Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of climate on spider beta diversity across different Mediterranean habitat types

Biodiversity and Conservation volume 28, pages 3971–3988 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Maintaining species turnover across habitats is essential for biodiversity conservation. Thus, identifying drivers of community variation is important for conservation strategies. Here, we examine spider community variation along a Mediterranean climatic gradient in Greece, characterised by a mosaic of vegetation. We quantified spider community composition in 22 sites including three different habitat types (grassland, shrubland, oak forest) along a temperature gradient. Community composition was assessed at the family and species (Gnaphosidae and allied families) level. We partitioned beta diversity into two additive components, turnover/balanced abundance variation and nestedness/abundance gradient. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of habitat type, temperature, humidity and elevation on beta diversity. Results showed that different habitat types harboured distinct spider communities at both taxonomical levels. Turnover and balanced abundance variation of families and species were the largest beta diversity components. Turnover and balanced abundance variation of species but not families were significantly affected by temperature differences and the rate of compositional change was similar in grasslands and forests. We conclude that maintaining habitat heterogeneity in the area will conserve spider diversity and that future rising temperatures may potentially lead to species replacement and to changes in the chorological spectrum of the communities. Applying beta diversity partitioning at small spatial scales can offer valuable insights into climate change effects and sustain the development of appropriate conservation actions, especially in cases where temporal or coarser-scale distributional data are lacking. Given their sensitivity, ground spiders are good indicators of climate change effects on biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Aisen S, Werenkraut V, González Márquez ME, Ramírez MJ, Ruggiero A (2017) Environmental heterogeneity, not distance, structures montane epigaeic spider assemblages in north-western Patagonia (Argentina). J Insect Conserv 21:951–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew NR, Hill SJ, Binns M, Bahar MH, Ridley EV, Jung M et al (2013) Assessing insect responses to climate change: what are we testing for? Where should we be heading? PeerJ 1:e11

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson F, Jonsson LJ, Birkhofer K (2016) Geographic location, not forest type, affects the diversity of spider communities sampled with malaise traps in Sweden. Ann Zool Fenn 53:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Ávila AC, Stenert C, Rodrigues ENL, Maltchik L (2017) Habitat structure determines spider diversity in highland ponds. Ecol Res 32:359–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Bang C, Faeth S (2011) Variation in arthropod communities in response to urbanization: seven years of arthropod monitoring in a desert city. Landsc Urban Plan 103:383–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2013) Separating the two components of abundance-based dissimilarity: balanced changes in abundance vs. abundance gradients. Methods Ecol Evol 4:552–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2017) Partitioning abundance based multiple-site dissimilarity into components: balanced variation in abundance and abundance gradients. Methods Ecol Evol 8:799–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A, Orme D, Villeger S, de Bortoli J, Leprieur F (2017) betapart: partitioning beta diversity into turnover and nestedness components, R package version 1.4-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=betapart. Accessed 10 Jan 2018

  • Blois JL, Williams JW, Fitzpatrick MC, Jackson ST, Ferrier S (2013) Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:9374–9379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz S, Schroder M (2013) Diversity and ecology of spider assemblages of a Mediterranean wetland complex. J Arachnol 41:364–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Silva I, de Oliveira NG, Serrano ARM (2004) Indicator taxa of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Biol Conserv 120:517–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Silva I, de Oliveira NG, Serrano ARM (2007) Seasonality of spiders (Araneae) in Mediterranean ecosystems and its implications in the optimum sampling period. Ecol Entomol 32:516–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Crespo LC, Henriques S, Carvalho R, Gomes P (2011a) Biogeographic patterns of spiders in coastal dunes along a gradient of mediterraneity. Biodivers Conserv 20:873–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Crespo LC, Henriques S, Carvalho R, Gomes P (2011b) Determinants of beta diversity of spiders in coastal dunes along a gradient of mediterraneity. Divers Distrib 17:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Catsadorakis G (2012) Evros, thrace. In: Papayannis T, Howard P (eds) Reclaiming the greek landscape. Med-INA, Athens, pp 157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzaki M (2003) Ground spiders of Crete (Araneae, Gnaphosidae): taxonomy, ecology and biogeography. Dissertation, University of Crete

