Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards an understanding of the drivers of broad-scale patterns of rarity-weighted richness for vertebrates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To combat biodiversity loss, conservation planners prioritize sites with high complementarity (ability to represent all or most species in a few sites), but little work has been done to understand the traits that influence site complementarity. Here we focus on the drivers of rarity-weighted richness (RWR), a metric of site endemism that has previously been demonstrated to be a reliable metric of site complementarity. Our aims are to assess how environmental variables individually contribute to explaining global patterns of RWR. After quantifying RWR for 18,020 terrestrial grid cells for amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, we used random forest models to identify associations between RWR and predictors reflecting current environment (topography, soils, climate), evolutionary history, and human footprint. Slope, long known to affect plant diversity, had strongest positive association with RWR values for amphibians, birds and mammals; human footprint was the primary driver of RWR for reptiles. RWR increased with slope, levels of human impact, diurnal temperature oscillation, land cover diversity, actual evapotranspiration, and cold season precipitation, Surprisingly, RWR increased with human footprint, perhaps because human activities cause species to have small ranges or because human activities and small-ranged species tend to occur under the same environmental conditions. Our study provides evidence that climate variables, including both temperature and precipitation—well known to drive patterns of species richness—also generate and maintain gradients of RWR at a global scale. As climate changes in the coming decades, regions of high RWR might also change, depending on the extent to which the spatial patterns of climate also change. Elucidating the patterns of RWR may improve the way in which sites are prioritized, so that all or most species can be conserved in affordable areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquerque FS, Beier P (2015a) Global Patterns and environmental correlates of high-priority conservation areas for vertebrates. J Biogeogr 42:1397–1405

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque FS, Beier P (2015b) Rarity weighted richness: a simple and reliable alternative to integer programming and heuristic algorithms for minimum set and maximum coverage problems in conservation planning. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119905

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque FS, Beier P (2016) Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation. Ecol Evol 6:8107–8114

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ardron J, Possingham HP, Klein C (2010) Marxan good practices handbook, version2. Pacific marine analysis and research association. Available: http://www.pacmara.org

  • Astudillo-Scalia Y, Albuquerque FS (2019) Evaluating the performance of rarity as a surrogate in site prioritization for biodiversity conservation. Glob Ecol Conserv 18:e00639

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2012). Bird species distribution maps of the world. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK and NatureServe, Arlington, USA

  • Bivand R, Krug R, Neteler M (2014) spgrass6: interface between GRASS 6 + geographical information system and R. R package version 0.8-6. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spgrass6/

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley LB, Jetz W (2007) Environmental and historical constraints on global patterns of amphibian richness. Proc R Soc B 274:1167–1173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Brown JH (1995) Global patterns of mammalian diversity, endemism and endangerment. Conserv Biol 9:559–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell HP, Hamilton GJ (2002) Particle size analysis. In: McKenzie NJ, Cresswell HP, Coughlan KJ (eds) Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land evaluation. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 224–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp MD, Laffan S, Linder HP, Monro A (2001) Endemism in the Australian flora. J Biogeogr 28:183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Csuti B, Polasky S, Williams PH, Pressey RL, Camm JM, Kershaw M et al (1997) A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol Conserv 80:83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie DJ (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. Am Nat 137:27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie DJ, Paquin V (1987) Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature 329:326–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DR, Edwards TE, Beard K, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler J (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RG, Orme CDL, Olson V, Thomas GH, Ross SG, Ding TS, Rasmussen PC, Stattersfield AJ, Bennett PM, Blackburn TM, Owens IPF, Gaston KJ (2006) Human impacts and the global distribution of extinction risk. Proc R Soc B 273:2127–2133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RG, Orme CDL, Storch D, Olson VA, Thomas GH, Ross SG, Ding T-S, Rasmussen PC, Bennett PM, Owens IPF, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (2007) Topography, energy and the global distribution of bird species richness. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1189–1197

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Zeiss MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 15:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) Global map of yearly actual evapotranspiration—5 arc minutes (GeoLayer). http://data.fao.org/ref/750d56ca-f92a-405e-8bbc-302221d55917.html?version=1.0. Latest update: 04 Jun 2015. Accessed 24 Apr 2017

  • Field R, O’Brien EM, Whittaker RJ (2005) Global models for predicting woody plant richness from climate: development and evaluation. Ecology 86:2263–2277

    Google Scholar 

  • Flather CH, Sieg CH (2007) Species rarity: definition, causes, and classification. In: Raphael MG, Molina R (eds) Conservation of rare or little known species: biological, social, and economic considerations. Island Press, Washington, pp 40–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis AP, Currie DJ (2003) A globally consistent richness-climate relationship for angiosperms. Am Nat 161:523–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns of biodiversity. Nature 45:200–227

    Google Scholar 

  • GlobCover (2009) (Global Land Cover Map) RELEASED ON 21st December 2010. http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php. Assessed Dec 2017

  • GRASS Development Team (2012) Geographic resources analysis support system (GRASS 6) programmer’s manual. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. http://grass.osgeo.org/programming6/

