cato DH (2011) Absolute and relative abundance estimates of Australian east coast humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). J Cetacean Res Manag Spec Issue 3:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman S et al (2004) Cetacean strandings in Oregon and Washington between 1930 and 2002. J Cetacean Res Manag 6:87–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace RM, Cole TV, Henry AG (2014) Incremental fishing gear modifications fail to significantly reduce large whale serious injury rates. Endanger Spec Res 26:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace RM, Corkeron PJ, Kraus SD (2017) State–space mark–recapture estimates reveal a recent decline in abundance of North Atlantic right whales. Ecol Evol 7:8730–8741

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Page B et al (2004) Entanglement of Australian sea lions and New Zealand fur seals in lost fishing gear and other marine debris before and after Government and industry attempts to reduce the problem. Mar Pollut Bull 49:33–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pala C (2017) New Zealand’s endemic dolphins are hanging by a thread Science 355:559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.355.6325.559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer C, Parra GJ, Rogers T, Woinarski J (2014) Collation and review of sightings and distribution of three coastal dolphin species in waters of the Northern Territory, Australia. Pac Conserv Biol 20:116–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra GJ, Cagnazzi D (2016) Conservation status of the Australian humpback dolphin (Sousa sahulensis) using the IUCN Red List Criteria. Advances in marine biology, vol 73. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 157–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra GJ, Corkeron PJ, Marsh H (2006) Population sizes, site fidelity and residence patterns of Australian snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins: implications for conservation. Biol Cons 129:167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra GJ, Cagnazzi D, Beasley I (2017a) Orcaella heinsohni. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T136315A50385982

  • Parra GJ, Cagnazzi D, Perrin WF, Braulik GT (2017b) Sousa sahulensis: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T82031667A82031671

  • Pauly D (2009) Beyond duplicity and ignorance in global fisheries Scientia Marina (Barcelona) 73:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D et al (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pichler F, Baker C (2000) Loss of genetic diversity in the endemic Hector’s dolphin due to fisheries-related mortality. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:97–102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pikesley SK, Witt MJ, Hardy T, Loveridge J, Loveridge J, Williams R, Godley BJ (2012) Cetacean sightings and strandings: evidence for spatial and temporal trends? J Mar Biol Assoc UK 92:1809–1820

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (2016) Marine fisheries and aquaculture, final report. Australian Government, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Read AJ (2008) The looming crisis: interactions between marine mammals and fisheries. J Mamm 89:541–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Read AJ, Drinker P, Northridge S (2003) By-catches of marine mammals In U.S. fisheries and a first attempt to estimate the magnitude of global marine mammal by-catch. International Whaling Commission paper SC/55/BC5

  • Read AJ, Drinker P, Northridge S (2006) Bycatch of marine mammals in US and global fisheries. Conserv Biol 20:163–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves RR et al. (2005) Global priorities for reduction of cetacean bycatch. World Wildlife Fund

  • Reeves RR, McClellan K, Werner TB (2013) Marine mammal bycatch in gillnet and other entangling net fisheries, 1990 to 2011. Endanger Spec Res 20:71–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid D, Krogh M (1992) Assessment of catches from protective shark meshing off NSW beaches between 1950 and 1990. Mar Freshw Res 43:283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid D, Robbins W, Peddemors V (2011) Decadal trends in shark catches and effort from the New South Wales, Australia, Shark Meshing Program 1950–2010. Mar Freshw Res 62:676–693

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reisser J, Shaw J, Wilcox C, Hardesty BD, Proietti M, Thums M, Pattiaratchi C (2013) Marine plastic pollution in waters around Australia: characteristics, concentrations, and pathways. PLoS ONE 8:e80466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins J, Mattila D (2004) Estimating humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) entanglement rates on the basis of scar evidence. Final report Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

  • Ross GJB (2006) Review of the Conservation Status of Australia’s Smaller Whales and Dolphins. Page(s) 124. Report to the Australian Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/resource/review-conservation-status-australias-smaller-whales-and-dolphins

  • Salgado Kent CP, Jenner C, Jenner M, Bouchet P, Rexstad E (2012) Southern Hemisphere breeding stock D humpback whale population estimates from North West Cape, Western Australia. J Cetacean Res Manag 12:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheld AM, Bilkovic DM, Havens KJ (2016) The dilemma of derelict gear. Sci Rep 6:19671