  • Chatzaki M, Lymberakis P, Mylonas M (2005a) The distribution of ground spiders (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) along the altitudinal gradient of Crete, Greece: species richness, activity and altitudinal range. J Biogeogr 32:813–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzaki M, Mylonas M, Markakis G (2005b) Phenological patterns of ground spiders (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) on Crete, Greece. Ecol Mediterr 31:33–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen IC, Hill JK, Ohlemüller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, van Swaay C, Bereton T, Brotons L, Chamberlain D, Heliölä J et al (2012) Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nat Clim Change 2:121–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynesius M, Jansson R (2000) Evolutionary consequences of changes in species’ geographical distributions driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9115–9120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Entling W, Schmidt MH, Bacher S, Brandl R, Nentwig W (2007) Niche properties of Central European spiders: shading, moisture and the evolution of the habitat niche. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:440–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Entling MH, Schweiger O, Bacher S, Espadaler X, Hickler T, Kumschick S, Woodcock BA, Nentwig W (2012) Species richness-environment relationships of European arthropods at two spatial grains: habitats and countries. PLoS ONE 7:e45875

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferger SW, Peters MK, Appelhans T, Detsch F, Hemp A, Nauss T et al (2017) Synergistic effects of climate and land use on avian beta-diversity. Divers Distrib 23:1246–1255

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch O-D, Blick T, Schuldt A (2008) Macroecological patterns of spider species richness across Europe. Biodivers Conserv 17:2849–2868

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Blaschke M, Bassler C (2011) Altitudinal gradients in biodiversity research: the state of the art and future perspectives under climate change aspects. For Ecol Landsc Res Nat Conserv 11:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischlin A, Midgley GF, Price JT, Leemans R, Gopal B, Turley C et al (2007) Ecosystems, their properties, goods, and services. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 211–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach J, Samways M, Pryke J (2013) Terrestrial invertebrates as bioindicators: an overview of available taxonomic groups. J Insect Conserv 17:831–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham PK, Huntley B, Kunin WE, Thomas CD (2012) The effect of spatial resolution on projected responses to climate warming. Divers Distrib 18:990–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins BA, De Vries PJ (2009) Tropical niche conservationism and the species richness gradient of NorthAmerican butterflies. J Biogeogr 36:1698–1711

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Fox R, Thomas CD (2006) The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob Change Biol 12:450–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ (2016) geosphere: spherical Trigonometry. R package version 1.5-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere. Accessed 10 Jan 2018

  • Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hore U, Uniyal VP (2008) Use of spiders (Araneae) as indicator for monitoring of habitat condition in Terai conservation area, India. Indian For 134:1371–1380

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Valverde A, Lobo JM (2007) Determinants of local spider (Araneidae and Thomisidae) species richness on a regional scale: climate and altitude vs. habitat structure. Ecol Entomol 32:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Valverde A, Baselga A, Melic A, Txasko N (2010) Climate and regional beta-diversity gradients in spiders: dispersal capacity has nothing to say? Insect Conserv Divers 3:51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurasinski G, Retzer V (2012) simba: a collection of functions for similarity analysis of vegetation data. R package version 0.3-5. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=simba. Accessed 10 Jan 2018

  • Kaltsas D, Panayiotou E, Chatzaki M, Mylonas M (2014) Ground spider assemblages (araneae: Gnaphosidae) along an urban-rural gradient in the city of Heraklion, Greece. Eur J Entomol 111:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirtman B, Power SB, Adedoyin JA, Boer GJ, Bojariu R, Camilloni I et al (2013) Near-term climate change: projections and predictability. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 953–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner C (2000) Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains may hold the answer. Trends Ecol Evol 15:513–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehenwinkel H, Tautz D (2013) Northern range expansion of European populations of the wasp spider Argiope bruennichi is associated with global warming-correlated genetic admixture and population-specific temperature adaptations. Mol Ecol 22:2232–2248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landsman AP, Bowman JL (2017) Discordant response of spider communities to forest disturbed by deer herbivore and changes in prey availability. Ecosphere 8:e01703

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne S, Mouquet N, Thuiller W, Ronce O (2010) Biodiversity and climate change: integrating evolutionary and ecological responses of species and communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:321–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR (2005) Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monogr 75:435–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite JMM, Debinski DM, Kerr JT (2017) High community turnover and dispersal limitation relative to rapid climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:459–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, You MS, Vasseur L, Yang G, Liu FJ, Guo F (2012) Higher taxa as surrogates of species richness of spiders in insect-resistant transgenic rice. Insect Sci 19:419–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallis RE, Rieske LK (2011) Arboreal spiders in eastern hemlock. Environ Entomol 40:1378–1387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall L, Biesmeijer JC, Rasmont P, Vereecken NJ, Dvorak L, Fitzpatrick U et al (2017) The interplay of climate and land use change affects the distribution of EU bumblebees. Glob Change Biol 24:101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald B (2007) Effects of vegetation structure on foliage dwelling spider assemblages in native and non-native Oklahoma grassland habitats. Proc Okla Acad Sci 88:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Meineke EK, Holmquist AJ, Wimp GM, Frank SD (2017) Changes in spider community composition are associated with urban temperature, not herbivore abundance. J Urban Ecol 3:juw010

