Skip to main content

Benchmarking nesting aids for cavity-nesting bees and wasps

Abstract

In urban areas, the diversity and abundance of cavity-nesting Hymenoptera may be restricted due to scarce nesting resources. Artificial nesting sites (nesting aids) are being installed to compensate for this shortage in a growing number of private gardens and public greenspaces to support Hymenoptera (especially bee) diversity. Various nesting aids are commercially available, but their effectiveness has so far not been investigated empirically. We compared a low-budget commercial nesting aid with a customized version based on scientific evidence. Commercial models comprised bamboo and coniferous wood cavities with fixed short lengths and little variation in diameter, whereas customized models comprised hardwood, reed and bamboo cavities with varying lengths and diameters. Both models were exposed pairwise in private gardens over one season and nesting Hymenoptera species identified. The commercial nesting aids were less well occupied, hosted fewer brood cells and had lower species diversity. Hardwood showed the highest rate of occupancy but reed cavities hosted the highest species diversity due to diverse cavity diameter and length combinations. Cavities with diameters between four and eight mm were occupied most often. Regardless of material, cavities with smooth entrances were strongly preferred. Nesting aids designed in accordance with our findings may thus support high and diverse populations of cavity-nesting Hymenoptera in anthropogenically transformed habitats such as urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the owners of all gardens for letting us work on their properties. Christian Schmid-Egger and Andreas Haselböck are gratefully acknowledged for identifying taxonomically ambiguous specimens. Vivien von Königslöw was financed by the Bayer Bee Care Center during the later stages of the writing process, but in support of another research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivien von Königslöw.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest in relation to the study in this paper. Vivien von Königslöw was financed by the Bayer Bee Care Center during the later stages of the writing process, but in support of another research project.

Additional information

Communicated by B. D. Hoffmann.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1882 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Königslöw, V., Klein, AM., Staab, M. et al. Benchmarking nesting aids for cavity-nesting bees and wasps. Biodivers Conserv 28, 3831–3849 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01853-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01853-1

Keywords

  • Bee hotel
  • Hymenoptera
  • Trap nest
  • Urban ecology
  • Wild bee