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper J et al (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322:225–230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segawa T, Kemper C (2015) Cetacean strandings in South Australia (1881–2008) Australian. Mammalogy 37:51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheavly S, Register K (2007) Marine debris & plastics: environmental concerns, sources, impacts and solutions. J Polym Environ 15:301–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slooten E, Dawson SM (2010) Assessing the effectiveness of conservation management decisions: likely effects of new protection measures for Hector’s dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori). Aquat Conser 20:334–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Slooten E, Fletcher D, Taylor BL (2000) Accounting for uncertainty in risk assessment: case study of Hector’s dolphin mortality due to gillnet entanglement. Conserv Biol 14:1264–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson PC, Wells S (2008) Evaluation of the effectiveness of reducing dolphin catches with pingers and exclusion grids in the Pilbara trawl fishery. Department of Fisheries Western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 173

  • Sumpton WD, Taylor SM, Gribble NA, McPherson G, Ham T (2011) Gear selectivity of large-mesh nets and drumlines used to catch sharks in the Queensland Shark Control Program. Afr J Mar Sci 33:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BL, Martinez M, Gerrodette T, Barlow J, Hrovat YN (2007) Lessons from monitoring trends in abundance of marine mammals. Mar Mamm Sci 23:157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BL et al (2017) Extinction is imminent for Mexico’s endemic porpoise unless fishery bycatch is eliminated. Conserv Lett 10:588–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Tønnessen JN, Johnsen AO (1982) The history of modern whaling. C. Horst & Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck GN, Knuckey I, Klaer NL (2013) Informing the review of the Commonwealth Policy on Fisheries Bycatch through assessing trends in bycatch of key Commonwealth fisheries. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation final report 2012/046

  • Tulloch VJD et al (2015) Why do we map threats? Linking threat mapping with actions to make better conservation decisions. Front Ecol Environ 13:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1890/140022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch VJD, Plagányi ÉE, Matear R, Brown CJ, Richardson AJ (2017) Ecosystem modelling to quantify the impact of historical whaling on Southern Hemisphere baleen whales. Fish Fish. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Hoop JM et al (2013) Assessment of management to mitigate anthropogenic effects on large whales. Conserv Biol 27:121–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield CB et al. (2014) Independent observations of catches and subsurface mitigation efficiencies of modified trawl nets for endangered, threatened and protected megafauna bycatch in the Pilbara Fish Trawl Fishery. Fisheries Research Report No. 244. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia

  • Waring GT, Josephson E, Maze-Foley K, Rosel PE (2013) US Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock Assessments 2012. Citeseer

  • Weimerskirch H, Brothers N, Jouventin P (1997) Population dynamics of wandering albatross Diomedea exulans and Amsterdam albatross D. amsterdamensis in the Indian Ocean and their relationships with long-line fisheries: conservation implications. Biol Cons 79:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells RS et al (2008) Consequences of injuries on survival and reproduction of common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) along the west coast of Florida. Mar Mamm Sci 24:774–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner T, Kraus S, Read A, Zollett E (2006) Fishing techniques to reduce the bycatch of threatened marine animals. Mar Technol Soc J 40:50–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner TB, Northridge S, Press KM, Young N (2015) Mitigating bycatch and depredation of marine mammals in longline fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci 72:1576–1586

    Google Scholar 

  • West LD, Stark KE, Murphy JJ, Lyle JM, Ochwada-Doyle FA (2016) Survey of recreational fishing in New South Wales and the ACT, 2013/14, Fisheries Final Report Series, no. 149. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Cronulla, Sydney

  • Wilkinson J (2013) NSW Commercial Fishing Industry: background to the 2012 review. Briefing Paper No. 2/2013

  • Wilson KA, McBride MF, Bode M, Possingham HP (2006) Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440:337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature04366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the Department of Environment and Energy (DEE). Some spatial information was generously supplied by from our colleagues at AFMA, DOF, DPaW, AAD, DPIPWE (TAS), NSW OEH, DPWS (NSW), NSW DPI, NT Govt, DELWP (VIC), DSE (VIC), DAF, DBCA (WA), South Australian Museum and IWC. We appreciate comments from FRDC and DEE on this manuscript. All agencies thank staff in the departments of environment and fisheries, and the public for reporting events and collecting carcasses. Collection managers from all agencies are thanked for their part in maintaining the collections and databases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivitskaia Tulloch.

Additional information

Communicated by David L. Hawksworth.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Coastal and marine biodiversity.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2278 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tulloch, V., Pirotta, V., Grech, A. et al. Long-term trends and a risk analysis of cetacean entanglements and bycatch in fisheries gear in Australian waters. Biodivers Conserv 29, 251–282 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01881-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01881-x

Keywords

Navigation