  • Grenyer R, Orme CDL, Jackson SF, Thomas GH, Davies RG, Davies TJ, Jones KE, Olson VA, Ridgely RS, Rasmussen PC, Ding T-Z, Bennett PM, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Gittleman JL, Owens IPF (2006) Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature 444:93–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Rahbek C (2011) SESAM—a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio-temporal patterns of species assemblages. J Biogeogr 38(8):1433–1444

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin GR, Lowe AJ (2015) Sum of inverse range-sizes (SIR), a biodiversity metric with many names and interpretations. Biodivers Conserv 24:2877–2882

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves GH (1994) Defining and using reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drainage Eng 120:1132–1139

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ, Friedman JH (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York, NY, USA. Random Forests for Classification in Ecology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5795733_Random_Forests_for_Classification_in_Ecology. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  • Hawkins BA, Porter EE, Diniz-Filho JAF (2003a) Productivity and history as predictors of the latitudinal diversity gradient of terrestrial birds. Ecology 84:1608–1623

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guegan J-F, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Porter EE, Turner JRG (2003b) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84:3105–3117

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberger RM, Holland B (2004) Statistical analysis and data display: an intermediate course with examples in S-Plus, R, and SAS. Springer Texts in statistics. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-40270-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, de Jesus JM, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Heuvelink GBM, Ribeiro E, Samuel-Rosa A, Kempen B, Leenaars JGB, Walsh MG, Ruiperez Gonzalez M (2014) SoilGrids1km—global soil information based on automated mapping. PLoS ONE 9:e105992

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick JE (2000) Soil quality: indicator of sustainable land management? Appl Soil Ecol 15:15–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Hortal J, Triantis KA, Meiri S, Thébault E, Sfenthourakis S (2009) Island species richness increases with habitat diversity. Am Nat 174:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt N, Gilkes R (1992) Farm monitoring handbook. The University of Western Australia, Nedlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert AH, Jetz W (2007) Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13384–13389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irl SDH, Harter DEV, Steinbauer MJ, Puyol DG, Fernández-Palacios JM, Jentsch A, Beierkuhnlein C (2015) Climate vs. topography—spatial patterns of plant species diversity and endemism on a high-elevation island. J Ecol 103:1621–1633

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRIC (2013) SoilGrids: an automated system for global soil mapping. Available at: http://www.soilgrids1km.isric.org/

  • IUCN (2016) Red list spatial data. http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/spatial-data. Accessed Sept 2016

  • Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:4–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT, Packer L (1997) Habitat heterogeneity as determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions. Nature 385:252–254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick J (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol Conserv 25:127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladle RJ, Whittaker RJ (eds) (2011) Conservation biogeography. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy B, Petillon J, Gallon R, Canard A, Ysnel F (2012) Improving occurrence-based rarity metrics in conservation studies by including multiple rarity cut-off points. Insect Conserv Divers 5:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy B, Canard A, Ysnel F (2013) Integrating multiple scales in rarity assessments of invertebrate taxa. Divers Distrib 19:794–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2014) randomForest: Breiman and Cutler’s random forests for classifications and regression. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest

  • Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Whittaker RJ, Brown JH (2010) Biogeography, 4th edn. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie N, Coughlan K, Cresswell H (2002) Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land evaluation. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CK, Baer SG, Whiles MR (2008) Ecosystem recovery across a chronosequence of restored wetlands in the Platte River Valley. Ecosystems 11:193–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG, Schemske DW, Cornell HV, Allen AP, Brown JM, Bush MB, Harrison SP, Hurlbert AH, Knowlton N, Lessios HA, McCain CM, McCune AR, McDade LA, McPeek MA, Near TJ, Price TD, Ricklefs RE, Roy K, Sax DF, Schluter D, Sobel J, Turelli M (2007) Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol Lett 10:315–331

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Meller L, Leppanen J, Pouzols FM, Arponen A, Kujao H (2014) Zonation spatial conservation planning framework and software, version 4. http://cbig.it.helsinki.fi/

  • O’Brien EM (1993) Climate gradients in woody plant species richness: towards an explanation based on an analysis of southern Africa’s woody flora. J Biogeogr 20:181–198

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien EM (1998) Water-energy dynamics, climate, and prediction of woody plant species richness, an interim general model. J Biogeogr 25:379–398

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien EM, Field R, Whittaker RJ (2000) Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water–energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography. Oikos 89:588–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlemuller R, Anderson BJ, Araújo MB, Butchart SHM, Kudrna O, Ridgely RS, Thomas CD (2008) The coincidence of climatic and species rarity: high risk to small-range species from climate change. Biol Let 4:568–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51:933–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Orme CDL, Davies RG, Burgess M, Eigenbrod F, Pickup N, Olson VA, Webster AJ, Ding T, Rasmussen PC, Ridgely RS, Stattersfield AJ, Bennett PM, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Owens IPF (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pärtel M, Kalamees R, Reizer U, Tuvi EL, Roosaluste E, Vellak A, Zobel M (2005) Grouping and prioritization of vascular plant species for conservation: combining natural rarity and management need. Biol Conserv 123:271–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1966) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am Nat 100:33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Raven P (2000) Biodiversity: extinction by numbers. Nature 403:843–845