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos F, Habel J (eds) Biodiversity hotspots. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno CE, Calderón-Patrón JM, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Barragán F, Escobar F, Gómez-Ortiz Y et al (2017) Measuring biodiversity in the Anthropocene: a simple guide to helpful methods. Biodivers Conserv 26:2993–2998

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D et al (2017) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-2. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan. Accessed 10 Jan 2018

  • Peters MK, Hemp A, Appelhans T, Behler C, Classen A, Detsch F et al (2016) Predictors of elevational biodiversity gradients change from single taxa to the multi-taxa community level. Nat Commun 7:13736

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett ST (1989) Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens GE (ed) Long-term studies in ecology. Springer, New York, pp 110–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Podani J, Schmera D (2011) A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence—absence data. Oikos 120:1625–1638

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018

  • Rahbek C (1995) The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography 18:200–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas-Martinez S, Rivas-Saenz S (1996-2017) Worldwide Bioclimatic Classification System. Spain: Phytosociological Research Center, http://www.globalbioclimatics.org. Accessed 1 Nov 2017

  • Robinson SI, McLaughlin ÓB, Marteinsdóttir B, O’Gorman EJ (2018) Soil temperature effects on the structure and diversity of plant and invertebrate communities in a natural warming experiment. J Anim Ecol 87:634–646

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Artigas SM, Ballester R, Corronca JA (2016) Factors that influence the beta-diversity of spider communities in northwestern Argentinean Grasslands. PeerJ 4:19–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Sereda E, Blick T, Dorow WHO, Wolters V, Birkhofer K (2012) Spatial distribution of spiders and epedaphic Collembola in an environmentally heterogeneous forest floor habitat. Pedobiologia 55:241–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP (2016) How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 31:67–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen J, Heino J, Wang J (2018) A meta-analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 27:96–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Suggitt AJ, Gillingham PK, Hill JK, Huntley B, Kunin WE, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Habitat microclimates drive fine-scale variation in extreme temperatures. Oikos 120:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and canoco draw for windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination. (version 4.5). Ithaca, New York: Microcomputer power

  • Timms LL, Bowden JJ, Summerville KS, Buddle CM (2013) Does species-level resolution matter? Taxonomic sufficiency in terrestrial arthropod biodiversity studies. Insect Conserv Divers 6:453–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Viterbi R, Cerrato C, Bassano B, Bionda R, Hardenberg A, Provenzale A, Bogliani G (2013) Patterns of biodiversity in the northwestern Italian Alps: a multi-taxa approach. Community Ecol 14:18–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, Keddy P (2001) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore O, Slotow R, Crouch TE, Dippenaar-Schoeman AS (2002) Diversity of spiders (Araneae) in a savanna reserve, Northern Province, South Africa. J Arachnol 30:344–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:280–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakkak S, Chatzaki M, Karamalis N, Kati V (2014) Spiders in the context of agricultural land abandonment in Greek Mountains: species responses, community structure and the need to preserve traditional agricultural landscapes. J Insect Conserv 18:599–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G, Li S, Wu P, Liu S, Kitching RL, Yang X (2017) Diversity and assemblage structure of bark-dwelling spiders in tropical rainforest and plantations under different management intensities in Xishuangbanna, China. Insect Conserv Divers 10:224–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Zografou K, Adamidis GC, Komnenov M, Kati V, Sotirakopoulos P, Pitta E, Chatzaki M (2017) Diversity of spiders and orthopterans respond to intra-seasonal and spatial environmental changes. J Insect Conserv 21:531–543

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was partly funded by the European Union (European Social Fund) and National Resources under the Operational Programme “Education and Lifelong Learning” Action 81324 - SPIDOnetGR, ARISTEIA II Programme, NSRF 2007–2013. We are grateful to M. Komnenov and O. Mettouris for setting and collecting pitfall traps.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, 1678, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Eva Pitta

  2. Institute for Ecology and Evolution, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012, Bern, Switzerland

    Konstantina Zografou

  3. Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, 70013, Iráklion, Greece

    Dimitris Poursanidis

  4. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Dragana, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece

    Maria Chatzaki

Authors
  1. Eva Pitta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konstantina Zografou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dimitris Poursanidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Chatzaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Pitta.

Additional information

Communicated by Jens Wolfgang Dauber.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1122 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pitta, E., Zografou, K., Poursanidis, D. et al. Effects of climate on spider beta diversity across different Mediterranean habitat types. Biodivers Conserv 28, 3971–3988 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01860-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01860-2

Keywords

  • Beta diversity partitioning
  • Climatic gradient
  • Gnaphosidae
  • Species turnover
  • Spiders
  • Greece

Search

Navigation