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rabinowitz D, Cairns S, Dillon T (1986) Seven form of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. In: Soule ME (ed) Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 182–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez MÁ, Belmontes JA, Hawkins BA (2005) Energy, water and large-scale patterns of reptile and amphibian species richness in Europe. Acta Oecol 28:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll U, Feldman A, Novosolov M, Allison A, Bauer AM, Bernard R, Böhm M, Castro-Herrera F, Chirio L, Collen B, Colli GR, Dabool L, Das I, Doan TM, Grismer LL, Hoogmoed M, Itescu Y, Kraus F, LeBreton M, Lewin A, Martins M, Maza E, Meirte D, Nagy ZT, de Nogueira C, Pauwels OSG, Pincheira-Donoso D, Powney GD, Sindaco R, Tallowin OJS, Torres-Carvajal O, Trape J, Vidan E, Uetz P, Wagner P, Wang Y, Orme CDL, Grenyer R, Meiri S (2017) The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nat Ecol Evol 1(11):1677–1682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sala E, Knowlton K (2006) Global marine biodiversity trends. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:91–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel et al (2011) Influence of climate change velocity on species endemism. Science 334:660

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SCBD [Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity] (2010) Global biodiversity outlook 3. Montréal

  • Soberón J, Ceballos G (2011) Species richness and range size of the terrestrial mammals of the world: biological signal within mathematical constraints. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019359

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (2000) Precious Heritage: the status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein A, Gerstner K, Kreft H (2014) Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol Lett 17:866–880

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbauer MJ, Otto R, Naranjo-Cigala A, Beierkuhnlein C, Fernández-Palacios JM (2012) Increase of island endemism with altitude—speciation processes on oceanic islands. Ecography 35:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes L, Santini L, Newbold T (2019) Different forms of rarity interact to determine species’ responses to land use. Conserv Biol 33 (accepted)

  • Trigas P, Panitsa M, Tsiftsis S (2013) Elevational gradient of vascular plant species richness and endemism in Crete—the effect of post-isolation mountain uplift on a continental island system. PLoS ONE 8:e59425

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker MA et al (2018) Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359:466–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USGS [US Geological Survey]. No date. Global 30 Arc-Second Elevation (GTOPO30). https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/GTOPO30

  • Villalobos F, Dobrovolski R, Provete DB, Gouveia SF (2013) Is rich and rare the common share? Describing biodiversity patterns to inform conservation practices for South American Anurans. PLoS ONE 8(2):e56073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056073

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RJ, Willis KJ, Field R (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general hierarchical theory of species diversity. J Biogeogr 28:453–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RJ, Araujo MB, Jepson P, Ladle RF, Watson JEM, Willis KJ (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers Distrib 11:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildlife Conservation Society—WCS, and Center for International Earth Science Information Network—CIESIN—Columbia University (2005) Last of the wild project, version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): global human footprint dataset (Geographic). NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades. http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4M61H5F

  • Williams P, Gibbons D, Margules C, Rebelo A, Humphries C, Pressey R (1996) A comparison of richness hotspots rarity hotspots and complementary areas for conserving diversity using British birds. Conserv Biol 10:155–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams KJ, Belbin L, Austin MP, Stein JL, Ferrier S (2012) Which environmental variables should I use in my biodiversity model? Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26:2009–2047

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger F, Baltensweiler A, Ginzler C, Roth T, Braunisch V, Bugmann H, Bollmann K (2016) Environmental predictors of species richness in forest landscapes: abiotic factors versus vegetation structure. J Biogeogr 43(6):1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Bossio DA, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuloaga J, Currie DJ, Kerr JT (2018) The origins and maintenance of global species endemism. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12834

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Benito for providing the environmental variables, and S. Pimm and Miguel Araújo for comments on an earlier version of this paper. RL research is funded by CNPq (grant no 306694/2018-2). This paper is a contribution of the INCT in Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity Conservation founded by MCTIC/CNPq (grant no 465610/2014-5) and FAPEG (grant no 201810267000023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science and Mathematics Faculty, College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, 85212, USA

    Fabio Albuquerque

  2. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Yaiyr Astudillo-Scalia

  3. Conservation Biogeography Lab, Department of Ecology, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

    Rafael Loyola

  4. Fundação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Rafael Loyola

  5. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA

    Paul Beier

Authors
  1. Fabio Albuquerque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yaiyr Astudillo-Scalia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafael Loyola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Beier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Albuquerque.

Additional information

Communicated by Andreas Schuldt.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 123 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (CSV 6495 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albuquerque, F., Astudillo-Scalia, Y., Loyola, R. et al. Towards an understanding of the drivers of broad-scale patterns of rarity-weighted richness for vertebrates. Biodivers Conserv 28, 3733–3747 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01847-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01847-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation